Displaying reports 1-20 of 85824.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End
Reports until 23:01, Wednesday 03 December 2025
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:01, Wednesday 03 December 2025 (88348)
instructions for recovering alignment after gate valves are excercised

It seems like it would be useful to have this recipie written in one place.  After the gate valves are opened and closed, we often have a hard time relocking because of alignment.  

Here's what we think we should do to recover after gate valves open.  

  1. Do initial alignment without using green cameras in the loop, as the cameras are right next to the gate valves. 
    1. Start by using the baffle PD dither alignment script to set the TMS alignment: use the suspension guardians to misalign both ITMs and ETMs, run dither align script for both TMSs found on the INIT ALIGN MEDM, (dither align scripts, TMSX and TMSY, can run at the same time).  Open the ITM baffle PD scope and watch the script find the pointing of TMS that sets the beam to PD1, PD4, and finally centered on the optic.  When this finishes sucsesfully for both TMSs, there should be a dim green beam visible on both ALS cameras, if there is not check the alignment of PR3 (affects both arms) and the BS (only moves the Y arm beam).  This TMS alignment has to be set before you can move onto the next step, otherwise the ITM alignment won't be right. 
    2. Use the suspension guardians to align both ITMs, but leave the ETMs misaligned.  Run the dither alignment script for ITMX and ITMY, this time watching the ETM baffle PD scope to watch the script's progress.  Once this is finished, the ITMs should be set, and we should not move them based on the cameras. 
    3. Use the suspension guardians to set the ETMs to aligned, and you will hopefully see mulitple beams or cavity flashes on the ALS cameras.  You can manually align the ETMs to increase the flashes until they are good enough to lock the arm.  Use the ALS guardians (in auto mode might be helpful) to set them to ETM_TMS_WFS_OFFLOADED, this will not run the green camera servos, it runs green WFS to the ETM and TMS alignment only to increase build up. Don't run INITIAL_ALIGNMENT or INITIAL_ALIGNMENT offloaded. 
    4. Align the vertex to these ITMs: set the ALIGN_IFO guardian to manual, init it to control the suspension guardians.  Choose INPUT_ALIGN_OFFLOADED, once that finishes PRC_ALIGN_OFFLOADED, then MICH_BRIGHT_OFFLOADED, then SRC_ALIGN_OFFLOADED.  
  2. Make two guardian changes before you start locking the full IFO
    1. Don't use the SRC1 + SRC2 ASC loops in DRMI, these don't seem to work until the alignment is set well for full lock.  You can turn these off by going to lscparams, and searching for use_DRMI_ASC, setting SRC1+ SRC2 to false.  Load ISC_DRMI for this change to take effect. 
    2. Don't shutter the ALS beams once they are no longer used for locking.  In ISC_LOCK, find the edge     ('IDLE_ALS',  'CARM_OFFSET_REDUCTION', 5), and reduce the weight which is normally 5 to 1, so that this path which avoids shuttering the ALS becomes the default path.  Load ISC_LOCK for this change to take effect.
  3. Start to relock as usual, going through PRMI.  Stop at CHECK_DRMI_ASC, where all the DRMI ASC loops will be running other than SRC1+SRC2, and manually adjust SRM sliders to reduce POP90 and increase POP18. 
  4. You can try to lock all the way to ENGAGE_ASC for full IFO, but this may not work.  If it does not, you may need to manually align DHARD, CHARD, and SRM. 
    1. If you are adjsuting alignments by hand, you want to keep the green beams locked to the arms as the alignment changes.  To get the green alignment to follow any changes you make, stop at IDLE_ALS and turn on the scripts that servo the green TMS QPD offsets based on the green WFS.  You can access this script by going to either ALS end station overview and clicking the button that says QPD OFFSETs, then using the pink drop down button to start the servo for each arm, and open the ndscope that lets you watch the progress of these servos (screenshot)
    2. If the power in the two arms is mismatched (visible on the PRMI SB4 min ndscope on the front wall), this could be a sign that DHARD is misaligned. 
      1. If you notice this in a state before DHARD WFS are closed, RF_DARM or CARM_OFFSET reduction , you can use the move_arm_dev script to step DHARD pitch and yaw to bring the arms closer to each other.  userapps/asc/h1/scripts/move_arm_dev.py DH P 0.01, or similar.  
      2. If you notice the arm powers diverging from each other after DHARD WFS are closed, this might be fixed by moving SRM while watching to make sure POP 90 stays low.  
    3. If the power recycling gain is low, you may need to adjust CHARD.  You can step through CARM_OFFSET reduction or stop after it finishes and use 62110 to check if the refl power is too low for the arm transmission that you are at, and try to move CHARD while trying to increase the refl power (watch build_up_slow ndscope linked from the ISC guardians overview and other places).  
  5. Once you are all the way locked (congratulations), stop at PREP_ASC_FOR_FULL_IFO before you try turning on ASC.  It may be a good idea to note the green QPD offsets with a screenshot, if you loose lock they wil be reverted with SDF revert but you would need to reset them to these values to relock.   Also look at the ITM green camera offsets, from each ALS end station overview in the green WFS section there is a button that says CAM ITM YAW or PIT, you can take a screenshot of this screen for both ITM cameras and compare the current location of the beam centroid to the setting (screenshot)
  6. Use a guardian shell (guardian -i ISC_LOCK) to copy and paste lines from ENGAGE_ASC_FOR_FULL_IFO manually, skipping SRC1 +SRC2.  (you might grab another screenshot of the green QPDs and cameras at this point)
  7. Then you can manual the guardian to TMS_SERVO, engage_soft_loops, and DARM offset, and take another green QPD offset + camera screenshot.  
  8. Having the DARM offset on as well as the soft loops seems to help the SRC ASC work, so try engaging those once those steps are done.  (Congratulations on getting all the ASC controlled)
  9. Important step: reset the green references.  In the past we have reset the green QPD offsets by accepting them in SDF as well as the camera offsets, but it doesn't make sense to be changing the QPD offsets as they shouldn't be impacted by the gate valve moving the camera.  Today once we had all the ASC engaged, we stepped the QPD offsets back to their original settings from SDF, watching the arm transmissions in the ndscope.  The arm transmissions seemed fine with the original QPD offsets, so we left those there and only updated the green camera offsets.  I think this should be the way we do things in the future, not reseting the QPD offsets by default.  

