M. Todd, G. Vajente, L. Dartez
TITLE: 12/19 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY:
IFO is in IDLE for PLANNED ENGINEERING
Summary of activities today:
LOG:
| Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15:57 | SAF | LASER | LVEA | YES | LVEA is LASER HAZARD \u0d26\u0d4d\u0d26\u0d3f (\u2022O\u2022) | 10:51 |
| 15:46 | FAC | Tyler and Crane Tech | LVEA | Y | Crane upgrades south Bay | 18:33 |
| 15:59 | FAC | Kim, Nellie | LVEA | Y | Technical cleaning | 16:46 |
| 16:09 | FAC | TJ | LVEA | Y | Dust Monitor 10 Check | 16:46 |
| 17:22 | JAC | Masayuki | Optics Lab | N | JAC Work | 19:18 |
| 17:35 | FAC | Kim | MX | N | Technical Cleaning | 18:32 |
| 17:40 | SQZ | Sheila, Robert | LVEA | Y | Hunting for scattered light | 19:35 |
| 17:46 | PEM | Jim, Randy | LVEA | Y | PEM Support Tube Plate Check | 18:15 |
| 17:51 | SQZ | Eric, Daniel | LVEA | Y | Scattered light checks | 19:35 |
| 17:57 | TCS | Matt | Vac Prep Lab | N | Cheeta | 19:09 |
| 18:17 | SQZ | Jennie | LVEA | Y | HAM7 work | 18:30 |
| 18:29 | ISC | Betsy | Optics lab | N | Checks | 19:18 |
| 20:44 | ISC | Betsy | LVEA HAM1 | Y | Open light pipe, HAM1 work | 22:37 |
| 20:56 | FAC | Crane contractor | LVEA | Y | Crane inspections | 00:55 |
| 21:08 | SQZ | Daniel, Eric, Kar Meng | LVEA | Y | HAM 7 OPO | 00:03 |
| 21:09 | PCAL | Tony | PCAL | N | Transfer Meas. | 22:30 |
| 21:09 | Keita | LVEA | Y | Checking in with Betsy | 21:37 | |
| 21:15 | FAC | Randy | LVEA | Y | Checking on crane man | 21:42 |
| 21:17 | IAS | Jason | LVEA | Y | FARO Work BSC2 | 23:17 |
| 21:20 | IAS' | Ryan C | LVEA | Y | FARO BSC2 | 23:20 |
| 21:29 | TCS | Matt | Vac-Prep Lab | N | Cheeta\\ | 00:07 |
| 21:48 | PSL | Jean-Rene, Alicia | LVEA | Y | PSL Camera disconnect | 01:46 |
| 21:50 | ISC | Richard | LVEA | Y | Check on activities | 23:42 |
| 21:55 | Masayuki | LVEA | N | Beam dump assembly | 22:37 | |
| 22:03 | SQZ | Sheila | LVEA | Y | HAM7 OPO | 00:00 |
| 22:53 | Richard | LVEA | Y | Checking on activities | 23:41 | |
| 22:57 | FAC | Tyler | LVEA | Y | Crane upgrade wrap up | 23:09 |
| 23:09 | SUS | Rahul | LVEA | Y | HAM1 | 20:09 |
| 23:25 | FAC | Richard | LVEA | N | Checks | 00:07 |
| 23:28 | PCAL | Tony | PCAL Lab | N | Setting up a measurement | 22:28 |
| 23:37 | SEI | Jim | LVEA | Y | HAM2 HEPI | 00:06 |
| 00:07 | ISC | Keita | LVEA | Y | Opening Light Pipe | 02:07 |
| 00:24 | JAC | Jennie | Vac-Prep Lab | N | Putting stuff away | 01:24 |
| 00:35 | SQZ | Daniel, Eric | LVEA | N | HAM7 Work | 01:35 |
00:38 UTC Keita reports the PSL light pipe is closed and he took the IMC to offline.
[Daniel, Kar Meng, Eric, Sheila]
This afternoon, we continued with the realignment of the VIP after the VOPO swap. When we first started, we briefly lost the CLF input alignment between the fiber and the VOPO cavity. It turned out that the collimator was loose in the mount. We took out the collimator holder and noticed that the 2nd grub screw hadn't been tightened all the way. After fixing, we realigned the cavity till we could see a reasonably strong beam in transmission while the cavity was scanning.
