Displaying reports 601-620 of 83104.Go to page Start 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 End
Reports until 16:12, Tuesday 10 June 2025
H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:12, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84948)
Ops Eve Shift Start

TITLE: 06/10 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Commissioning
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Tony
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 16mph Gusts, 13mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.18 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

We are Locked and just finished another set of calibration measurements

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:44, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84944)
CARM OLG measured

Following instructions from 76751 I ran a CARM OLG measurement after we had been at high power for a bit more than 4 hours, see attached. The most recent comparison I can find for low noise is 80956, it looks like we would want to increase the gain by roughly 6dB to get back to a 17 kHz ugf as seen there.

Non-image files attached to this report
X1 SUS
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:38, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84942)
BBSS Transportation (Container, Support Plate and Lifting Bar) Tested

Randy, Ibrahim

Today, Randy an I fit checked the BBSS Structure Support Plate (D2500013) and the Lifting Bar Assembly (D1100802) for the BBSS. 

Overall, everything fit. See pictures below. Some relevant notes:

Images attached to this report
H1 SQZ
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:08, Tuesday 10 June 2025 - last comment - 10:33, Wednesday 11 June 2025(84941)
No SQZ Time

No SQZ time taken today, 21:47:00UTC to 21:59:00UTC.

Attached plot shows today (in black) compared to before the vent (orange) and last year (red).
Our no sqz now looks very similar to before the the vent apart form the increased jitter lines 300-700Hz (hopefully from HAM1 VAC pumps). Both 2025 plots are worse at high frequency and 40-70Hz compared to last years, maybe this could be an calibration artifact?
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - 10:33, Wednesday 11 June 2025 (84970)

2 Seconds of data in this data span is missing.
Our tools can't pull the entire time for this No SQZ ing time.
Johnathan has given us the 2 seconds that are missing from the data 12 minute data stretch.

"I don't have good news for you.  There is a 2s gap in there at 1433627912-1433627913 on H-H1_llhoft.  The H-H1_HOFT_C00 is worse, I don't see frames in the 1433627.... range at all." ~ Johnathan H.

We were able to salvage 674 seconds from this time that can be useful. 
Useful GPS time: 1433627238 -1433627912

 

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:58, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84943)
Wifi WAPs turned off, SDFs accepted

At the beginning of the vent in early April all the CDS WAPs were turned on and left on. The CDS SDF was updated to that configuration.

Today all but the MSR WAPs were power off, and we have returned to the O4 SDF configuration for these channels.

Images attached to this report
H1 CAL
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:46, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84940)
Second Cal Sweep ran after 1 hour 40 min of NLN lock.

running calibration sweep #2
pydarm measure --run-headless bb
2025-06-10 13:47:53,831 config file: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/ifo/pydarm_cmd_H1.yaml
2025-06-10 13:47:53,846 available measurements:
...
~ computer noises ~
...
notification: end of test
diag> save /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_BB/PCALY2DARM_BB_20250610T204753Z.xml
/ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_BB/PCALY2DARM_BB_20250610T204753Z.xml saved
diag> quit
EXIT KERNEL

2025-06-10 13:53:04,389 bb measurement complete.
2025-06-10 13:53:04,389 bb output: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_BB/PCALY2DARM_BB_20250610T204753Z.xml
2025-06-10 13:53:04,389 all measurements complete.


anthony.sanchez@cdsws29: gpstime;python /ligo/groups/cal/src/simulines/simulines/simuLines.py -i /ligo/groups/cal/H1/simulines_settings/newDARM_20231221/settings_h1_20250212.ini;gpstime
PDT: 2025-06-10 13:55:32.403757 PDT
UTC: 2025-06-10 20:55:32.403757 UTC
GPS: 1433624150.403757
2025-06-10 20:55:33,268 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/DARMOLG_SS/DARMOLG_SS_20250610T205533Z.hdf5

...
~ computer noises ~
...

