Displaying reports 1-20 of 86532.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End
Reports until 10:34, Saturday 07 February 2026
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:34, Saturday 07 February 2026 (89074)
Sat CP1 Fill

Sat Feb 07 10:09:46 2026 INFO: Fill completed in 9min 42secs

 

Images attached to this report
H1 IOO (IOO)
masayuki.nakano@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:56, Friday 06 February 2026 - last comment - 15:55, Saturday 07 February 2026(89073)
Vertical splited beam investigation

Summary of investigation into the vertically split beam from the EOM

 

Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 15:25, Saturday 07 February 2026 (89075)ISC, SYS

Horizontal beam position offset on the EOM input and output aperture on the side plates.

We realized that the nominal beam position on the EOM input and output aperture is NOT centered on the crystal cross section projected onto the side plate face, the beam is horizontally offset in +Y direction.

Look at the first cartoon (cartoon.jpg) and references therein. The beam spot offsets are 0.91mm on the input side plate and 0.54mm on the output side plate, respectively, assuming that the beam deflection angle per surface of EOM is 2.35 degrees as implied in D2500130.

0.91mm is not a small offset, it's almost 1/4 of the crystal thickness (it's 4x4x40mm).

This means that the beam should be (see nominal_sideplate.png, note that the drawing scale of the input aperture in this is twice that of the output aperture):

~3.9mm from the left (+Y) edge of the visual alignment aid notch on the input side plate,

~3.2mm from the right (again +Y) edge of the aperture hole on the output side plate.

Measurements, adjustments and measurements made the beam closer to the nominal location.

Based on the above knowledge, we took pictures of the beam position on the input/output aperture, paying attention to the errors that could arise from the parallax (which is unavoidable), i.e. the sensor card should be as close to the face of the side plate as possible and the beam spot on the sensor card should be as close to the sentor of the camera sensor as possible. This was a tougher job than you think.

Anyway, in the first round of measurements, we convinced ourselves that the beam was:

off in -Y direction by 0.7mm relative to the nominal beam position on the input plate of the EOM,

off in +Y direction by 0.5mm on the output,

give or take 0.2mm or so (the error is based on two pictures for the input beam position with random variation in parallax coming from camera position and the distance between the side plate surface and the viewer card).

We rotated the entire EOM base by using two dog clamps against the EOM base and inserting appropriate shims (EOM_rotation.png). We didn't use the YAW adjustment feature for the EOM pivot plate because there's no way to rotate it in a  controlled manner.

After the first adjustment we thought that the beam coming out of the EOM looked better (which might have been false). On the second adjustment the beam looked the same or slightly worse (which might have been false) and we reverted back to the same position as the first adjustment.

According to the pictures (input_measured.jpg and output_measured.jpg), the beam position is 
0.2mm off in -Y direction on the input,
0.6mm off in -Y direction on the output,
again give or take 0.2mm or so. Apparently the input got much better, we overshot for the output but it's not worse.
 
This is the last measurement done based on the pictures. After this, we reset the dog clamps without shims and used them as the YAW reference.
Images attached to this comment
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 15:55, Saturday 07 February 2026 (89076)INS, ISC, SYS

Multiple beams mostly in PIT coming out of EOM (pictures and history)

1W into HAM1, otherwise it's hard to photograph these clearly.

The first picture is right after the YAW adjustment was made but before adjusting PIT. The card is held just ABOVE the main beam, you can see four blobs that look like some kind of ghost beams. (If you try to picture the main beam, it's so bright these ghosts become hard to capture.)

The second picture is after the first PIT adjustment. You can only see maybe two blobs, but later we found that the rest went below the main beam (sorry no "below" picture).

So, to recap the history of the beam quality,

  1. Feb/03-04 (alog 89041).
    • The beam had horisontal line that was clearly visible even at 100mW input (horizontalstreak.jpg).
    • JAC beam was found to be higher than 1mm relative to the EOM, the latter was raised, the horizontal line was gone but I noted "but there was still a vertical streak that was hard to photograph".
    • Then the EOM was adjusted in YAW, I still noted "not sure if it's great though, it's hard to photograph but something faint might be coming out of the EOM". But note that the power was 100mW.
  2. Feb/05 (alog 89059)
    • With 1W input, Jason and Masayuki clearly saw multiple ghost beams in PIT above the main beam.
  3. Feb/06 (this alog)
    • EOM was adjusted in YAW, seemingly no change i.e.there were still multiple ghost beams in PIT.
    • Adjusting the EOM PIT angle made ghost beams go up and down relative to the main beam, but they didn't seem to go away.

