Displaying reports 21-40 of 86094.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End
Reports until 23:56, Thursday 18 December 2025
H1 TCS
matthewrichard.todd@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:56, Thursday 18 December 2025 (88606)
CHETA build log -- Thursday 12/18

M. Todd, G. Vajente, L. Dartez


Thursday 12/18

  1. We compared the beam profile that we fit to the modeled beam in that region, as well as what both of these beams look like at the ITM. We were initially very confused so we went back and more carefully placed the optics, taking care of the of and between the lenses in the telescope.
  2. It seemed that the astigmatism was much worse than anticipated so we thought about tilting one of the lenses and seeing if we could compensate for the astigmatism. This gave us pretty confusing results, and especially because the fit to the first dataset was yielding non-physical values. For reference, the fit is done by fitting a quadratic to the beam radius squared as a function of z (i.e. w2 = a+bz+cz2).
  3. After deliberating in the control room, and returning to corroborate the fintrace model with jammt, we came to the conclusion that the telescope model is sensible; however, the measurement that we were taking is not descriptive enough of the beam to understand how the active telescope performs.
  4. We finally decided to go in and take out the pick off to get as close of beam profile measurements to the waist of the beam after L2. We then shifted L2 5cm back toward the laser which was closer to the nominal position in the modeled layout. Here are the two plots of those beam profiles with their fits (I used a quadratic allowing M2 to vary, Gabriele has plots of minimized error of a Gaussian beam). L2 5cm further from M1 than the model. L2 close to model nominal position.
Images attached to this report
LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:36, Thursday 18 December 2025 - last comment - 16:38, Thursday 18 December 2025(88603)
OPS Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 12/19 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY:

IFO is in IDLE for PLANNED ENGINEERING

Summary of activities today:

LOG:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
15:57 SAF LASER LVEA YES LVEA is LASER HAZARD \u0d26\u0d4d\u0d26\u0d3f (\u2022O\u2022) 10:51
15:46 FAC Tyler and Crane Tech LVEA Y Crane upgrades south Bay 18:33
15:59 FAC Kim, Nellie LVEA Y Technical cleaning 16:46
16:09 FAC TJ LVEA Y Dust Monitor 10 Check 16:46
17:22 JAC Masayuki Optics Lab N JAC Work 19:18
17:35 FAC Kim MX N Technical Cleaning 18:32
17:40 SQZ Sheila, Robert LVEA Y Hunting for scattered light 19:35
17:46 PEM Jim, Randy LVEA Y PEM Support Tube Plate Check 18:15
17:51 SQZ Eric, Daniel LVEA Y Scattered light checks 19:35
17:57 TCS Matt Vac Prep Lab N Cheeta 19:09
18:17 SQZ Jennie LVEA Y HAM7 work 18:30
18:29 ISC Betsy Optics lab N Checks 19:18
20:44 ISC Betsy LVEA HAM1 Y Open light pipe, HAM1 work 22:37
20:56 FAC Crane contractor LVEA Y Crane inspections 00:55
21:08 SQZ Daniel, Eric, Kar Meng LVEA Y HAM 7 OPO 00:03
21:09 PCAL Tony PCAL N Transfer Meas. 22:30
21:09   Keita LVEA Y Checking in with Betsy 21:37
21:15 FAC Randy LVEA Y Checking on crane man 21:42
21:17 IAS Jason LVEA Y FARO Work BSC2 23:17
21:20 IAS' Ryan C LVEA Y FARO BSC2 23:20
21:29 TCS Matt Vac-Prep Lab N Cheeta\\ 00:07
21:48 PSL Jean-Rene, Alicia LVEA Y PSL Camera disconnect 01:46
21:50 ISC Richard LVEA Y Check on activities 23:42
21:55   Masayuki LVEA N Beam dump assembly 22:37
22:03 SQZ Sheila LVEA Y HAM7 OPO 00:00
22:53   Richard LVEA Y Checking on activities 23:41
22:57 FAC Tyler LVEA Y Crane upgrade wrap up 23:09
23:09 SUS Rahul LVEA Y HAM1 20:09
23:25 FAC Richard LVEA N Checks 00:07
23:28 PCAL Tony PCAL Lab N Setting up a measurement 22:28
23:37 SEI Jim LVEA Y HAM2 HEPI 00:06
00:07 ISC Keita LVEA Y Opening Light Pipe 02:07
00:24 JAC Jennie Vac-Prep Lab N Putting stuff away 01:24
00:35 SQZ Daniel, Eric LVEA N HAM7 Work 01:35
Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 16:38, Thursday 18 December 2025 (88604)

00:38 UTC Keita reports the PSL light pipe is closed and he took the IMC to offline.