2025-06-10 21:18:03,494 | INFO | Ending lockloss monitor. This is either due to having completed the measurement, and this functionality being terminated; or because the whole process was aborted.
2025-06-10 21:18:40,400 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/DARMOLG_SS/DARMOLG_SS_20250610T205533Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 21:18:40,409 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_SS/PCALY2DARM_SS_20250610T205533Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 21:18:40,415 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L1_SS/SUSETMX_L1_SS_20250610T205533Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 21:18:40,420 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L2_SS/SUSETMX_L2_SS_20250610T205533Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 21:18:40,426 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L3_SS/SUSETMX_L3_SS_20250610T205533Z.hdf5
PDT: 2025-06-10 14:18:40.573696 PDT
UTC: 2025-06-10 21:18:40.573696 UTC
GPS: 1433625538.573696

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 ISC
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:59, Tuesday 10 June 2025 - last comment - 13:54, Wednesday 11 June 2025(84939)
Summary of changes to ASC

Here is an executive summary of the ASC changes that have been made, why they were made, and the potential impact on the noise:

I ran a coherence in NLN with all the arm loops, MICH and PRC2 ASC. There is some coherence with CHARD P, and with MICH P and Y that would be worth investigating with a noise budget injection.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 13:54, Wednesday 11 June 2025 (84980)

I just added the DHARD P boost back into the guardian and engaged it on the way up for this lock. No issues.

H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:59, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84938)
Green QPD references maybe change due to TMS pointing?

Sheila pointed out that the green reference resetting that I did yesterday (alog 84902) maybe didn't need to have the green QPD setpoints set, and should just have needed the camera nominal values set. 

This morning I did a bit of trending, although I think there is more to do if someone wants to take that on.  In the attached screenshot (not super readable, since I had to run to a meeting, sorry!) the Y-cursors are set to the values of the various signals just after I reset the green refs yesterday.  Then the data traces that are visible in the plots are from the most recent reference setting before that, before we reseated the HAM1 door. 

The TMS pitch and yaw values are all about 1 urad different between the two times (I seem to have zoomed too much on the TMSY Y plot though).  The green QPDs, particularly the Xarm pit A and then both the Xarm yaws changed. The camera offsets didn't chage much, although they did change a bit.

Anyhow, no major conclusions here, more just posting as a 'project started, someone is welcome to pick it up from here if they want to before I get back to it'.

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:36, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84934)
Jitter cleaning seems okay for now - no changes

I just checked the efficacy of the jitter noise cleaning.  Obviously we'd prefer to mitigate this in hardware, but it still seems useful to check up on.

There are still several vacuum pumps running near HAM1, so hopefully these jitter peaks won't be as prevalent once they get turned off in a few days. However, until then, it looks like the cleaning coefficients from before the vent are still good.  This makes some sense, in that we didn't do a lot that would change our coupling of the jitter noise into the interferometer dramatically. 

For now, I'll leave the noise subtraction as it was before the vent, with no changes.

 

Images attached to this report
H1 CAL
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:17, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84932)
Calibration measurement, BB and simulines

Broadband:

Start: 1433619864 / 2025-06-10 12:44:06

Stop: 1433620174 / 2025-06-10 12:49:16

Simulines:

GPS start: 1433620215.301202

GPS stop: 1433621616.185126

2025-06-10 20:13:18,020 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/DARMOLG_SS/DARMOLG_SS_20250610T194958Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 20:13:18,028 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_SS/PCALY2DARM_SS_20250610T194958Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 20:13:18,035 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L1_SS/SUSETMX_L1_SS_20250610T194958Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 20:13:18,040 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L2_SS/SUSETMX_L2_SS_20250610T194958Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 20:13:18,045 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L3_SS/SUSETMX_L3_SS_20250610T194958Z.hdf5

 

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:13, Tuesday 10 June 2025 - last comment - 08:23, Wednesday 11 June 2025(84930)
Some Observe.snap SDF clearing

I'm working on going through some Observe SDFs, so that we're ready for observing soon.

Jim is currently working on going through many of the SEI SDFs.  The rest of the diffs I need to check with other commissioners to be sure about before we clear them, but I think we're getting close to having our SDFs cleared!

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 14:05, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84935)

h1tcshws sdfs attached.

