• starting:  1435000693 (19:17:55 UTC) SRCL offset -455, no SRC ASC offsets.
• no squeezing: 1435001081 (19:24-19:32 UTC)

measured NLG with seed of 14.15, had to adjust temperature

• SRCL offset -200, no ASC offsets, 1435001999 (19:39 UTC)  angle scan: here
• SRCL offset 0, no ASC offsets 1435002482 (19:47:44 UTC) angle scan: here

Fitting to SRCL detuning guesses for these last two points would suggest we should update our SRCL offset to -382 counts (was previously -455).  We will do this now, as we are about to run a calibration measurement. 

While we were at 0 SRCL offset, Elenna looked at the impact of SRM alignment, she will alog this.  It does seem to have an impact of FIS, which is small compared to the impact of the SRC length offset. 

• -382, SRM alignment restored 1435004862 20:27:24 UTC