 

Images attached to this report
H1 SQZ
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:22, Wednesday 03 December 2025 (88347)
Touched SQZR Settings & Sliders

TITLE: 12/04 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering & LOCKED
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 10mph Gusts, 6mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.28 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

SQZ_OPO_LR was giving us this error: 
"CLF frequency out of range, check CLF CMB".
I do not recall how this was resolved by Daniel while he was checking out the CMB. 

Once that was resolved we got the classic: "pump fiber rej power in ham7 high, nominal 35e-3, align fiber pol on sqzt0."  issue.
The Quarter & Half wave plates on SQZT0 were touched up to minimize H1:SQZ-SHG-FIBR_REJECTED_DC_POWER_MON. 
OPO was locked. Great!


Then the FC wasn't locking: 
So FC2 was moved from its nominal location. only after I accidentally moved ZM1 and reverted it.
Fumbled with the FC2 sliders for a while, then used the clear history button.
Fumbled around some more with the FC2 sliders. 
Locked the the FC with FC2 P @ 246.1 Y @ 51.1

And now the SQZ has been SQuoZe.

Forcast for tonight's wind looks good for a stable lock.

H1 ISC (CAL, GRD, SUS)
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:58, Wednesday 03 December 2025 (88346)
Locking Summary

[Sheila, Jeff, Elenna, Corey]

Today we relocked with some issues. We think that the soft close of the gate valves shook the ITM green cameras enough that the green references were no longer good, which caused many alignment problems through carm offset reduction.

The SRC ASC is OFF in DRMI ASC at this time, by having the use_DRMI_ASC['SRC1'/'SRC2'] flag set to False. When locking, SRM and SR2 might need to be moved by hand before offloading DRMI ASC.

Sheila will write a more detailed alog about the process of updating the green references, because we think we have a better method now. For the summary, we have updated the green camera references, SDFed them in safe, and run an initial alignment after the lockloss.