H1 SQZ
eric.oelker@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:28, Thursday 18 December 2025 (88602)
HAM7 Realignment progress

[Daniel, Kar Meng, Eric, Sheila]

This afternoon, we continued with the realignment of the VIP after the VOPO swap.  When we first started, we briefly lost the CLF input alignment between the fiber and the VOPO cavity.  It turned out that the collimator was loose in the mount.  We took out the collimator holder and noticed that the 2nd grub screw hadn't been tightened all the way.  After fixing, we realigned the cavity till we could see a reasonably strong beam in transmission while the cavity was scanning.  

We then began the painful process of aligning the weak transmitted beam through the various components in HAM 7.  Using only the first steering mirror between the VOPO and SFI1 on the VIP, we managed to get the beam roughly aligned up to FC1.  However, we couldn't quite figure out how to get the return beam from the filter cavity retroreflected through SFI1 again.  We eventually decided to move FC1 a bit to get the beam back through SFI1, through SFI2, and onto the iris right before ZM4.  We're thinking of doing the following to finish the alignment process:

H1 SUS (PSL, SUS)
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:41, Thursday 18 December 2025 - last comment - 07:33, Friday 19 December 2025(88599)
HAM1 vent work - JM1 and JM3 plugged in to the electronics chain - OLC re-taken and offsets applied on the medm screen

Betsy, Rahul

We found that SUS JM1 had a faulty quadrupus cable, which we replaced it today. Next, I took OLC for both JM1 and JM3 in HAM1 chamber. I applied the offsets, gains and then centered the BOSEMs - and they look good. Next, I will start checking the health of the electronics chain and the suspension itself (i.e. by taking the transfer function measurements).

The offsets and gain for JM1 is recorded in this screenshot - accepted in the SDF (safe).

The offsets and gain for JM3 is recorded in this screenshot - accepted in the SDF (safe).

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - 15:54, Thursday 18 December 2025 (88600)

Oli, Rahul

We started damping both the suspensions - found that the voltmons were not working (Dave found that their gains were set to zero). 

With voltmons ON, both the suspensions were damping fine - no overflows on this 28bit DAC. 

rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - 15:59, Thursday 18 December 2025 (88601)

Adding pictures of JM1 and JM3 I took today.

Images attached to this comment
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 07:33, Friday 19 December 2025 (88607)EPO

Tagging EPO for JM photos

H1 AOS (IOO, ISC, PSL)
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:23, Thursday 18 December 2025 - last comment - 16:42, Thursday 18 December 2025(88598)
HAM1/2 beam positions with 2W (Betsy, Keita)

For the upcoming ISS array swap, we plan to bypass the IMC, which is known to be a pain, but we need a stable beam for the array alignment.

Once the corner volume is vent, we use the QPD on the old array and IMC-IM4_TRANS as the initial reference for bypassing the IMC. Once IMC is bypassed, we will center REFL WFS BEFORE removing the old array and record the RM1/RM2 PIT and YAW. This way, even if we somehow suspect e.g. the pointing of the beam going to the IM4 moved after removing the old array, we can still restore the pointing by looking at the REFL WFSs in addition to IM4.

We measured the beam positions on these QPDs today even though we'll repeat this later.

IFO configuration:

Arrow ("->") means before and after the REFL centering servo (DC1 and DC2) was turned ON:

  PSL-ISS_SECONDLOOP_QPD IMC-IM4_TRANS ASC-REFL_A_DC ASC-REFL_B_DC SUS-RM1-M1_DAMP INMON SUS-RM1-M1_DAMP INMON
PIT -0.814 0.366 -0.884 -> 0 -0.995 -> 0 293 -> 168 -363 -> 68
YAW 0.655 -0.146 0.590 -> 0 0.220 -> 0 -176 -> -214 277 -> -70

Septum cover is left OFF but the PSL light pipe was closed after this. REFL centering was turned off but I didn't bother to offload the ASC output to RM sliders.