Reverted BaffePDs to what they were 3 months ago, attached, unsure why they would have changed.

SQZ ADF frequency sdfs accepted, we do not know why these would have been accepted at the values -600 that they've been at some of the past 2 weeks.

Images attached to this comment
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 13:35, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84936)

ASC SDFs were from changes to DC6, cleared.

elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 13:39, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84937)

Cleared these SDFs for the phase changes for LSC REFL A and B.

Images attached to this comment
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 16:14, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84945)

I trended these, and see that FM2 was on in all three of these last time we were in observing, so these must have been erroneously accepted in the observing snap.

Images attached to this comment
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 08:23, Wednesday 11 June 2025 (84965)

I also accepted the HAM7_DK_BYPASS time from 1200 to 999999 after checking with Dave, as attached.

Images attached to this comment
H1 CDS (CDS, SEI)
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:13, Tuesday 10 June 2025 - last comment - 11:59, Tuesday 01 July 2025(84928)
odd cabling on h1brsey
I went down to end Y to retrieve the usb stick that I remotely copied the c:\slowcontrols directory on h1brsey to, and also to try to connect h1brsey to the kvm switch in the rack. I eventually realized that what I thought was a vga port on the back of h1brsey was probably not, and instead I found this odd seeming wiring connected from what I am guessing is a hdmi or dvi port on the back of h1brsey, to some kind of converter device, then to a usb port on a network switch. I'm not sure what this is about, so I am attaching pictures.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 09:41, Thursday 12 June 2025 (84994)
A work permit has been filed to remove this cabling and put h1brsey on the kvm switch in the rack.
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 11:59, Tuesday 01 July 2025 (85466)
This has been completed.
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:49, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84927)
Tue CP1 Fill

Tue Jun 10 10:12:01 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 11min 57secs

 

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:34, Tuesday 10 June 2025 - last comment - 16:59, Wednesday 25 June 2025(84922)
Noticed BS PIT Moved while locking and then drifts in NLN: not new, happened end of O3b but not 1 year ago.

Sheila, Elenna, Camilla

Sheila was questioning if something is drifting for us to need an initial alignment after the majority of relocks. Elenna and I noticed that BS PIT moves a lot both while powering up /moving spots and while in NLN. Unsure from the BS alignment inputs plot what's causing this.

This was also happening before the break (see below) but the operators were similarly needing more regular initial alignments before the break too.  1 year ago this was not happening, plot.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 12:44, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84929)

These large BS PIT changes began 5th to 6th July 2024 (plot). This is the day shift from the time that the first lock like this happened 5th July 2024 19:26UTC (12:26PT): 78877 at the time we were doing PR2 spot moves. There also was a SUS computer restart 78892 but that appeared to be a day after this started happening.

Images attached to this comment
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 09:45, Wednesday 11 June 2025 (84966)ISC, SUS

Sheila, Camilla

This reminded Sheila of when we were heating a SUS in the past and causing the bottom mass to pitch and the ASC to move the top mass to counteract this. Then after lockloss, the bottom mass would slowly go back to it's nominal position.

We do see this on the BS since the PR2 move, see attached (top 2 left plots). See in the green bottom mass oplev trace, when the ASC is turned off on lockloss, the BS moves quickly and then slowly moves again over the next ~30 minutes, do not see simular things on PR3. Attached is the same plot before the PR2 move. And below is a list of other PR2 positions we tried, all the other positions have also made this BS drift. The total PR2 move since the good place is ~3500urad in Yaw.

  • Different time May 21st to 24th 2024:
    • BS Oplev Drift
    • Plot shows 30urad M1 drift
    • PR2 Alignment Sliders P: 1435, Y: 1130
  • Pre July 5th 2024:
    • No BS Oplev Drift
    • Plot shows 5urad M1 drift
    • PR2 Alignment Sliders P: 1565, Y: 3210
  • July 5th 2024 to 6th Feb 2025:
    • BS Oplev Drift
    • Plot shows 50urad M1 drift
    • PR2 Alignment Sliders P: 1535, Y: 2785
  • 6th Feb 2025 to 10th Feb 2025:
    • BS Oplev Drift
    • Plot shows 30urad M1 drift
    • PR2 Alignment Sliders P: 1480, Y: 1195
  • 10th Feb 2025 to now:
    • BS Oplev Drift
    • Plot shows 30-40urad M1 drift
    • PR2 Alignment Sliders P: 1430, Y: -245

To avoid this heating and BS drift, we should move back towards a PR2 YAW of closer to 3200. But, we moved PR2 to avoid the spot clipping on the scrapper baffle, e.g.  77631, 80319, 82722, 82641.

