TITLE: 11/21 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY: PEM measurements were going well until a lockloss @ 01:27 UTC; PEM team was out in the LVEA at the time but were not doing anything particularly noisy. Ran an initial alignment then started relocking, but had a lockloss for some reason in LOWNOISE_ESD_ETMY; this didn't happen on the second relock attempt.

After relocking, I started testing Sheila's SQZ angle stepper script to make sure it's okay to run automatically tonight, but I ran into a few issues, so at this point it is not set to run overnight. After the last test run I did of the script, I accidentally just reverted the ZM4 PSAMs voltage from 15.2 back to its nominal 6.7 (I know now this is MUCH too quick of a change and could have caused a lockloss), so squeezing doesn't look great. Even still, H1 is observing and is set to relock automatically as usual overnight.

LOG:

• 01:27 - Lockloss from NLN
  • Ran initial alignment
• 02:47 - Lockloss in LOWNOISE_ESD_ETMY
• 03:51 - NLN

TITLE: 11/20 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: TJ
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: USEISM
    Wind: 13mph Gusts, 10mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.05 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.55 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY: H1 has been locked for 14 hours and PEM measurements continue with other opportunistic tests happening in between.

• Wind low, microseism on the rise and currently around 90th percentile
• All other systems nominal

TITLE: 11/20 Day Shift: 1530-2330 UTC (0730-1530 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan S
SHIFT SUMMARY: Locked for 13.5 hours. PEM characterization continues. The useism has been on the rise the last few hours.
LOG:                              

Thu Nov 20 10:09:15 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 9min 11secs

TITLE: 11/20 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 6mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.30 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY: Locked for 6 hours but it looks like the squeezer has an issue. Working on it now. Dust alarm in the diode room, but other than that, no alarms overnight.

Since I saw H1 was locked, I started the full magnetic injection suite (49 injections total over the 7 coils across site) at 05:40 UTC using the PEM_MAG_INJ Guardian. This dropped H1 out of observing, but it should return to observing once the injections finish. The suite will finish in roughly 2 hours or if the IFO loses lock, whichever comes first. I'll check things later tonight in case this poses any issues.

TITLE: 11/20 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY: PEM measurements were running smoothly until a lockloss @ 01:28 UTC. Since H1 is having a bit of trouble getting relocked (locklosses during LASER_NOISE_SUPPRESSION and DRMI) for reasons I'm unsure of, I've set things to run overnight the same as last night, with H1_MANAGER attempting to keep H1 up but not call for help. I've also set Sheila's SQZ angle stepper script to start at 09:00 UTC (01:00am PST) running on cdsws39 with the hope that H1 is locked.
LOG:

TITLE: 11/20 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: TJ
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 9mph Gusts, 6mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.33 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY: H1 has been locked for about 30 minutes and PEM measurements are ongoing.

• Wind is low, microseism slowly dropping and below the 90th percentile
• All other systems nominal

TITLE: 11/20 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan S
SHIFT SUMMARY: Currently at low noise, PEM characterization all day and one SQZ measurement started. There was one lock loss during the shift caused by us trying to move the corner station sensor correction off while in lock to allow Robert and a UW visitor look at the ITMY seismometer. Didn't work. Relocking was an initial alignment and then waiting at DRMI while we still had SC off, but all auto. 
LOG:

• 2206 Lock loss - we tried to turn off sensor correction in a way that would allow Robert and a UW visitor to access the bier garten seismometer.
• 2357 Nominal low noise                                                                                                                                

Jonathan and Yuri

This is a continuation of WP 12886.  This is the last physical step in the control room/MSR  for the reconfiguration.  We ran a fiber from the warehouse patch pannel to h1daqdc0 and replaced the network card with a newer card.  We will be renaming h1daqdc0, likely to h1daqkc0 (daqd kafka connector), and converting it to send the IFO data into the LDAS as part of the NGDD project.

Next steps on this work is to work on the software setup, and to install the corresponding fiber patch in the LDAS room.

Checking the safe SDF settings for the LSC and ASC model.

ASC model not monitored channels here. No outstanding SDF diffs while unlocked

LSC model not monitored channels here. Also no outstanding SDF diffs while unlocked.

ASCIMC has no unmonitored channels. No safe diffs with IFO unlocked.

I've ran a few different huddle test with the new TemTop dust monitors against 3 different MetOne GT521s. The first tests I ran in the Optics lab and Diode room showed some discrepancies between the spike times but that could be due to a difference in sample times vs the two dust monitors. The PMS21 and GT521s both sample for 60 seconds then hold for 300s, but the PMD331 does not have a built in hold time so it samples continuously or manually. The PMS21 usually reads an order of magnitude or two lower than the other two which makes me wonder if it needs a scale factor, but it also sees these big spikes occasionally that the others don't see which is confusing. The flow rate is listed as being 0.1 CFM on the PMS21, but the GT521s and the PMD331 are also listed as having flow rates of 0.1 CFM. CFM = Cubic feet / minute, its also = 2.83 L/min which is what I read when running the flow test on all of the DMs. *Also the times do not account for daylight savings, so each y-axis timestamp is actually an hour behind the actual PST*.