REFL WFS nubmers as of now are not super meaningful as we'll still have to lock HAM2 down, which potentially change the relative alignment between HAM1 and HAM2. (But it's good that the beam is still hitting REFL WFSs after HAM1 was locked down even though Jim noted that the ISI position of HAM1 is not good. )

I'll open the light pipe tomorrow and quickly repeat the measurement after Jim locks down HAM2 HEPI.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 16:42, Thursday 18 December 2025 (88605)

Jim locked HAM2 HEPI today. I opened the PSL light pipe and locked IMC, and the beam was already reasonable on REFL WFSs without centering servo.

I'm convinced at this point that Jim does a good job that the angle change won't be large enough to lose the beam in HAM1 even after Jim locks down HAM2 in air. We will very likely find the beam on REFL WFSs after bypassing the IMC using ISS array QPD and IM4 trans. 

As before, "->" means before and after the refl centering was turned ON.

  ASC-REFL_A_DC ASC-REFL_B_DC SUS-RM1_M1_DAMP INMON SUS-RM2_M1_DAMP INMON
PIT 0 -> 0 -0.39 -> 0 190 -> 174 108 -> 14
YAW 0 -> 0 0.07 -> 0 -210 -> -214 -69 -> -59

After this, 

  • Light pipe was closed.
  • Septum cover is left OFF.
  • IMC was taken offline.
  • Centering servo was turned off (again no offloading to the RM sliders).
H1 PEM (PEM)
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:31, Thursday 18 December 2025 (88597)
Checking HVAC Fans - Weekly FAMIS 27648

Closes FAMIS 27648, last checked in alog 88314

Trends look fine!

Images attached to this report
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:22, Thursday 18 December 2025 (88591)
Thu CP1 Fill

Thu Dec 18 10:10:58 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 10min 55secs

 

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:14, Thursday 18 December 2025 (88590)
JM3 and PM1 OSEMINF and WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM satamp compensation filters updated to compensate for newly swapped satamp

Rahul, Oli

Fil swapped out the JM3 / PM1 satamp this morning (88588) to the modified satamp (modified for ECR E2400330). I used my script python3 sustrunk/Common/PythonTools/satampswap_bestpossible_filterupdate_ECR_E2400330.py -o JM3 PM1 to update the satamp compensation filters in the OSEMINF and WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM filter banks from 10:0.4 to the precise compensations for each OSEM.

I loaded these filters in and committed thefilter file as r34282.

Note that the satamp swap and the satamp compensation value update will change the perceived location of the OSEM OUTs

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS (CDS, SUS)
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:42, Thursday 18 December 2025 - last comment - 11:00, Thursday 18 December 2025(88588)
HAM1: JM3 (JAC) and PM1 Satamps replaced (in LVEA), JM2 and JM3 cables swapped (in CER)

Fil, Rahul

This morning we replaced the unmodified Satamps for JM3/PM1 (both TT suspension) with the modified version - as per alog 88584. Given below are the details,

Old satamp s/n - S1200173

New Satamp s/n - S2500407

The adc counts of the bosems on JM3 and PM1 have dropped by 25% approximately due to the above change, hence we will have to compensate that on the filter side (Oli is currently on it). 

Also, we have swapped the cables for JM2 (mount) with JM3 (SUS TT) in the CER - as per alog 88584, this is now consistent with the wiring diagram.

Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 10:09, Thursday 18 December 2025 (88589)

A plot of some OSEM values before and after the satamp swap for PM1.

Images attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 11:00, Thursday 18 December 2025 (88593)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S2500407, assigned to JM3 / PM1 M1's ULURLLLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a US 8CH sat amp, D1002818 / D080276. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
plotresponse_S2500407_H1_JM3PM1_M1_ULLLURLUR_20250915.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are:

Optic  Stage  Serial_Number  Channel_Number  OSEM_Name  Zero_Pole_Hz  R_TIA_kOhm  Foton_Design 
JM3 M1 S2500407 CH1 UL 0.0927:5.07 -121 zpk([5.07],[0.0927],1,"n")
      CH2 UR 0.0949:5.18 -121 zpk([5.18],[0.0949],1,"n")
      CH3 LL 0.0949:5.19 -121 zpk([5.19],[0.0949],1,"n")
      CH4 LR 0.0955:5.22 -121 zpk([5.22],[0.0955],1,"n")
PM1 M1   CH5 UL 0.0931:5.09 -121 zpk([5.09],[0.0931],1,"n")
      CH6 UR 0.0942:5.15 -121 zpk([5.15],[0.0942],1,"n")
      CH7 LL 0.0935:5.105 -121 zpk([5.105],[0.0935],1,"n")
      CH8 LR 0.0969:5.29 -121 zpk([5.29],[0.0969],1,"n")

The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/
2025-09-15_USDualSatAmp_S2500407_D080276-v3_fitresults.txt

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), Jeff nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%, shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.