Other things.

Just to make sure, we turned down the 9MHz and 45MHz RF power to 3dBm and disconnected the 118MHz and 24MHz cables and nothing changed.

We know that the crystal wedge is supposed to be horizontal and we know that the wedge orientation is correct. When we first installed the EOM in chamber, the EOM transmission was deflected horizontally in +Y direction.

Images attached to this comment
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:45, Friday 06 February 2026 (89063)
Fri Ops DAY Shift Summary

TITLE: 02/06 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
Super Bowl Weekend SHIFT SUMMARY:

JAC team continued with JAC alignment work in HAM1.  HAM3 AIP was swapped & started pumping over the weekend. 

(Go Seahawks!)

LOG:

 

H1 PSL
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:44, Friday 06 February 2026 (89072)
PSL Cooling Water pH Test - Monthly

FAMIS 28229

pH of PSL chiller water was measured to be between 10.0 and 10.5 according to the color of the test strip.

H1 SQZ (SQZ)
karmeng.kwan@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:11, Friday 06 February 2026 - last comment - 14:41, Friday 06 February 2026(89069)
HAM7 BL2 clipping model

From the previous alog post, Sheila measured a power drop across BL2 lens.

Here I modeled the loss of the 700um beam waist across the 2.5mm BL2 lens aperture.

The expression for the transmitted power obtained by modifying the Gaussian beam equation to include a displacement d= dx2 + dyis shown here.

And here's the contour plot for the loss (1-T) across the lens aperture for a beam transversing across various spots on the lens.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
karmeng.kwan@LIGO.ORG - 14:41, Friday 06 February 2026 (89070)

Me and Sheila are checking on the geometry of the setup.

The BM3 mirror mount IXM100.2 has a 100 pitch screw adjustment ( correspond to 100 turn per inch translation), and the beam appeared to be clipped symmetrically for 1/8 rev. For the mirror mount of 1.87" width, this correspond to a mirror rotation of 1.3mrad.

The distance between BM3 and BL2 is 148mm, from the mirror rotation, the IR beam angular deflection is 2.6mrad, this implies an aperture size of 0.4mm. Something is not right, and it's a mystery that requires more investigation.

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC (IOO)
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:11, Friday 06 February 2026 (89068)
IMC cavity axis now vs pre-vent

Following on from this log (alog #89046), we have already checked that the MC mirrors are restored to their previous positions from before the power cut in December. We know the seismic state now should be as close as we can manage to this time 2025-12-03 11:28:44 UTC when the mode cleaner was locked at 2W input power and before any HEPIs were locked for the vent.:

Summary of seismic state now:

HAM ISI locked. HAM 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ISI isolated.

HAM1,2 and  BSC2 HEPI locked. HAM 3,4,5,6 HEPI isolated - ie. as per nominal operation.

I trended the IM osems and the MC2 and IM4 QPDs in HAM2 while the mode cleaner was locked for mode scans yesterday (reference time is 2026-02-05 18:44:36 UTC).

It seem as though the MC2 and IM4 trans powers we have are lower now, but also the IM mirrors have changed.

As Sheila did yesterday I will try and summarise these changes in a table and compare whether this makes sense with the greater HAM1 loss we have because of the JAC (~40 %).

Just posting an updated version of Sheila's table to compare this new time (3rd December).

  2025-12-03 2026-02-05  
seismic state nominal HAM1 ISI, HEPI locked, HAM2 HEPI locked. MC mirrors should be at or close to nominal assuming table alignment didn't change much.
power into HAM1 H1:IMC-PWR_IN_OUT16 2W 1W  
MC2 trans 310 counts 90 counts consistent with 60% HAM1 throughput measured with a power meter (extra loss due to temporary mirror for JM3)

IM4 trans nsum

1.8W 0.1W should be 0.54 W so not consistent with JAC loss.
IM1 position P, Y 3130, -679 changed by -11, -0.44 Off in pitch
IM2 P, Y 915, -226 -50, -3 Off in both, mainly pitch.
IM3 P, Y 44, -1634 +4, -13 Off in both, mainly yaw
IM4 P, Y -2815, -22 +64, -8 Off in both, mainly pitch.