Test 1 - Optics Lab:

I tested the TemTops one at a time in the Optics lab, the results of the PMD331 and the results of the PMS21. 

Test 2 - Diode Room:

I tested the TemTops at the same time in the Diode room, I started off with only the PMS21 then I added the PMD331. For only the PMS21 we saw the these counts, for only the PMD331 we saw these counts, and for both of them we saw these counts,all against a MetOne GT521s. 

Test 3 - Control Room:

I tested three dust monitors at the same time in the control room ( I grabbed a spare pumped GT521s from the storage racks by the OSB receiving, it's our last properly working spare). I did a day of samples with holds enabled and a day of continuous sampling. When the dust monitors were sampling at slightly different intervals we saw the peaks offset from each other such as at 11-18 ~07:00 PST at the right of the plot. During the continuous testing we can see the peaks from everyone coming into the control room for the end of O4 celebration, I'm not sure why there's some time between the peaks, zooming in on this plot to cut out the large peaks from said celebration we can see the PMD331 and the MetOne GT521s following each other pretty closely, but the PMS21 wasn't really reading  much, there are small bumps around where the peaks from the other DMs are. Adding a scale factor of 10 to the PMS21 counts yield a better looking plot, playing with the scale factor till the PMS21 counts looked more in-line with the other DMs I got to a scale factor of 40 to get this plot.

In breaks in the PEM work this morning I improved the script I used last night so that I don't have to do as many things by hand.  The script is in sheila.dwyer/SQZ/automate_dataset/SQZ_ANG_stepper.py, I'll try to clean it up a bit more and add to userapps soon.  

It's running now and will take 5 minutes of no sqz time, and do the steps needed to measure nonlinear gain (it doesn't give a result, but some times that can be looked at later).  Then it takes some angle steps in 10 degree steps on the steep side of the elipse and 30 degree steps on the slow side of the elipse (where SQZ angle changes slowly with demod angle).  

This current version should take 1 hour to take 3 minutes of data at each point, or 1.5 hours for 4 minutes of data.  

It's now running for FDS with nominal psams settings, this can be aborted if PEM wants to do injections before it's over. 

Wed Nov 19 10:09:29 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 9min 25secs

I've made a fresh start on the noise budget code, using much of the work and many of the functions from aligoNB, but in a code that should be overall simpler for us to work with.  This exists in a repo here: simplenb.

Noises estimated using the excess power method can be read in either using gps times or from a dtt template. .xml files are tracked using git lfs and read in by dttxml. If a list of gps times is provided then the code will download the data using gwpy and save asds as a .pkl file, so that the data doesn't need to be downloaded each time the budget is run. Deleteing the pkl file from the local copy will cause it to redownload the data if the user wants to change times or resolution.  The excess power projection is done using the frequency resolution of the dtt file, or right now it is hard coded to an fft length of 3 seconds for those made using a list of gps times.  The noises are rebinned to a frequency vector specified for the budget after the projections are made. 

Thermal noises are imported from gwinc.  Quantum noises are also calculated using gwinc, which is why this code needs to be run in an environment that uses Kevin's superQK branch of gwinc.  I've added a function save_quantum_params to my quantum noise modeling repo that takes a template of a yaml file including all the parameters you think are important for modeling quantum noise, and a ifo struct, which saves a yaml file with the current parameters.  This function is also available in the quantum_utils.py function in this repo, so that people can use it with any method they like of generating a gwinc model of quantum noise to incorporate into this noise budget. I think it is best to leave the quantum noise budgeting separate from this repo for now, because the code for that is still evolving.  For now I've used the quantum parameters where all the missing squeezing is explained by frequency dependent loss from 85942, the next step is to add mode mismatches to that model.

Running the budget.py script will generate noise budget plots, you can choose how many layers deep to go in plotting sub-budgets by setting that parameter in the make_all_plots function call in the final lines.  The plots attached were made using the injections that Camilla made this morning (86550), and a reference time of 20:00 UTC.

Still to do:

• Add missing noises:
  • residual gas
  • DAC noise
  • PD dark noise
  • Newtonian Noise
  • remainder of ASC noises
• Correct some noise terms:
  • intensity noise has double counting around 1kHz (also an issue in old noise budget)
  • frequency noise loop correction (it is measured with only one sensor in loop, in full lock we use 2 sensors)
• Would be nice:
  • specifiy the ftt length for excess power noises using gps times for each noise
  • get Craig's interactive svg working, which isn't working in either model yet
  • add some useful information to plot, like gps time of reference, maybe some quantum model parameters