Images attached to this comment
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 14:38, Thursday 12 June 2025 (85002)

I did a bit of alog archaeology to re-remember what we'd done in the past.

  • In August of 2015, we found that we were struggling with PR3 pitch alignment jumping, then cooling down upon lockloss.  Alog 20268 talks about the implementation of the lock loss compensation, which first appeared in ISC_DRMI guardian in rev 11228.
  • At some point (I didn't dig to find out when precisely), we also implemented the same filters for BS pitch.
  • By Jan 2020, both BS and PRM had the soft ASC turn-off.
  • In Jan 2020, ISC_DRMI rev 20905 we removed this soft ASC turn-off for both PR3 and BS.  The referenced alog 54709 notes that we shouldn't need those anymore, since we had installed wire heating baffles, to prevent the wires from being illuminated and heating up.
  • We haven't had the soft turn-off filters in use since 2020, about 3 months before the end of O3b.  This may be why Camilla saw that we were seeing BS drift at the end of O3b.
  • Perhaps our alignment during O4, until we moved the PR spots in May 2024, was such that we weren't susceptible to this wire heating.
  • I don't think PR3 is seeing the same kind of trouble that it did back in 2015 upon lockloss, so I think its wire heating baffles are working as designed, so no need to make any changes to the PR3 controls.
  • Sheila made the point that because we unclipped some of the +Y side of the beam (without moving the spot on the BS), maybe there is a bit more light that is illuminating the barrel of the BS or getting to the wires.  Or, something?  Without having looked at the actual drawings, I could imagine that the wire heating baffles are working better on PR3 than they are on the BS, because we hit PR3 much closer to normal incidence, whereas with the BS the light could be sneaking around the baffles.  Robert thinks that light could get inside the cage baffle and reflect around and be hitting and heating the wires.
  • All of this seems to say that we should re-implement the soft ASC turn-off for the BS. I had a quick look at the 1/e time for the BS to move after lockloss (it's about 241 seconds), and the 1/e time for the filters (about 240 seconds, despite my quoting in alog 54706 that they were 25 min filters (2*pis are hard!)

To put back the soft turn-off of the BS ASC, I think we need to:

  • Disable the BS M1 ASC lockloss trigger.  Jeff reminded me that this would foil my plans, since it turns off the ASC signals to the EUL2OSEM matrix.  This will mean that neither the Pit nor the Yaw BS M1 signals will be shut off by the lockloss trigger.  To disable, we'll need to set H1:SUS-BS_M1_TRIG_ASC_ENABLE to zero (which means that the ASC signals will always be passed to the EUL2OSEM matrix).  I don't think this is in guardian anywhere, so we should only need to change it and then accept in safe and observe snap files.
  • Change ISC_DRMI around line 66 such that BS pit gain is not set to zero.  Also, have it turn off FM1 in addition to turning off the input.
  • Change ISC_DRMI around line 141 to not hit the BS pit RSET button.

Camilla made the good point that we probably don't want to implement this and then have the first trial of it be overnight.  Maybe I'll put it in sometime Monday (when we again have commissioning time), and if we lose lock we can check that it did all the right things.

jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 09:57, Monday 16 June 2025 (85075)

I've now implemented this soft let-go of BS pit in the ISC_DRMI guardian, and loaded.  We'll be able to watch it throughout the day today, including while we're commissioning, so hopefully we'll be able to see it work properly at least once (eg, from a DRMI lockloss).

jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 17:16, Monday 16 June 2025 (85106)

This 'slow let-go' mode for BS pitch certainly makes the behavior of the BS pit oplev qualitatively different. 