So after this Sheila and I are going to try turning on the IMC ASC and working out if we can tune the alignment onto IM4-TRANS using the IMs.

Images attached to this report
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:05, Friday 06 February 2026 - last comment - 15:11, Friday 06 February 2026(89067)
NDS1 restart, offload TW1 raw minute trends

WP13007

The rawminute trend copy to permanent archive completed 04feb2026. Today I reconfigured NDS1 to serve these data from their permanent archival location and started the deletion of the files from TW1.

NDS1 was restarted at 12:51 for the new configuration.

Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 15:11, Friday 06 February 2026 (89071)

Deletion of last 6 months of raw minute trend files took 1hr56min. Disk usage reduced from 93% to 2%.

H1 TCS
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:22, Friday 06 February 2026 (89066)
TCS Monthly Trends

FAMIS 38837

CO2 lasers have been off for the past month for vent activities and HWS SLEDs were just turned on a few days ago, so this month's trends don't show much activity.

Images attached to this report
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:48, Friday 06 February 2026 (89065)
Fri CP1 Fill

Fri Feb 06 10:08:33 2026 INFO: Fill completed in 8min 30secs

 

Images attached to this report
H1 PSL (PSL)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:40, Friday 06 February 2026 (89064)
PSL Status Report (FAMIS #39750)

This is for FAMIS #39750.

Laser Status:
    NPRO output power is 1.841W
    AMP1 output power is 70.43W
    AMP2 output power is 139.4W
    NPRO watchdog is GREEN
    AMP1 watchdog is GREEN
    AMP2 watchdog is GREEN
    PDWD watchdog is GREEN

PMC:
    It has been locked 0 days, 21 hr 23 minutes
    Reflected power = 27.19W
    Transmitted power = 103.9W
    PowerSum = 131.1W

FSS:
    It has been locked for 0 days 18 hr and 54 min
    TPD[V] = 0.4791V

ISS:
    The diffracted power is around 4.0%
    Last saturation event was 0 days 0 hours and 0 minutes ago

Possible Issues:
    PMC reflected power is high

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:36, Friday 06 February 2026 (89062)
Fri Ops Day Transition

TITLE: 02/06 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: MAINTENANCE
    Wind: 0mph Gusts, 0mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.31 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

HAM1 JAC work will continue.  HAM7 is closed but pumpdown has not started yet.  LVEA continues in the Bifurcated Laser Safe state.

H1 IOO (IOO)
masayuki.nakano@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:50, Thursday 05 February 2026 - last comment - 21:30, Thursday 05 February 2026(89060)
JAC Heater functioning

While Keita will report the detail about the heater wiring trouble shooting, here is the quick report for the JAC heater functionality.
The attatched plot shows the two thermistor signals (top/bottom) and the heater input (middle). The temperature is reasonably changing with the heater driver input.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 21:30, Thursday 05 February 2026 (89061)

JAC in-vac tri-cable was swapped. (Masayuki, Jennie, Jason, Keita)

The cable that failed (D2500336-V2, S2501241) was pulled out of the chamber. (In the process, one of the body mode damper crossbar had to be temporarily removed to release the cable. ) The cable was wrapped and put in a bag without further testing (yet).

Jennie and I tested the new tri-cable (D2500336-V2, S2501242) in the optics lab and it was good (i.e. every pin was connected to the pin it is supposed to be connected, no cross-wiring, no short circuits).

The new cable was installed in chamber. 

I checked the in-chamber connection from the in-air side of the D4F10 feedthrough. Pin13 wasn't connected to anything, ditto for the chamber ground, thermistors showed about 11kOhm each, heaters were about 50 Ohm each, PD anode and cathode were good, no cross-wiring and no unintended short circuits.

After connecting the in-air cable to the feedthrough, PZT and Trans PD worked right away.

