TITLE: 03/15 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Wind
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan S
SHIFT SUMMARY:
IFO is LOCKING in ENVIRONMENT
IFO is extremely unstable due to the wind, which during the shift has gone between 30mph 50mph. We have been unable to lock all day, and will likely only be able to relock after 5PM local time (forecasted beginning of the end for gusts).
I stayed in IDLE for times where we were incessantly losing lock but tried locking 3 times when there was a slight lull, which got us up to MAX_POWER, before losing lock again due to wind. (Midshift Report Alog 83387).
Attached is the current state of the EY wind fence. The left pane is totally torn and slid to the left side as seen.
Microseism is also on the rise while EQ activity is low.
LOG:
Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21:53 | PEM | Robert | LVEA | N | Taking a picture | 22:00 |
TITLE: 03/15 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Wind
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: USEISM
Wind: 32mph Gusts, 16mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.07 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.43 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: H1 has been down most of they day due to high winds. Gusts are starting to slowly calm down, so we're attempting to lock now.
We had a small lull in wind speeds and I was able to get to MAX_POWER, but then it picked back up and we lost lock. If the wind continuiies to increase, I will sit in IDLE again until the wind comes down. Forecast is now showing wind to continue until 18:00 Local Time.
Both LLO and LHO are unlocked so no calibration sweeps have been taken.
Sat Mar 15 10:08:11 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 8min 8secs
TITLE: 03/15 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Aligning
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Corey
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 45mph Gusts, 31mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.09 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.45 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
IFO is LOCKING at INITIAL_ALIGNMENT
H1 was doing an initial alignment when I entered. Wind speeds are extremeley high (50mph), with microseism increasing in the last 8 hours.
We will likely not be able to lock until wind calms down, which is only forecast to happen in a few hours/once wind gets below 30mph.
TITLE: 03/15 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 143Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY: Mostly quiet shift with one lockloss and a fully automated relock. I also had to reset the SQZ angle when it ran away. H1 has been locked for 20 minutes.
Lockloss @ 03:42 UTC - link to lockloss tool
M5.5 earthquake out of southern Mexico (seismon lists this as nearby Guatemala). Entered earthquake mode one minute before the lockloss, although peakmon only reached up to around 600 counts.
After waiting for the EQ to pass, H1 relocked automatically without the need for an initial alignment and returned to observing at 04:46 UTC.
Ryan S, Ibrahim, Oli, Sheila, Camilla, Mayank
Problem: The ADF_OMC_TRANS_SQZ_ANG (ADF readback of Sqz angle) was not linear with the SQZ angle (~ SQZ-CLF_REFL_RF6_PHASE_PHASEDEG).
What we tried so far?
What we did ?
Channel name | Before Value | Modified value |
H1:SQZ-ADF_VCXO_PLL_PHASE | 25 | 55 |
H1:SQZ-ADF_OMC_TRANS_PHASE | -107 | -117 |
H1:SQZ-ADF_OMC_TRANS_DEMOD_I_OFFSET | 0 | -0.3 |
H1:SQZ-ADF_OMC_TRANS_DEMOD_Q_OFFSET | 0 | -1.0 |
H1:SQZ-ADF_OMC_TRANS_Q_NORM | 0 | 4.5 |
We may further tweak the parameters to improve the ADF performance.
Following alog 83343 (transmission VS AOI of a mirror that's supposed to be O3 ZM2), Rahul and I did a similar measurement for the old ZM1 for P-pol at 1064nm. Unlike "ZM2 optic", this one looks good.
Currently, proposed layout for POPX TT looks to have the AOI between 30 and 35 deg, and an alternate proposal is somewhat larger than that but smaller than 45 deg. Either way this old ZM1 optic will work.
AOI (deg) | power in transmission [W] | background [W] | trans/input |
1.4 | 203m | ignore | 70% |
21.4 | 12.79m | ignore | 4.4% |
25.4 | 0.624m | ignore | 0.22% |
30.4 | 33.5u | 0.65u | 110 ppm |
35.4 | 9.6u | 0.7u | 31 ppm |
40.4 | 5.9u | 0.6u | 18 ppm |
45.4 | 1.7u | 0.5u | 4 ppm |
The first two attachments show the experimental setup. The entire TT assembly was put on a rotational stage. The TT suspension was locked during the measurement.
Before and after the measurements, the power of the beam impinging ZM1 was 293mW and 289mW respectively, so I used 2.9e-1W as the input.
