Dave, EJ, Ryan C.
Following the h1pemey install this morning I realized that this was the only model on h1iscey built against the latest RCG5.5.2 (all others were still at 5.5.0).
With Ryan's permission I rebuild h1iopiscey, h1iscey, h1caley, h1alsey with rev-lock to ensure identical software using RCG5.5.2 and restarted all the models at 09:41.
No DAQ restart was required.
WP13027, WP13029
Robert, Ryan C, Dave:
I installed new h1pem[cs, ex, ey] models this morning. Changes are:
. OSC+NOISE_GEN signal-injection section for DAC drives
. New AMON ground current monitor signals
. Fix GDS_n indexing at end stations
Note that the temporary "ADC" channel names for the ground current monitor could not be removed because they are being sent by the DAQ Broadcaster to GDS. These should be either changed to the new names (and CS added), or they should be removed.
| EX | H1:PEM-EX_ADC_0_09_OUT_DQ |
| EY | H1:PEM-EY_ADC_0_14_OUT_DQ |
A DAQ restart was required. This generally went OK, but FW0 restarted itself after running about 8 minutes.
In the event MER in-rack work causes issues with h1sush7 SWWD, I have bypassed h1seih7 SWWD for the duration of the work.
The vane position of the fan inside air handler 1 at End X was changed from 100% to 70% in order to increase the airflow through the fan. This was changed to more closely match the settings at End Y. End Y temperature trending has been consistent while End X has had moderate variation in comparison.
TITLE: 02/12 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: MAINTENANCE
Wind: 3mph Gusts, 1mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.05 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.28 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
TITLE: 02/12 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY: HAM1 work continues, HAM7 is pumping down.
LOG:
| Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22:49 | SAF | LVEA is Laser SAFE | LVEA | NO* | LVEA is Laser SAFE *BIFURCATED HAM1/2 | 16:49 |
| 16:10 | FAC | Kim | LVEA | N* | Tech clean | 17:30 |
| 17:10 | SQZ | Keita | Optics lab | LOCAL | EOM | 19:15 |
| 17:17 | EE | Marc, Fil | LVEA, CER | N* | Pulling cables | 00:46 |
| 17:28 | FAC | Mitch | LVEA | N | Checks, WEST BAY | 17:46 |
| 17:30 | FAC | Kim | EndX | N | Tech clean | 18:48 |
| 17:40 | ISC | Betsy | LVEA | N* | Parts | 17:48 |
| 17:49 | SQZ | Betsy | Optics lab | LOCAL | Join Keita | 19:15 |
| 17:54 | ISC | Camilla | LVEA | N* | Bring out dog clamps | 18:49 |
| 17:59 | SQZ | Elenna | Optics lab | LOCAL | Join Keita | 19:15 |
| 18:06 | FAC | Randy | LVEA | N /Y | BSC2 tent, at height hazard | 18:24 |
| 19:01 | ISC | Jason, Oli, Jennie | LVEA | Y | HAM1, refl path, Viewport simulator | 20:00 |
| 19:21 | FAC | Eric | EndX | N | Chiller yard checks | 19:35 |
| 21:20 | SQZ | Keita | Optics lab | LOCAL | EOM? | 23:32 |
| 21:33 | ISC | Jason, Jennie, Tony | LVEA | Y | HAM1 work, refl alignment | ongoing |
| 21:59 | VAC | Gerardo, Jordan | LVEA | N* | HAM4 annulus ion work, height laser hazard | 23:16 |
| 22:14 | FAC | Mitch | LVEA | N | West bay checks | 23:09 |
| 22:26 | FAC | Richard | LVEA | N* | Safety checks | 22:50 |
| 22:35 | SQZ | Betsy | Optics lab | LOCAL | Join Keita | 23:36 |
| 00:29 | ISC | Betsy | LVEA | Y | HAM1 | Ongoing |
18:15 UTC HAM7 SEI SW watchdog trip from a H7 crash, FE & ADC errors on IOPSUSH7 SUSFC1, SUSSQZIN SUSAUXH7, IPC and DK error on SEIH7.
Dave restarted everything ~20 minutes later
Following alog 89115, we found that the old batch crystal from that alog (S/N10252003) had a big chip at one corner. It is pretty bad we don't want to use that.
Betsy found another old batch (S/N10252007, "inspected 12/21/11" and UF tag dated 4/21/09), so we A-B-ed that one with the spare new batch (S/N B1913108).