After connecting the heater cable to the driver chassis, we confirmed (using the breakout board and a DVM) that the voltage across the heater elements was ~1.4V when H1:JAC-HEATER_DRV_VSET~3.6[V?],  H1:JAC-HEATER_DRV_VMON~1.6[V?] and H1:JAC-HEATER_DRV_IMON~-0.098[A?]. Maybe 1.4V is close enough to 1.6V (0.2V might be the voltage drop of the in-air cable?) but I don't understand the logic about VSET being 3.6V nor why IMON is negative (in my mind it seems logical if IMON~1.6V/25Ohm = 0.064A).

But it's good to know that it's doing something.

H1 IOO (IOO)
masayuki.nakano@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:42, Thursday 05 February 2026 (89059)
HAM1 beam damp campaign part 1.

[Jason, Masayuki]

We still need to find the back reflection beam from the septum viewport, and discuss what we will do for the vertically separated beams.

 

H1 General (Lockloss)
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:06, Thursday 05 February 2026 (89058)
Lock duration and ETM glitch lockloss stats through all of O4c

I never made updated plots for the lock duration and prevelance of the DARM glitch locklosses for the last couple months of O4c (up to Sept 1st, 2025, up to Oct 1, 2025), so here they are. The performance during October and November mostly line up with what we had been seeing in August and September following the bias change (86027).

Through October and November, the frequency of DARM glitch locklosses, and locklosses in general, was still lower than they had been before the ESD bias change. October went realy well. November wasn't the best month for ETM glitch locklosses - we had 8 locklosses due to ETM glitch during the month. That's only slightly worse than the amount we saw in August right after the bias was doubled, but during November we were locked for less time overall due to O4c ending on November 18th and PEM week not requiring us to keep the IFO locked overnight or on weekends, so that's not the best. However, we still had longer locks on average during November vs before the bias change.

O4 DARM Glitch vs All Locklosses
O4c Lock Length Distribution
O4c Lock Stats

Images attached to this report
LHO General
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:33, Thursday 05 February 2026 (89057)
Ops Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 02/06 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY: Work continued in HAM1 on/around the JAC, including ghost beam hunting and fixing a shorting cable. OMC scans were also taken today at points when the IMC could be locked (manually, since the IMC_LOCK Guardian is struggling to lock the IMC itself). HAM7 sits with its doors on, but pumpdown timing is still being discussed.
LOG:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
22:49 SAF LVEA is Laser SAFE LVEA NO* LVEA is Laser SAFE *BIFURCATED HAM1/2 Ongoing
16:03 FAC Kim LVEA N Technical cleaning 17:22
16:40 FAC Randy LVEA N Cleanup in East bay 17:09
17:11 ISC Sheila, Matt LVEA - Opening light pipe; plugging in SR785 to IMC board 17:38
17:53 FAC Randy LVEA N Cleanup in East bay 18:11
18:03 TCS Camilla, Sophie Prep Lab Local CHETA work 19:52
18:03 ISC Jason LVEA - Turning up input power to 1W 18:17
18:23 JAC Keita, Masayuki LVEA YES JAC EOM work 20:39
18:23 JAC Jennie LVEA YES JAC EOM work 18:53
18:32 FAC Kim LVEA N Technical cleaning 19:18
20:30 SUS Rahul LVEA - Working on PM1 21:21
21:13 ISC Matt, Sophie LVEA - Turning sidebands on 21:17
21:17 CAL Tony Pcal Lab Local Restarting voltmeters 21:28
21:21 VAC Travis LVEA - Taking picture of HAM3 21:25
21:36 JAC Keita, Jennie Opt Lab N JAC cable work 23:25
21:37 JAC Masayuki, Jason LVEA YES JAC EOM work Ongoing
21:53 CAL Tony PCal Lab Local Closing shutter 21:58
21:59 CDS Dave MER N Scouting rack install 23:18
22:18 VAC Travis LVEA N Grabbing parts 22:23
22:25 SEI Jim LVEA N Looking at feedthrus on HAM3 23:25
23:13 ISC Matt LVEA - Unplugging SR785 23:16
23:25 JAC Keita, Jennie LVEA YES JAC work Ongoing
23:51 CDS Dave CER N Scouting rack install 00:12
00:23 CDS Fil, Marc LVEA N Measuring cables Ongoing
Displaying reports 1-20 of 86532.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End