We then began the painful process of aligning the weak transmitted beam through the various components in HAM 7. Using only the first steering mirror between the VOPO and SFI1 on the VIP, we managed to get the beam roughly aligned up to FC1. However, we couldn't quite figure out how to get the return beam from the filter cavity retroreflected through SFI1 again. We eventually decided to move FC1 a bit to get the beam back through SFI1, through SFI2, and onto the iris right before ZM4. We're thinking of doing the following to finish the alignment process:
Betsy, Rahul
We found that SUS JM1 had a faulty quadrupus cable, which we replaced it today. Next, I took OLC for both JM1 and JM3 in HAM1 chamber. I applied the offsets, gains and then centered the BOSEMs - and they look good. Next, I will start checking the health of the electronics chain and the suspension itself (i.e. by taking the transfer function measurements).
The offsets and gain for JM1 is recorded in this screenshot - accepted in the SDF (safe).
The offsets and gain for JM3 is recorded in this screenshot - accepted in the SDF (safe).
Oli, Rahul
We started damping both the suspensions - found that the voltmons were not working (Dave found that their gains were set to zero).
With voltmons ON, both the suspensions were damping fine - no overflows on this 28bit DAC.
Adding pictures of JM1 and JM3 I took today.
Tagging EPO for JM photos
For the upcoming ISS array swap, we plan to bypass the IMC, which is known to be a pain, but we need a stable beam for the array alignment.
Once the corner volume is vent, we use the QPD on the old array and IMC-IM4_TRANS as the initial reference for bypassing the IMC. Once IMC is bypassed, we will center REFL WFS BEFORE removing the old array and record the RM1/RM2 PIT and YAW. This way, even if we somehow suspect e.g. the pointing of the beam going to the IM4 moved after removing the old array, we can still restore the pointing by looking at the REFL WFSs in addition to IM4.
We measured the beam positions on these QPDs today even though we'll repeat this later.
IFO configuration:
Arrow ("->") means before and after the REFL centering servo (DC1 and DC2) was turned ON:
| PSL-ISS_SECONDLOOP_QPD | IMC-IM4_TRANS | ASC-REFL_A_DC | ASC-REFL_B_DC | SUS-RM1-M1_DAMP INMON | SUS-RM1-M1_DAMP INMON | |
| PIT | -0.814 | 0.366 | -0.884 -> 0 | -0.995 -> 0 | 293 -> 168 | -363 -> 68 |
| YAW | 0.655 | -0.146 | 0.590 -> 0 | 0.220 -> 0 | -176 -> -214 | 277 -> -70 |
Septum cover is left OFF but the PSL light pipe was closed after this. REFL centering was turned off but I didn't bother to offload the ASC output to RM sliders.
REFL WFS nubmers as of now are not super meaningful as we'll still have to lock HAM2 down, which potentially change the relative alignment between HAM1 and HAM2. (But it's good that the beam is still hitting REFL WFSs after HAM1 was locked down even though Jim noted that the ISI position of HAM1 is not good. )
I'll open the light pipe tomorrow and quickly repeat the measurement after Jim locks down HAM2 HEPI.
Jim locked HAM2 HEPI today. I opened the PSL light pipe and locked IMC, and the beam was already reasonable on REFL WFSs without centering servo.
I'm convinced at this point that Jim does a good job that the angle change won't be large enough to lose the beam in HAM1 even after Jim locks down HAM2 in air. We will very likely find the beam on REFL WFSs after bypassing the IMC using ISS array QPD and IM4 trans.
As before, "->" means before and after the refl centering was turned ON.
| ASC-REFL_A_DC | ASC-REFL_B_DC | SUS-RM1_M1_DAMP INMON | SUS-RM2_M1_DAMP INMON | |
| PIT | 0 -> 0 | -0.39 -> 0 | 190 -> 174 | 108 -> 14 |
| YAW | 0 -> 0 | 0.07 -> 0 | -210 -> -214 | -69 -> -59 |
After this,
Closes FAMIS 27648, last checked in alog 88314
Trends look fine!
Thu Dec 18 10:10:58 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 10min 55secs
Rahul, Oli
Fil swapped out the JM3 / PM1 satamp this morning (88588) to the modified satamp (modified for ECR E2400330). I used my script python3 sustrunk/Common/PythonTools/satampswap_bestpossible_filterupdate_ECR_E2400330.py -o JM3 PM1 to update the satamp compensation filters in the OSEMINF and WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM filter banks from 10:0.4 to the precise compensations for each OSEM.