LHO FMCS
eric.otterman@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:43, Thursday 18 December 2025 (88587)
Mid Station chilled water trending
I ran the pumps at the mid stations this morning to exercise the bearings and seals. This will result in an increase to the glycol loop temperatures in the trending. This increase will return to normal by the end of the week. 
LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:42, Thursday 18 December 2025 (88586)
OPS Day Shift Start

TITLE: 12/18 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: MAINTENANCE
    Wind: 13mph Gusts, 10mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.06 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.36 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

IFO is in IDLE for PLANNED ENGINEERING

A look at today's activities (extends to Fri)

 

H1 TCS
matthewrichard.todd@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:56, Wednesday 17 December 2025 (88585)
CHETA build log -- Wednesday 12/17

M. Todd, G. Vajente, L. Dartez


Wednesday 12/17

  1. Additional optics mounted
    1. ZnSe 2” lens
    2. 2” silver and gold flipper mirrors (not installed)
    3. Additional beam dump for reflection of Polarizer2
  2. We had the PD chassis milled out further to take an offset out that prevented the board from sitting flush.
  3. We noticed that the coating had been burned on the first beam sampler we got from EdmundOptics. Emailed vendor to ask if this is common, because the power density is not at all expected to have produced this.
  4. We also took beam profiles with a rail installed to get a fit of the beam evolution between M2 and M3. I made a fit of the data, assuming that M2 was perfect (I was having trouble with the nonlinear fit without M2=1, will revisit).

To do tomorrow:

  1. Try and compare the lens solution to the fitted q we have from measurements.
  2. Try and set up the coaligned visible laser

--- Horizontal (A1) Fit ---

  Data range: z = [339.0, 897.8] mm

  Beam radii: [1525.0, 2150.0] µm

  Fixing M² = 1

  Fit converged: w₀=1034.2 µm, z₀=-465.0 mm, M²=1.00 (fixed)

BeamFitResult(w0=1034.2±49.9 µm, z0=-465.0±33.9 mm, M²=1.00±0.00)

 

--- Vertical (A2) Fit ---

  Data range: z = [339.0, 897.8] mm

  Beam radii: [1138.5, 1825.2] µm

  Fixing M² = 1

  Fit converged: w₀=828.8 µm, z₀=-80.0 mm, M²=1.00 (fixed)

BeamFitResult(w0=828.8±32.5 µm, z0=-80.0±21.1 mm, M²=1.00±0.00)

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS (CDS)
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:18, Wednesday 17 December 2025 - last comment - 11:03, Thursday 18 December 2025(88584)
JM1 and JM3 filter banks populated to align with current electronics

Fil, Oli

The JM1 and JM3 filter banks were populated, with some things that need updates found along the way.

JM1 and JM3 were populated based on PM1's filter banks. The only banks that aren't the same as PM1 are the OSEMINF and WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM satamp compensation filter modules and the COILOUTF filter modules.

First, I filled out all the filter banks as a direct copy of PM1 using python3 /ligo/home/oli.patane/Documents/WIP/copySUSfilters.py PM1_M1 JM1_M1 (then replacing JM1 with JM3). This script copies over the filter modules in OSEMINF, COILOUTF, WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM, WD_OSEMAC_RMSLP, LOCK, and DAMP filter banks. However, the OSEMINF,  WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM, and COILOUTF filter banks are not the same as PM1, so those need to be updated.