The beam path was made as level as possible at 3" height using a beam leveling tool (a black metal thing with a tiny aperture at each inch of height).
We put the crystal on a platform that is roughly 2" 29/32 (which is about 2.4mm lower than 3"). The crystal is 4x4x40mm so that's about the right height.
We spent some time to make YAW alignment as good as we can for each of the crystals.
We scanned the beam in PIT from top to bottom (or bottom to top), each extreme is where the beam is almost clipped (but not actually clipped) by the top or the bottom face of the crystal.
Look at the attached, the new batch (left column) clearly shows multiple beams even though the focus is not as sharp as the old batch photos. As we misalign in PIT, the dark place moves relative to the main beam and the contrast changes too, but multiple ghost never went away. At the extrema (very close to the top or bottom edge) it looked as if the beam is better but I'm not sure it actually was.
The old batch (right) didn't show such a behavior. The beam shows something like a diffraction pattern but no separate ghost beams. Everything moved with the main beam. Not sure if the diffraction pattern came from the aluminum surface or EOM, but clearly this is MUCH better than the new batch.
Note, due to the apparatus (the steering mirror is 20" upstream of the EOM), we haven't searched in a huge PIT angle space, it's actually roughly +-4mrad or so, the angle is not negligible but it's more parallel displacement scan than an angle scan.
Also note, when the crystal was put in place it seems that there's some vertical deflection which was different for the old and the new. On the top two pictures, there's no change in the input alignment into the crystal.
Based on this observation, I'd say using the old batch makes sense. LHO people (Jennie, Rahul, Betsy and myself) had a brief conversation with Masayuki and MichaelL and we all agreed that that's the way to go.
Attached is the picture of the chip on the spare "older" crystal S/N10252003 The other picture shows the box labels of the EOM crystals and stat at LHO, namely: 10252003 chipped 10252007 to be swapped into the JAC EOM 2 newer ones which are having some scatter issues as Keita has written about
J. Kissel After conferring with Sina about the results from LHO:89047 and armed with the plan described at the tail end of LHO:89099, went into the optics lab to improve the rapid iteration of beam waist diameter measurement by concocting an optical layout that can measure the beam at two z positions at the same time. See attached diagram and physical setup. Note -- the optical table has become over populated with in-vac EOM crystal characterization (and additional beam-scanning set up), so Keita and I shared space by having his setup be at 3 inch beam height and me at 4.5 inch setup. This just barely cleared his beam scan, so I intend to further increase my beam height to 5 inches. I only have preliminary results (without having changed the collimator lens position at all yet), but they showed hints of astigmatism, so I suspect: - the polarization of the emitted beam from the fiber collimator - the beam splitters - clipping on the beam scan from Keita's setup. Will confer with the team.
I ran the chilled water pumps at the Mid stations this morning to exercise the bearings and seals. This will affect the temperature trending of the glycol loops but this is expected.
Wed Feb 11 10:11:01 2026 INFO: Fill completed in 10min 58secs
at 10:11 all the models on h1sush7 stopped with ADC timeouts. Most probably due to rack work on the Mech Rm Mez.
At 10:33 I verified that all the IO Chassis cards were visible on the bus and restarted the models. I cleared the HAM7 SWWD, it had tripped h1iopseih7.
TITLE: 02/11 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: MAINTENANCE
Wind: 9mph Gusts, 7mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.21 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
(Jordan V., Travis S., Gerardo M.)
Pumpdown was restarted this morning around 9:11 am local time. After pressure inside HAM7 reached 0.5 Torr we switched over to the turbo, we had a very smooth transition. After the internal pressure of HAM7 reached 5.0x10-05 Torr all O-ring isolation valves were closed (we have one at the turbo pump, another at the chamber and one more at the relay tube).
HAM7 internal pressure after 12+ hours of pumping is 5.2x10-06 Torr. The attached plot has a small glitch at the 10 hour mark, likely due to the DAQ restart.
Annulus ion pump update. The ion pump controller was turned on this morning, the ion pump controller struggled for some time as it was railed, but we did noticed that the pressure reading reported by the aux-cart (aux-cart remains connected and pumping on this system) dropped very slow, but after a some minutes the ion pump controller was not railed no more.
(Jordan V., Gerardo M., Travis S.)
Update for HAM7 pump down and other accessories.
- Pressure internal to the chamber continues to drop, slow but it is making progress. Plot attached. Pressure as of this entry is at 1.27x10-06 Torr.