I loaded these filters in and committed thefilter file as r34282.
Note that the satamp swap and the satamp compensation value update will change the perceived location of the OSEM OUTs
Fil, Rahul
This morning we replaced the unmodified Satamps for JM3/PM1 (both TT suspension) with the modified version - as per alog 88584. Given below are the details,
Old satamp s/n - S1200173
New Satamp s/n - S2500407
The adc counts of the bosems on JM3 and PM1 have dropped by 25% approximately due to the above change, hence we will have to compensate that on the filter side (Oli is currently on it).
Also, we have swapped the cables for JM2 (mount) with JM3 (SUS TT) in the CER - as per alog 88584, this is now consistent with the wiring diagram.
A plot of some OSEM values before and after the satamp swap for PM1.
Here's the characterization data and fit results for S2500407, assigned to JM3 / PM1 M1's ULURLLLR OSEMs.
This sat amp is a US 8CH sat amp, D1002818 / D080276. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.
The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
plotresponse_S2500407_H1_JM3PM1_M1_ULLLURLUR_20250915.m
Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are:
| Optic | Stage | Serial_Number | Channel_Number | OSEM_Name | Zero_Pole_Hz | R_TIA_kOhm | Foton_Design |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JM3 | M1 | S2500407 | CH1 | UL | 0.0927:5.07 | -121 | zpk([5.07],[0.0927],1,"n") |
| CH2 | UR | 0.0949:5.18 | -121 | zpk([5.18],[0.0949],1,"n") | |||
| CH3 | LL | 0.0949:5.19 | -121 | zpk([5.19],[0.0949],1,"n") | |||
| CH4 | LR | 0.0955:5.22 | -121 | zpk([5.22],[0.0955],1,"n") | |||
| PM1 | M1 | CH5 | UL | 0.0931:5.09 | -121 | zpk([5.09],[0.0931],1,"n") | |
| CH6 | UR | 0.0942:5.15 | -121 | zpk([5.15],[0.0942],1,"n") | |||
| CH7 | LL | 0.0935:5.105 | -121 | zpk([5.105],[0.0935],1,"n") | |||
| CH8 | LR | 0.0969:5.29 | -121 | zpk([5.29],[0.0969],1,"n") |
The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/
2025-09-15_USDualSatAmp_S2500407_D080276-v3_fitresults.txt
Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), Jeff nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%, shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
I ran the pumps at the mid stations this morning to exercise the bearings and seals. This will result in an increase to the glycol loop temperatures in the trending. This increase will return to normal by the end of the week.
TITLE: 12/18 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: MAINTENANCE
Wind: 13mph Gusts, 10mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.06 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.36 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
IFO is in IDLE for PLANNED ENGINEERING
A look at today's activities (extends to Fri)
M. Todd, G. Vajente, L. Dartez
To do tomorrow:
--- Horizontal (A1) Fit ---
Data range: z = [339.0, 897.8] mm
Beam radii: [1525.0, 2150.0] µm
Fixing M² = 1
Fit converged: w₀=1034.2 µm, z₀=-465.0 mm, M²=1.00 (fixed)
BeamFitResult(w0=1034.2±49.9 µm, z0=-465.0±33.9 mm, M²=1.00±0.00)
--- Vertical (A2) Fit ---
Data range: z = [339.0, 897.8] mm
Beam radii: [1138.5, 1825.2] µm
Fixing M² = 1
Fit converged: w₀=828.8 µm, z₀=-80.0 mm, M²=1.00 (fixed)
BeamFitResult(w0=828.8±32.5 µm, z0=-80.0±21.1 mm, M²=1.00±0.00)
Fil, Oli
The JM1 and JM3 filter banks were populated, with some things that need updates found along the way.
JM1 and JM3 were populated based on PM1's filter banks. The only banks that aren't the same as PM1 are the OSEMINF and WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM satamp compensation filter modules and the COILOUTF filter modules.
First, I filled out all the filter banks as a direct copy of PM1 using python3 /ligo/home/oli.patane/Documents/WIP/copySUSfilters.py PM1_M1 JM1_M1 (then replacing JM1 with JM3). This script copies over the filter modules in OSEMINF, COILOUTF, WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM, WD_OSEMAC_RMSLP, LOCK, and DAMP filter banks. However, the OSEMINF, WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM, and COILOUTF filter banks are not the same as PM1, so those need to be updated.