AOI close to but not quite retro-reflection (our reference point) was estimated to be ~1.4deg by measuring the distance (~1+-1/8") between the incoming and the reflected beam ~21" away from the mirror surface: (1+-1/8)/21/2 * 180/pi = 1.4+-0.2 deg. (The reason why it's not set to zero+-0.2deg is because of silly mechanical interference we didn't bother to fix.)
At 45.4deg AOI, the beam might have been very close to the back of (or even getting clipped by) the adjustment screw for the eddy current damping magnet. I wasn't able to see the beam (1.7uW of blob is hard to see for anybody) so it's unclear. At least the beam position on the HR surface looked OK, so if the beam is clipped by the adjustment screw it might be unnecessarily long. I'll have another look with IR sensitive camera on Monday.
FAMIS 26367, last checked in alog83146
Infrequent and erratic motion seen on EX fan 2, as has been noted on past checks. All other fans behaving normally within noise thresholds.
Ryan S, Sheila, Camilla
Ryan found that ISC_LOCK was waiting fo SQZ_MANGER to get to FDS in INJECT_SQUEEZING, but SQZ_MANGER will not get there as is waiting for ISC_LOCK (the SQZ_ANG_SERVO won't start until after OMC_WHITENING). This was wasting time. Made the attached edit and ISC_LOCK moved through INJECT_SQUEEZING much quicker.
TITLE: 03/14 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan S
SHIFT SUMMARY:
IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING as of 23:14 UTC (2 min lock!)
A calm shift with a very successful comissioning period where we were locked for the entire 6 hour comissioning block.
Our 22 hour lock was lost due to an ETM Glitch (lockloss alog 83375).
A summary of comissoning activities (alogs if possible):
1. SQZ: alog 83370 by SQZ Team (Camilla, Sheila, Mayank)
2. OPS: A2L Script alog 83373
3, PEM: Injections + Measurements (Robert)
4. ISC: Modulation Depth Step up/down (Elenna)
LOG:
Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14:49 | FAC | Optics Lab | Nellie | N | Technical Cleaning | 15:06 |
15:08 | PEM | Robert | LVEA | N | Turning amps on | 15:33 |
19:02 | PEM | Robert | LVEA | N | Shaker Move | 19:02 |
20:44 | SUS | Keita, Rahul | Optics Lab | N | PM1 Work | 22:13 |
21:02 | FAC | Mitchell, Jim | EX | N | EX Wind Fence Check | 22:12 |
21:17 | PEM | Robert | LVEA | N | Turning off amps and lights | 21:22 |
TITLE: 03/14 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 8mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.29 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: H1 just made it back to low noise as of 23:14 UTC after a fully automatic relock with an initial alignment.
ETM Glitch Lockloss. Relocking now.
During comissioning, I ran a2l script for all. Results and screenshots below.
ETMX P
Initial: 3.23
Final: 3.22
Diff: -0.01
ETMX Y
Initial: 4.9
Final: 4.95
Diff: 0.05
ETMY P
Initial: 5.52
Final: 5.4
Diff: -0.12
ETMY Y
Initial: 1.35
Final: 1.4
Diff: 0.05
ITMX P
Initial: -0.53
Final: -0.56
Diff: -0.03
ITMX Y
Initial: 3.21
Final: 3.24
Diff: 0.03
ITMY P
Initial: 0.06
Final: 0.02
Diff: -0.04
ITMY Y
Initial: -2.74
Final: -2.77
Diff: -0.03
Sheila, Camilla
NLG Measurements (follow 76542):
opo_grTrans_ setpoint_uW | Amplified Max | Amplified Min | UnAmp | Dark | NLG (usual) | NLG (maxmin) | OPO Gain |
120 | 0.05615 | 0.000255 | 0.000946 | 2.5e-5 | 61.0 | 62.7 | -12 |
110 | 0.03241 | 0.000273 | 35.2 | 35.4 | -11 | ||
90 | 0.01494 | 0.000288 | 16.2 | 16.8 | -9 | ||
70 | 0.008177 | 0.000319 | 8.9 | 9.2 | -7 | ||
40 | 0.003717 | 0.000392 | 4.0 | 4.2 | -4 | ||
25 | 0.002531 | 0.000464 | 2.7 | 2.8 | -2 | ||
80 | 0.010866 | 0.000302 | 11.8 | 12.2 | -8 |
For 25uW we needed to reduce H1:SQZ-OPO_PZT_1_SCAN_TRIGGER_CHANNEL_1_LEVEL from 0.5 to 0.25
FC2 is misaligned during this dataset. Aimed for 3m30 of data for each point.