Other guardian changes:

Tony, Oli and I have been watching violin mode damping. So far, there doesn't seem to be any problems.

By eye, Jeff and I think the PCAL X crosses do not match the line height in CAL DELTA L, so there may be some calibration mismatch. I will run a cal measurement when we are thermalized.

Squeezer is not working, Daniel and others are trying to troubleshoot now.

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:29, Wednesday 03 December 2025 (88330)
Wed DAY Ops Summary

TITLE: 12/03 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY:

Main goal for today was to continue to see troubleshoot H1 to see if it survived the CDS work from earlier this week (by trying to get H1 back to NLN)---Elenna and Sheila worked on this.  There continued to be issues with ASC SRC---Elenna said this is common for H1 recoveries.  Sheila also mentioned that the alignment issue most likely is a result of Gate Valve closures affecting the Green Camera alignment.

Recovery work above had to wait until about 11amPDT due to remaining LVEA crane inspections.  

During Recovery work 20-bit DAC card was swapped out for one which was installed yesterday that had issues.
LOG:

H1 CAL (CAL, CDS, DetChar, ISC)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:51, Wednesday 03 December 2025 (88341)
ISC EX 18-bit DAC Upgrade :: CAL Model Prep/Impact
J. Kissel, D. Sigg, D. Barker
ECR E2100485
WP 12901

Continuing on the deprecation of 18-bit DAC path (ECR E2100485), we upgraded the h1iscex's DAC0 card yesterday from an 18- to a 20-bit DAC (LHO:88333). One of the front-end models that use that DAC is the h1calex model.

In this aLOG, I discuss the front-end model changes we implemented to support this change.

I show the differences in before vs. after in the following screenshots. All changes were made at the top level of the model, no library parts were changed.
    - Top level model BEFORE vs. AFTER.
        Functional Changes:
        :: Changed the CDS part representation of the DAC from a 18- to 20-bit DAC.
        :: Added a constant of 4.0 ***, whose output is piped into a goto tag, CAL_FACTOR.
        :: The CAL_FACTOR from tag is first piped into a EPICs read back for display on MEDM (and for recording in frames), which will manifest as the channel H1:CAL-EX_DAC_CAL_FACTOR
        :: Then CAL_FACTOR is piped into multiplication blocks downstream of the DAC outputs such that the two channels used by the model CH5 and CH6 (with the count starting at 0; CH6 and CH7 in the analog world where counting starts at 1)

        Aesthetic Changes:
        :: Added the modern labels for direct IO chassis and inter-(computer)-process communication
        :: Detached the RFM IPC that ships the PCAL excitations to the corner station from its direct wire pick-off and "changed" it's input to be the tag that already exists to ship the signal to the DAC
        :: Moved that IPC system down to the left under the "new" RFM section, which allows for the model to conform to modern convention of having clear/clean separate sections for "input" "controls" and "output."
        :: Changed the color of the CDS parameters block to be orange, as is standard.

     - Another view of the top level to better highlight which signals are multiplied by four, and where in the signal change BEFORE vs. AFTER

The h1calex model has been committed, and rev-updated to to 
    /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cal/h1/models/
        h1calex.mdl         r23189 --> r34056


*** Because this model houses both the PCAL system, Hardware Injection and the DuoTone system -- critical flywheels for the detector calibration, we decided to implement our usual gain scaling of (exactly) 4.0x to compensate for the change in calibration (from 20/2^18 to 20/2^20 [ Vpp_differential / ct]) the DAC card upgrade as a hard-coded constant in the front-end, rather than in an "adjustable/changeable" filter module in a filter bank just upstream of the DAC output.
Images attached to this report
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:28, Wednesday 03 December 2025 (88342)
Wed CP1 Fill

Wed Dec 03 10:09:57 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 9min 54secs

Gerardo confirmed a good fill curbside. Plot looks strange because temps were starting positive.