OSEMINF and WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM filter banks
In November (88162) the JAC electronics were installed and the satamps that were suppposed to be installed were S2500406 for JM1 and S2500407 for JM3 / PM1. Both of these are modified satamps per ECR E2400330. JM1 had the correct satamp installed but JM3 / PM1 had S1200173 installed instead, which is not modified and has a different frequency response.
JM1 - JM1 has the correct updated satamp, which Jeff measured the frequency response for each chassis' channels for, so I updated the compensation filters for JM1 with the exact compensation based on the measurements for each channel. I ran python3 sustrunk/Common/PythonTools/satampswap_bestpossible_filterupdate_ECR_E2400330.py -o JM1 to fill out each OSEMINF FM1 and WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM FM6.
JM3 / PM1 - On the flip side, the compensation filters for JM3 and PM1 are the same as what PM1's have been - 10:0.4: zpk(10:0.4:1) in OSEMINF FM1 and WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM FM6.
COILOUTF filter banks
The coil driver for JM1 is S1106042, and the coil driver for JM3 is S2500411.
The PM1 coil drivers have had ECR E2200307 done, which affects the filter in FM6, and I've been searching to see if I can verify whether the JM coil drivers have had this (or the expansion ECRs, E2200307 or E2400048) done to them.
JM1 - The e-traveler doesn't mention it having been modified, just that it was taken out of production and replaced with a modified one (64166). I haven't been able to find anything anywhere that mentions that it ended up getting modified, so I am inclined to think that it might not have this modificiation. Thus, for now I am installing the filters that work for the unmodified driver. These filters are:
- AntiLPM1: zpk([0.9;211.883],[9.99999;20.9999],1,"n")
JM3 - The e-traveler for the driver says that it's been modified per T2100410, which is the modification that is done as part of the ECRs mentioned above, so JM3 coil driver is modified and thus has the same AntiLPM1 filters as PM1. These filters are:
- AntiLPM1: zpk([0.5;3174],[52.32;50.77],1,"n")
JM1 OSEMINF, WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM, and COILOUTF filter banks, COILOUTF AntiLPM1 foton
JM3 OSEMINF, WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM, and COILOUTF filter banks, COILOUTF AntiLPM1 foton
All of these filters have been loaded in and commited to svn as r34277.
We are hoping that the modifications they are supposed to have will be able to be done soon.
Below is the satamp and compensation into for the JM1 satamp:
Here's the characterization data and fit results for S2500406, assigned to JM1 / JM2 M1's ULLLURLR OSEMs.
This sat amp is a US 8CH sat amp, D1002818 / D080276. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.
The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
plotresponse_S2500406_H1_JM1PM2_M1_ULLLURLUR_20250915.m
Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are:
| Optic | Stage | Serial_Number | Channel_Number | OSEM_Name | Zero_Pole_Hz | R_TIA_kOhm | Foton_Design |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JM1 | M1 | S2500406 | CH1 | UL | 0.0937:5.115 | -121 | zpk([5.115],[0.0937],1,"n") |
| CH2 | LL | 0.0954:5.21 | -121 | zpk([5.21],[0.0954],1,"n") | |||
| CH3 | UR | 0.0942:5.145 | -121 | zpk([5.145],[0.0942],1,"n") | |||
| CH4 | LR | 0.0934:5.1 | -121 | zpk([5.1],[0.0934],1,"n") | |||
| JM2 | M1 | CH5 | UL | 0.0929:5.08 | -121 | zpk([5.08],[0.0929],1,"n") | |
| CH6 | LL | 0.0963:5.26 | -121 | zpk([5.26],[0.0963],1,"n") | |||
| CH7 | UR | 0.0945:5.16 | -121 | zpk([5.16],[0.0945],1,"n") | |||
| CH8 | LR | 0.0967:5.28 | -121 | zpk([5.28],[0.0967],1,"n") |
The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/
2025-09-15_USDualSatAmp_S2500406_D080276-v3_fitresults.txt
Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), Jeff nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%, shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
I've updated the saturation thresholds on SATMON for the following suspensions which have had their DAC cards upgraded to 28bit earlier this week. I still have to add JM1 and JM3.
RM1 (M1)
RM2 (M1)
PM1 (M1)
IM{1,2,3,4} (M1)
PRM (M1, M2, M3)
PR3 (M1, M2, M3)