OSEMINF and WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM filter banks
In November (88162) the JAC electronics were installed and the satamps that were suppposed to be installed were S2500406 for JM1 and S2500407 for JM3 / PM1. Both of these are modified satamps per ECR E2400330. JM1 had the correct satamp installed but JM3 / PM1 had S1200173 installed instead, which is not modified and has a different frequency response. 
JM1 - JM1 has the correct updated satamp, which Jeff measured the frequency response for each chassis' channels for, so I updated the compensation filters for JM1 with the exact compensation based on the measurements for each channel. I ran python3 sustrunk/Common/PythonTools/satampswap_bestpossible_filterupdate_ECR_E2400330.py -o JM1 to fill out each OSEMINF FM1 and WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM FM6.
JM3 / PM1 - On the flip side, the compensation filters for JM3 and PM1 are the same as what PM1's have been - 10:0.4: zpk(10:0.4:1) in OSEMINF FM1 and WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM FM6.

COILOUTF filter banks
The coil driver for JM1 is S1106042, and the coil driver for JM3 is S2500411.
The PM1 coil drivers have had ECR E2200307 done, which affects the filter in FM6, and I've been searching to see if I can verify whether the JM coil drivers have had this (or the expansion ECRs, E2200307 or E2400048) done to them.
JM1 - The e-traveler doesn't mention it having been modified, just that it was taken out of production and replaced with a modified one (64166). I haven't been able to find anything anywhere that mentions that it ended up getting modified, so I am inclined to think that it might not have this modificiation. Thus, for now I am installing the filters that work for the unmodified driver. These filters are:
    - AntiLPM1: zpk([0.9;211.883],[9.99999;20.9999],1,"n")
JM3 - The e-traveler for the driver says that it's been modified per T2100410, which is the modification that is done as part of the ECRs mentioned above, so JM3 coil driver is modified and thus has the same AntiLPM1 filters as PM1. These filters are:
    - AntiLPM1: zpk([0.5;3174],[52.32;50.77],1,"n")

JM1 OSEMINF, WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM, and COILOUTF filter banksCOILOUTF AntiLPM1 foton

JM3 OSEMINF, WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM, and COILOUTF filter banksCOILOUTF AntiLPM1 foton

All of these filters have been loaded in and commited to svn as r34277.
We are hoping that the modifications they are supposed to have will be able to be done soon.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 11:03, Thursday 18 December 2025 (88594)

Below is the satamp and compensation into for the JM1 satamp:

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S2500406, assigned to JM1 / JM2 M1's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a US 8CH sat amp, D1002818 / D080276. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
plotresponse_S2500406_H1_JM1PM2_M1_ULLLURLUR_20250915.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are:

Optic  Stage  Serial_Number  Channel_Number  OSEM_Name  Zero_Pole_Hz  R_TIA_kOhm  Foton_Design 
JM1 M1 S2500406 CH1 UL 0.0937:5.115 -121 zpk([5.115],[0.0937],1,"n")
      CH2 LL 0.0954:5.21 -121 zpk([5.21],[0.0954],1,"n")
      CH3 UR 0.0942:5.145 -121 zpk([5.145],[0.0942],1,"n")
      CH4 LR 0.0934:5.1 -121 zpk([5.1],[0.0934],1,"n")
JM2 M1   CH5 UL 0.0929:5.08 -121 zpk([5.08],[0.0929],1,"n")
      CH6 LL 0.0963:5.26 -121 zpk([5.26],[0.0963],1,"n")
      CH7 UR 0.0945:5.16 -121 zpk([5.16],[0.0945],1,"n")
      CH8 LR 0.0967:5.28 -121 zpk([5.28],[0.0967],1,"n")

The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/
2025-09-15_USDualSatAmp_S2500406_D080276-v3_fitresults.txt

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), Jeff nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%, shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.

H1 SUS
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:23, Wednesday 17 December 2025 - last comment - 13:19, Thursday 18 December 2025(88573)
SATMON updated for new 28bit DACs

I've updated the saturation thresholds on SATMON for the following suspensions which have had their DAC cards upgraded to 28bit earlier this week. I still have to add JM1 and JM3.

RM1 (M1)

RM2 (M1)

PM1 (M1)

IM{1,2,3,4} (M1)

PRM (M1, M2, M3)

PR3 (M1, M2, M3)

 

Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 13:19, Thursday 18 December 2025 (88596)OpsInfo

I added JM1 and JM3 to the SATMON screen, I also did some rearranging of the screen to better match the IFO layout, like in ASC IFO_ALIGN_COMPACTEST.adl

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 21-40 of 86094.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End