Images attached to this report
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:57, Wednesday 03 December 2025 - last comment - 11:30, Wednesday 03 December 2025(88336)
Upgrade h1susex to all LIGO-DACs

WP12901 Daniel, Marc, Fil, Jonathan, Richard, Jeff, Oli, EJ, Dave:

Following from Monday's success in upgrading h1susey to the new LIGO-DACs on Tuesday 02dec2025 we upgraded h1susex to use LIGO-DACs.

This was a slightly different upgrade compared to h1susey because for the past 18 months h1susex ESDs have been driven using an early version of the LIGO-DAC. The h1susetmx model was using the GenStd 18/20-bit DACs for the upper stages and the LIGO-DAC for the L3 and ESD. The other models (h1sustmsx and h1susetmxpi) continued to use the Gen Std DACs.

The ESD and PI drives were being driven by a single 20bit-DAC using the special PI-AI chassis (first 6 chans through standard filters and output via DB15, last 2 chans through PI filters and output via DB9). When we upgraded the ESD drives to the LIGO-DAC we retained the original PI-AI chassis for these signals and temporarily installed the spare PI-AI chassis for h1susetmxpi 20bit-DAC's exclusive use.

The original LIGO-DAC used the 8-channel interface card. This card took the 32 channels from the LIGO-DAC and outputed the first 8 using its onboard DB25 connector. The remaining 24 channels were distributed using 3 Header Slot Plates (each with a DB25) ribbon cabled to the interface card. To fit these into the chassis, we displaced the two BIO cards to A4-3 and A4-4. 

The IO Chassis changes were then:

Remove first-gen LIGO-DAC card, its 8chan interface card and the 3 header slot plates.

Remove the 3 18bit-DACs and their interface cards

Remove the 2 20-bit DACs and their interface cards

Install 2 LIGO-DACs in A1-4 and A2-2 with their new LIGO-DAC interface cards

Move the 2 BIO cards back to A4-1 and A4-2.

Fil upgraded all the AI chassis for LIGO-DAC SCSI Connection, duplicating what was done at EY. The second LIGO-DAC drives the PI-AI chassis, the first LIGO-DAC drives the 2 standard AI chassis, now daisy chained together.

Temporary cabling from the original LIGO-DAC chans 16-31 looped over to h1iscex were removed.

LIGO-DACs ADDED

DAC0 S2500451 Interface card SN007
DAC1 S2500456 Interface card SN005

Cards Removed

First Gen LIGO-DAC S2400042
LIGO-DAC Interface Card "2" in marker pen
18bit-DAC 110425-32
18bit-DAC 110425-22
18bit-DAC 101208-74
20bit-DAC 190219-10*
20bit-DAC 150311-01 (S1700286)
18/20-DAC Interface card S1200225
18/20-DAC Interface card S1104340
18/20-DAC Interface card S1201759
18/20-DAC Interface card S1102690
18/20-DAC Interface card S1102687

* 20bit-DAC installed into h1iscex, now suspect.

Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 09:58, Wednesday 03 December 2025 (88337)CAL, SUS
Tagging SUS and CAL, as these are the DAC cards for SUS ETMX. 

We have done the logical thing of applying a gain factor of 1024x in the COIL and ESDOUTF banks to again mimic the calibration function of a 18- bit, like the factor of 4x that's been in play for a while after we upgraded to a 20-bit DAC. But, of course at the calibration group's level of precision / accuracy the DAC cards / and channels within will NOT have the same calibration as 2^18 / 20 [ct/Vpp_differential] * 2^10 = 2^28/20 [ct/Vpp]. 

This will change the open loop gain magnitude of the top mass damping loops, but to a much less important degree.
I expect a similar level of impact on ISC loops wrapped around ETMX too.

Also now that these LIGO 32CH DAC have had their maximum output voltage tuned to spit out 10.0 Vpp differential at the output of the AI chassis. 
This is unlike the 18-bit DAC who's output saturated at ~9.7 Vpp, or the 20-bit DACs who's output saturated at ~9.3Vpp.
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 10:00, Wednesday 03 December 2025 (88338)

Model Changes:

h1iopsusex (Dave) modified to new DAC configuration. SWWD section updated to new DAC cards

h1susetmx, h1sustmsx, h1susetmxpi (Jeff, Oli) updated to new DAC configuraiton.