In the attached plots, the sharp spike up and decay down behavior around -8 hours is how it had been looking for a long time (as Camilla notes in previous logs in this thread).  Around -2 hours we lost lock from NomLowNoise, and while we do get a glitch upon lockloss, the BS doesn't seem to move quite as much, and is mostly flattened out after a shorter amount of time.  I also note that this time (-2 hours ago) we didn't need to do an initial alignment (which was done at the -8 hours ago time).  However, as Jeff pointed out, we held at DOWN for a while to reconcile SDFs, it's not quite a fair comparison. 

We'll see how things go, but there's at least a chance that this will help reduce the need for initial alignments.  If needed, we can try to tweak the time constant of the 'soft let-go' to further make the optical lever signal stay more overall flat.

The SUSBS SDF safe.snap file is saved with FM1 off, so that it won't get turned back on in SDF revert.  The PREP_PRMI_ASC and PREP_DRMI_ASC states both re-enable FM1 - I may need to go through and ensure it's on for MICH initial alignment.

Images attached to this comment
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 16:59, Wednesday 25 June 2025 (85344)

RyanS, Jenne

We've looked at a couple of times that the BS has been let go of slowly, and it seems like the cooldown time is usually about 17 minutes until it's basically done and at where it wants to be for the next acquisition of DRMI.  Attached is one such example.

Alternatively, a day or so ago Tony had to do an initial alignment.  On that day, it seemed like the BS took much longer to get to its quiescent spot.  I'm not yet sure why the behavior is different sometimes.

Tony is working on taking a look at our average reacquisition time, which will help tell us whether we should make another change to further improve the time it takes to get the BS to where it wants to be for acquisition.

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:42, Tuesday 10 June 2025 - last comment - 12:36, Wednesday 11 June 2025(84914)
Tuesday Ops Day Shift - A Light Maintenance Day.


TITLE: 06/10 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 4mph Gusts, 1mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.18 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
H1 was in IDLE when I arrived.
I will start trying to lock now.
 

Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 12:41, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84931)SUS

I've changed the sign of the damping gain for ITMX 13 in lscparams from +0.2 to -0.2 after seeing it damp correctly in 2 lock stretches. The VIOLIN_DAMPING GRD could use a reload to see this change.

rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - 12:36, Wednesday 11 June 2025 (84979)

I have loaded the violin damping guardian, since the setting RyanC found still works.

H1 CAL
matthewrichard.todd@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:45, Thursday 23 January 2025 - last comment - 13:05, Tuesday 10 June 2025(82430)
recipe for reverting new anti-aliasing filters w/o lockloss

[Jenne Louis Matt]

The change in the filters used by calibration created a 10% calibration error. Louis is trying to fix this but in an effort to have a way to revert to the previous filters without losing lock Jenne came up with a cdsutils way to revert back. Essentially it toggles off the new filters ('H1:OMC-DCPD_A0 FM10 H1:OMC-DCPD_B0') FM10 and steps the demod phase ('H1:OMC-LSC_PHASEROT') in steps of 1 degree, 77 times, with a 0.065 sec delay (77steps/5seconds) between each step. The filter toggles have a 5 second ramp time, which informs the step delay in the cdsutils step, and the 77 degrees is the difference from the old demod phase and the new. Hopefully this avoids a lockloss in the event we are to revert, but may not. *fingers crossed*

Here is the command:

cdsutils switch H1:OMC-DCPD_A0 FM10 OFF; cdsutils switch H1:OMC-DCPD_B0 FM10 OFF; cdsutils step H1:OMC-LSC_PHASEROT 1,77 -s 0.065

UPDATE:

It worked :) anti-alias filters off and OMC-LSC phaserot returned to nominal

Comments related to this report
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - 13:05, Tuesday 10 June 2025 (84933)

Joe, Fancisco and I got confused about the reverting and changing of the OMC Phase rot changes around this time.
I opened up an ndscope to see what happened.
 

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 601-620 of 83104.Go to page Start 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 End