- HAM7 Annulus system update, the ion pump made some good progress. The ion pump has settled down to 3 milliamps, good pressure reading, this allowed us to remove the aux-cart, can turbo and hoses from this ion pump.
- HAM7 RGA system, yesterday we connected an aux-cart+can turbo combo to this system, we are pumping it down to get it ready for use, but first we need to leak test the conflats that removed from the +Y door.
It took much longer than expected but we set up the beam path for the RTP test in the OSB optics lab.
Since more power makes it easier to see the ghost beams, I removed the beam dump that used to receive most of the red power (~530mW) and directed the beam to the front of the table (red path in the attached). I stole the steering mirror that used to be used for the low power P-pol path (circled in red). The low power p-pol path is now simply blocked. No other change was made to low power S-pol path (orange) as well as green path (green), but the beams are blocked by beam dumps. If you want to use these, simply unblock.
The beam radius will be 300~400 um or so at the location we plan to put the RTP (represented by a green rectangle in the second attachment). Elenna will post the plot of the beam size measurement.
The third picture shows the containers for different RTP. Left is the one for the crystal in HAM1. The middle seems to be from the same batch. Right looks different, on the bottom of the container there's a label saying "I/O something something 2017" so this is likely the old one.
We didn't have time to actually test the crystals, wait for tomorrow's udpate.
I made a mistake when providing calculations to Keita about the beam profile- I incorrectly input our distances as mm instead of cm. However, I think it's ok overall.
Keita and I put an available lens (f = 286.5 mm) into the beam path, and then used a thorlabs profiler on a rail to profile the resulting beam at five points. We measured distances from the lens to the profiler and accounted for the set back of our profiler from the edge of the mount, etc. This measurement allowed us to measure that the beam waist is roughly around the location of the laser, and is about 130 um in the x direction and 202 um in the y direction. Unfortunately, the beam quality isn't great, this is the best we could do. (Note, because of my mistake we chose not to use this particular lens, but it probably would have been fine for our measurements after all).
After some iteration, we determined that a f=401 mm lens was suitable, and we ended up placing it pretty close to the original lens location. We ran another profile measurement and found that we could achieve a beamsize of about 313 um in the y direction and 251 um in the x direction (different than Keita's reported numbers above because I originally fit an incorrect seed waist).
I have attached two plots. The first shows the profile of the beam with the original lens, and the second with the resulting lens that we have now used to measure the EOM crystal.
So, the beam is maybe a bit smaller than the beamsize on HAM1 that goes into the EOM crystal (around 350 um).
Jenne Drigger, Sheila Dwyer, Jennie Wright and Oli in chamber
The IMC guardian is now working when we put 3W into HAM1. Jenne held the output of MC2 M1 length drive, because that has not been working. We also edited the ISC_library is_locked(IMC function), by lowering the threshold used when the input power is above 2W. Since the IMC transmission has since improved it could probably be put back.
We engaged the WFS DOF1+2 which use MC refl WFS, and offloaded them. We then saw that we are well off center in MC2 trans P + Y, which were well centered on our reference time of 11:25 UTC Dec 3rd.
Jenne Driggers moved the IMs to match the top mass osems to the values from 89068. We also noticed that the whitening gain on IM4 trans was changed to 0Db (should be 18dB), making the power seem low in 89046.
| Dec3 | now | ||
| power into HAM1 | 2W | 3W (plus 30% loss on JM3) | |
| MC2 trans sum | 310 counts | 200-250 counts | 80% |
| IM4 trans NSUM (power into PRM) | 1.8W | fluctuating between 1W-3W | 1.45W expected |
| AS_C in single bounce | 3-4mW | 1.45*0.03*0.25*0.3 = 3.3mW into HAM6 | |
| IM4 trans pit | 0.23 | ||
| IM4 trans yaw | -0.04 |
Jennie and Oli are still working in chamber, so these numbers are still changing.
Olli and I went in and monitored IMC-MC2 YAW while changing the JM3 mirror in pitch, I loosened the locking screws for the pitvh adjustment to make it easier to move. Moving anti-lockwise in JM3 pitch moves down in yaw on the MC TRANS QPD due to the HAM1 periscope. We overshot a bit and had to correct the opposite way.
Every step I made we waited for the WFS to converge.
Every couple of steps we offloaded the WFS.
Then once we thought we couldn't get much closer we switched to adjusting YAW on JM3 to bring the MC2 TRANS pitch nearer to 0. The steps I made in yaw of JM3 didn't have as large an effect on MC2 TRANS as pitch so this was easier to tune.