All models built and installed with RCG5.5.2

filiberto.clara@LIGO.ORG - 11:30, Wednesday 03 December 2025 (88343)

The following AI Chassis were modified for installation of the LIGO 32 CH DAC:

AI Chassis D1000305 S1104367 (SUSEY-C1, slot U32, new assembly drawing D2500353)
AI Chassis D1000305 S1001202 (SUSEY-C1, slot U31, new assembly drawing D2500353)
AI Chassis D1500177 S1500299 (SUSEY-C1, slot U26, new assembly drawing D2500400)

The rear panel and DAC AI Interface Board D1000551 were removed. A new D2400308 LIGO DAC Anti Image Chassis Rear Panel and LIGO DAC AI Interface D2500097 were installed.

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:48, Wednesday 03 December 2025 - last comment - 10:09, Wednesday 03 December 2025(88333)
Upgrade h1iscex 18bit-DAC to 20bit-DAC

WP12901. Daniel, Jeff, Oli, Fil, Marc, Jonathan, EJ, Tony, Dave:

Summary:

Yesterday I replaced h1iscex's 18bit-DAC with a 20bit-DAC as part of the project to eliminate all 18bit-DACs from production. There is currently no indication that the 20bit-DAC is driving the AI chassis with any voltage, investigation is ongoing.

Details:

The 18/20 bit DACs use the same interface card, so for the upgrade I was able to pull the IO Chassis out half way with cables still attached to access the PCIe bus. I removed the old 18bit-DAC and replaced it with on of the 20bit-DACs from h1susex upgrade

old 18bit-DAC (removed) 110425-03
new 20bit-DAC (installed) 190219-10

I do not know if the 20bit-DAC from h1susex was the one driving the PI or the one which had been idle since the LIGO-DAC went in mid 2024.

The original interface card and ribbon cable were reused. No field cabling was disconnected, no AI chassis were powered down.

Upgrade was done between 12:00 and 13:00 Tue 02dec2025.

Later that afternoon Tony found that the PCAL readbacks were not responsive. Tony and I went to EX around 17:00 to verify the 20bit-DAC was installed and connected correctly, it was.

This DAC has a special AI Chassis, D1101785 "aLIGO 18 Bit AI Chassis" which has handy BNC pickoffs for all 8 channels. We put a scope on the two channels being driven by h1calex (6,7) and could see no signal.

Also the last channel on the AI is loop-backed to the first ADC AA chassis with a DB9 cable, and the IOP is configured by SDF to drive the duotone from DAC0-chan7 back to ADC0-chan30. No signal is seen there either since the upgrade.

Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 09:30, Wednesday 03 December 2025 (88335)

DCC docs for "18bit AI Chassis"

D1101785 [front section]

D1200316 [whole chassis]

The "AI WD" green LED on the rear panel is ON when the serial cable from the DAC Interface cable is connected and OFF when the cable is disconnected, suggesting the DAC is driving the WD line correctly at least.

david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 10:01, Wednesday 03 December 2025 (88339)

Model changes:

h1iopiscex (Dave) updated to new DAC configuration

h1calex, h1pemex (Jeff, Oli) updated to new DAC configuration

All models on this front end, including h1iscex and h1alsex, were built and installed with RCG-5.5.2

jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 10:09, Wednesday 03 December 2025 (88340)CAL, PEM
Tagging CAL and PEM because this is "their" DAC.

We've done the typically thing with a DAC upgrade: 
    - the DC calibration of the DAC has changed from (roughly) 20 / 2^18 [Vpp_differential / ct] to (roughly) 20 / 2^20 [Vpp_differential / ct] 
    - Such that upstream control systems "don't have to be retuned" we apply a digital factor of (exactly) 4.0x to all output signals for each DAC channel

As such, for example,  the calibration of the PCAL actuation / excitation chain is likely now slightly different, and should be remeasured.
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:20, Wednesday 03 December 2025 (88332)
Tue CP1 Fill

Tue Dec 02 10:01:28 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 1min 27secs

Does not look like a good fill. Will try again tomorrow

Images attached to this report
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:45, Wednesday 03 December 2025 - last comment - 08:05, Wednesday 03 December 2025(88329)
Wed DAY Ops Transition

TITLE: 12/03 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 5mph Gusts, 3mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.27 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

H1 was IDLE overnight (had troubles getting through DRMI and a few steps beyond yesterday afternoon/eve---see Oli's log).  In the middle of an Initial Alignment.  Then we'll see about locking...