In the Mean SQZ data, there was a strange peak around 300Hz, we checked if tis was seeding by moving H1:SQZ-LO_SERVO_SLOWOUTOFS, this made no difference
Type | Time (UTC) | NLG | SQZ dB @ 1kHz | Angle | DTT Ref |
No SQZ | 16:18:30 - 16:22:30 | N/A | N/A | ref 0 | |
ASQZ | 16:34:30 - 16:38:00 | 61 | 21.2 | (-)86 | ref1 |
ASQZ -10deg | 16:38:30 - 16:42:00 | 61 | 20.1 | (-)75 | ref2 |
SQZ | 16:45:00 - 16:48:30 | 61 | -4.5 | 166 | ref3 |
MSQZ | 16:49:00 - 16:52:30 | 61 | 18.6 | N/A | ref4 |
ASQZ | 17:04:30 - 17:08:00 | 35 | 19.2 | (-)88 | ref5 |
SQZ | 17:11:30 - 17:15:00 | 35 | -4.6 | 170 | ref6 |
MSQZ | 17:15:30 - 17:19:00 | 35 | 16.3 | N/A | ref7 |
ASQZ | 17:31:00 - 17:34:30 | 16 | 15.4 | (-)93 | ref8 |
SQZ | 17:38:00 - 17:41:30 | 16 | -4.6 | 157 | ref9 |
MSQZ | 17:42:00 - 17:45:30 | 16 | 12.4 | N/A | ref10 |
ASQZ | 17:55:30 - 17:59:00 | 9 | 12.5 | (-)96 | ref11 |
SQZ | 18:03:00 - 18:06:30 | 9 | -4.5 | 161 | ref12 |
MSQZ | 18:07:00 - 18:10:30 | 9 | 9.5 | N/A | ref13 |
ASQZ | 18:18:30 - 18:22:00 | 4 | 8.2 | (-)114 | ref14 |
SQZ | 18:25:00 - 18:28:30 | 4 | -3.9 | 155 | ref15 |
MSQZ | 18:29:00 - 18:32:30 | 4 | 5.5 | N/A | ref16 |
ASQZ | 18:48:00 - 18:51:30 | 2.7 | 5.9 | (-)115 | ref17 |
SQZ | 18:52:30 - 18:56:00 | 2.7 | -3.4 | 155 | ref18 |
MSQZ | 18:57:30 - 19:01:00 | 2.7 | 3.6 | N/A | ref19 |
Fri Mar 14 10:13:51 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 13min 48secs
I have recently reported that the “mystery” beam on the spool piece wall near HAM3 was coming from the direction of ITMX (82252). To further this investigation, I started photographing the area around the ITMs and BS as best I coluld through our viewports (there is not a good view towards HAM3). I found several unexpected distributions of light in the vertex:
1. 20 degree conical annular beams from ITMs
Both ITMX/CPX (Figure 1) and ITMY/CPY (Figure 3) cast an expanding annular “beam” towards the BS with a cone half angle of roughly 20 degrees from the main beam. My best guess is that it is produced by arm cavity light hitting the bevel of the ITMs (see cartoon in Figure 1). A good test of this would be to install the new test mass cage baffles at one or more of the ITMs at LLO (presuming Anamaria finds this beam at LLO) this upcoming break. The baffle should hide the bevel and eliminate the ring of light.
2. 45 degree conical annular beams from BS
The BS appears to cast an expanding annular “beam” with a cone half angle of 45 degrees, centered around the -X, -Y direction (Figure 2), and likely another annular beam, also with a half angle of 45 degrees, centered around the -X, +Y direction (evidence in Figure 3). I tried to find a geometry where the bevels were also the source of these beams but didn’t. My best guess is that the annular cone is produced by reflections of light from PR3 and the ITMs off of the inner surface of the circular cage around the BS, or the inside surface of the circular barrel of the BS itself (see drawings on third page of Figure 2).
3. Reflection of BS in ITM elliptical baffles likely visible at ITMY and HAM3
The BS beam spot is reflected towards ITMY by the slanted piece of the ITMX elliptical baffle (Figure 3). While the actual beam is not reflected towards ITMY (it isn’t clipped), the baffle reflects light towards ITMY that is scattered out of the main beam by only a few degrees.
Similar images were taken at LLO for comparison (see Alog 75626)