I have included a plot showing our final values, 0.04 counts for yaw and 0.01 counts for pitch.
Jennie W, Jason O, Keita K.
As reported in this alog (#89073) from Masayuki and Keita, after we turned the power in HAM1 up to 1W we found a series of vertically spread ghost beams aroubnd the main beam after the EOM and before JM3.
These could not be removed by translating, yawing or pitching the EOM position relative to the beam. It was decided in a larger meeting with EOM design personnel that we would first check if the crystal was cracked or damaged anywhere in case this is the cause.
First photo shows the EOM from above, using a green torch to illuminate the beam path. I can't see any scatter from defects or cracks in the crystal.
Second photo shows possibly a chip at the corner, but this should not affect the beam as its right at the edge.
Third and fourth show side view with illumination from the top at an angle.
In summary we did not see any 'smoking gun' to cause these ghost beams.
Very rough power estimate for the ghost beam(s) is ~O(1%)
Jennie and Jason set up another temporary iris between JM2 and JM3, centered it with 1W into HAM1 to carefully block the ghost beams without blocking the main beam, then changed the power to 100mW (for safety) and measured the power at various places. Measurement accuracy cannot be great (Jennie and Jason says the numbers were jumping around as it was difficult to hold the power meter head at a fixed position mid-air) but I would say the power in the ghost beams is ~O(1%).
| JAC out | ~105mW |
| Between JM2 and the iris (includes wrong-pol beam) | 104~105mW |
| After the iris (wrong pol as well as ghosts blocked) | 99~100mW |
| Wrong-pol beam | 1~3mW |
| Background light (no beam) | 1~2uW |
Where do they go?
After opening the temporary iris that we just put in all the way, the iris just downstream of JM3 was already blocking some of the ghost beams as well as the wrong polarization beam (JM3iris.jpg). Vertical beams don't look vertical because the iris is not a flat plane and we have a large parallax here. Anyway, it seems that we can block further if we want to from the top and the bottom.
The picture of the last iris on HAM1 shows that something is blocked on the left (+Y) side (outputiris.jpg). Looks like the iris is clipping something on the right but the camera couldn't be positioned to have a good view for both sides.
The last picture (after_last_iris.jpg) shows the beam right after the last iris on HAM1. You can see that some ghost beams are still coming through.
With this beam injected into HAM2 and misaligning MC2, we looked into IOT2L to see the MC REFL beam. We weren't able to find ghost beams there, though Jason and I felt that the beam is not super clean.
One question Jason had was whether or not the diverging beams that originate from the EOM location are supposed to keep diverging after lenses.
The beam after the second lens is actually not diverging. According to this plot, we suppose to be able to find the splitted beams in the IOT2 table.
EPO taggin'.
Randy, Ibrahim
Randy and I put the BBSS in the can today, as shown by pictures.
Following LLO's advice from their experiences in alog 79950, we were able to use the aluma lift to can the BBSS. What we did in order:
1. Strip locked-mass BBSS of all cables, check for looseness, bring alum-a-lift into position to lift BBSS from lifitng bars
2. Undo dog clamps to let lift take suspension load, ensure suspension is secured on the lift. Move BBSS out of test stand - as LLO said, very small clearance.
3. Prepare temporary platform for lift fork adjustment
4. Set BBSS on temporary platform - this part was successful but needed extra blocks to avoid interference with Y-bracks on the Lower Structure.
5. Adjust forks to be allow for canning without bottoming out, relift.
6. Put into wiped-down can and check for looseness. Rewipe, check for particulate and ensure secure fit
7. Close doors.
See pictures below.
EPO taggin'.
(Jordan V., Gerardo M.)
-Late entry
On Friday we removed and replaced the ion pump for HAM3. We replaced the copper gasket twice, the first gasket seal had a bad leak, it was hard to see the mating surfaces due to visibility issues (laser safety goggles and not enough light).
After installing a second gasket, we started pumping down the annulus system and pressure went down fast. Last pressure reading at the aux-cart was 4.63x10^-05 Torr.
BTW, we have other 4 (four) ion pumps to replace.
EPO taggin'.
(Jordan V., Gerardo M.)
After a couple of days of "assisted" pumping, the annulus system isolation valve was closed. After a day of solo pumping the ion pump was able to maintain the annulus pressure at nominal. Now the aux-cart, can turbo and hoses were removed, pressure looks good.