Day #2 of Crane Inspection work continues:  This morning will be work for the South Bay crane, but will also need pendant work; this should go until about noon.  (Then remaining cranes would be:  Filter Cavity End Station, Staging Bldg, and some gantry cranes.)  Yesterday, rest of LVEA cranes were inspected as well as End & Mid Stations.

(it's been almost 15min and Green Arms are almost aligned from Initial Alignment.)

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 08:05, Wednesday 03 December 2025 (88331)CDS

Got word there are issues for PCal at EX (after investigations by Tony & Dave last night).  

After the alignment is done, Dave is going to restart models on h1iscex & then after that they will possibly swap back in the 18-bit DAC (after the 20bit DAC was installed yesterday).

H1 General (ISC)
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:40, Tuesday 02 December 2025 (88327)
IFO in IDLE for the night

The IFO has been trying to relock for a bit now, but we were having multiple locklosses, from DHARD_WFSx3, BS_STAGE2, and CARM_OFFSET_REDUCTION. Most of the locklosses looked sudden (based on quick look at buildups ndscope), but the last attempt, we started getting SRM saturations and the PR gain was moving all over the place. I remembered that Jenne and RyanS had been saying that SRC1 wasn't being cooperative yesterday (88298), so I turned off the SRC1 and SRC2 loops and that stopped the oscillation. Unfortunately, we lost lock soon after in DHARD_WFS. I was (am) about to go home so I've put the detector in IDLE for the night.

Images attached to this report
H1 CAL
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:23, Tuesday 02 December 2025 - last comment - 15:32, Wednesday 03 December 2025(88318)
Tuesday Maintenance Day PCAL Impact Notes.

Tuesday Maintenance day impact notes.

Due to Beckhoff upgrades and restarts the PCAL lasers were shutoff.
When Beckhoff came back up the PCAL Lasers oddly didn't come back up this time.
The H1:CAL-PCALX_LASERPOWERCONTROL voltage was set to 0. I took that back to 5V for both arms.
Turned H1:CAL-PCALX_LASERENABLE back on. 
H1:CAL-PCALX_SHUTTERPOWERENABLE back on.

Arm specific Settings : 

PCALX: 
H1:CAL-PCALX_OPTICALFOLLOWERSERVOOFFSET was set back to 3.65V. 
H1:CAL-PCALX_OPTICALFOLLOWERSERVOGAIN : 39.60 dB

PCALY: 
H1:CAL-PCALY_OPTICALFOLLOWERSERVOOFFSET : 3.80 V
H1:CAL-PCALY_OPTICALFOLLOWERSERVOGAIN : 38.56 V

Hey future Tony,  Today is the day the X Arm 18bit DAC was changed out for a 20bit as well.
 


 

Comments related to this report
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - 17:42, Tuesday 02 December 2025 (88328)CAL, CDS

I was not able to get PCALX excitations in DARM. The new 20 bit H1IOPSCEX DAC is then plugged into an 18 bit AI chassis. Dave and I went out to the End station and put an Oscilloscope on it to try and see any sort of excitation coming out of the 18 Bit AI chassis. No dice.
We will need to do more troubleshooting tomorrow. 

Images attached to this comment
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - 15:32, Wednesday 03 December 2025 (88345)CAL, CDS

Relvent Alog:  https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=88333

Dave and I went back down to EX and Swapped out a DAC in H1ISCEX, and the Excitations and Duotone started to work again.
DAC card that was put in on Tuesday : SN 190219-10 <- bad DAC
DAC card that was swapped in today : SN150311-01 This is the working DAC. 

I have since put back the OFSPD offset and Gain back to their nominal settings listed above.

Displaying reports 1-20 of 85824.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End