TITLE: 06/10 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Commissioning
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Tony
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 16mph Gusts, 13mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.18 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
We are Locked and just finished another set of calibration measurements
Following instructions from 76751 I ran a CARM OLG measurement after we had been at high power for a bit more than 4 hours, see attached. The most recent comparison I can find for low noise is 80956, it looks like we would want to increase the gain by roughly 6dB to get back to a 17 kHz ugf as seen there.
Randy, Ibrahim
Today, Randy an I fit checked the BBSS Structure Support Plate (D2500013) and the Lifting Bar Assembly (D1100802) for the BBSS.
Overall, everything fit. See pictures below. Some relevant notes:
No SQZ time taken today, 21:47:00UTC to 21:59:00UTC.
2 Seconds of data in this data span is missing.
Our tools can't pull the entire time for this No SQZ ing time.
Johnathan has given us the 2 seconds that are missing from the data 12 minute data stretch.
"I don't have good news for you. There is a 2s gap in there at 1433627912-1433627913 on H-H1_llhoft. The H-H1_HOFT_C00 is worse, I don't see frames in the 1433627.... range at all." ~ Johnathan H.
We were able to salvage 674 seconds from this time that can be useful.
Useful GPS time: 1433627238 -1433627912
At the beginning of the vent in early April all the CDS WAPs were turned on and left on. The CDS SDF was updated to that configuration.
Today all but the MSR WAPs were power off, and we have returned to the O4 SDF configuration for these channels.
running calibration sweep #2
pydarm measure --run-headless bb
2025-06-10 13:47:53,831 config file: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/ifo/pydarm_cmd_H1.yaml
2025-06-10 13:47:53,846 available measurements:
...
~ computer noises ~
...
notification: end of test
diag> save /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_BB/PCALY2DARM_BB_20250610T204753Z.xml
/ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_BB/PCALY2DARM_BB_20250610T204753Z.xml saved
diag> quit
EXIT KERNEL
2025-06-10 13:53:04,389 bb measurement complete.
2025-06-10 13:53:04,389 bb output: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_BB/PCALY2DARM_BB_20250610T204753Z.xml
2025-06-10 13:53:04,389 all measurements complete.
anthony.sanchez@cdsws29: gpstime;python /ligo/groups/cal/src/simulines/simulines/simuLines.py -i /ligo/groups/cal/H1/simulines_settings/newDARM_20231221/settings_h1_20250212.ini;gpstime
PDT: 2025-06-10 13:55:32.403757 PDT
UTC: 2025-06-10 20:55:32.403757 UTC
GPS: 1433624150.403757
2025-06-10 20:55:33,268 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/DARMOLG_SS/DARMOLG_SS_20250610T205533Z.hdf5
...
~ computer noises ~
...
2025-06-10 21:18:03,494 | INFO | Ending lockloss monitor. This is either due to having completed the measurement, and this functionality being terminated; or because the whole process was aborted.
2025-06-10 21:18:40,400 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/DARMOLG_SS/DARMOLG_SS_20250610T205533Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 21:18:40,409 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_SS/PCALY2DARM_SS_20250610T205533Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 21:18:40,415 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L1_SS/SUSETMX_L1_SS_20250610T205533Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 21:18:40,420 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L2_SS/SUSETMX_L2_SS_20250610T205533Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 21:18:40,426 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L3_SS/SUSETMX_L3_SS_20250610T205533Z.hdf5
PDT: 2025-06-10 14:18:40.573696 PDT
UTC: 2025-06-10 21:18:40.573696 UTC
GPS: 1433625538.573696
Here is an executive summary of the ASC changes that have been made, why they were made, and the potential impact on the noise:
I ran a coherence in NLN with all the arm loops, MICH and PRC2 ASC. There is some coherence with CHARD P, and with MICH P and Y that would be worth investigating with a noise budget injection.
I just added the DHARD P boost back into the guardian and engaged it on the way up for this lock. No issues.
Sheila pointed out that the green reference resetting that I did yesterday (alog 84902) maybe didn't need to have the green QPD setpoints set, and should just have needed the camera nominal values set.
This morning I did a bit of trending, although I think there is more to do if someone wants to take that on. In the attached screenshot (not super readable, since I had to run to a meeting, sorry!) the Y-cursors are set to the values of the various signals just after I reset the green refs yesterday. Then the data traces that are visible in the plots are from the most recent reference setting before that, before we reseated the HAM1 door.
The TMS pitch and yaw values are all about 1 urad different between the two times (I seem to have zoomed too much on the TMSY Y plot though). The green QPDs, particularly the Xarm pit A and then both the Xarm yaws changed. The camera offsets didn't chage much, although they did change a bit.
Anyhow, no major conclusions here, more just posting as a 'project started, someone is welcome to pick it up from here if they want to before I get back to it'.
I just checked the efficacy of the jitter noise cleaning. Obviously we'd prefer to mitigate this in hardware, but it still seems useful to check up on.
There are still several vacuum pumps running near HAM1, so hopefully these jitter peaks won't be as prevalent once they get turned off in a few days. However, until then, it looks like the cleaning coefficients from before the vent are still good. This makes some sense, in that we didn't do a lot that would change our coupling of the jitter noise into the interferometer dramatically.
For now, I'll leave the noise subtraction as it was before the vent, with no changes.
Broadband:
Start: 1433619864 / 2025-06-10 12:44:06
Stop: 1433620174 / 2025-06-10 12:49:16
Simulines:
GPS start: 1433620215.301202
GPS stop: 1433621616.185126
2025-06-10 20:13:18,020 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/DARMOLG_SS/DARMOLG_SS_20250610T194958Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 20:13:18,028 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_SS/PCALY2DARM_SS_20250610T194958Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 20:13:18,035 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L1_SS/SUSETMX_L1_SS_20250610T194958Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 20:13:18,040 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L2_SS/SUSETMX_L2_SS_20250610T194958Z.hdf5
2025-06-10 20:13:18,045 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L3_SS/SUSETMX_L3_SS_20250610T194958Z.hdf5
I'm working on going through some Observe SDFs, so that we're ready for observing soon.
Jim is currently working on going through many of the SEI SDFs. The rest of the diffs I need to check with other commissioners to be sure about before we clear them, but I think we're getting close to having our SDFs cleared!
h1tcshws sdfs attached.
Reverted BaffePDs to what they were 3 months ago, attached, unsure why they would have changed.
SQZ ADF frequency sdfs accepted, we do not know why these would have been accepted at the values -600 that they've been at some of the past 2 weeks.
ASC SDFs were from changes to DC6, cleared.
Cleared these SDFs for the phase changes for LSC REFL A and B.
I trended these, and see that FM2 was on in all three of these last time we were in observing, so these must have been erroneously accepted in the observing snap.
I also accepted the HAM7_DK_BYPASS time from 1200 to 999999 after checking with Dave, as attached.
I went down to end Y to retrieve the usb stick that I remotely copied the c:\slowcontrols directory on h1brsey to, and also to try to connect h1brsey to the kvm switch in the rack. I eventually realized that what I thought was a vga port on the back of h1brsey was probably not, and instead I found this odd seeming wiring connected from what I am guessing is a hdmi or dvi port on the back of h1brsey, to some kind of converter device, then to a usb port on a network switch. I'm not sure what this is about, so I am attaching pictures.
Tue Jun 10 10:12:01 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 11min 57secs
Sheila, Elenna, Camilla
Sheila was questioning if something is drifting for us to need an initial alignment after the majority of relocks. Elenna and I noticed that BS PIT moves a lot both while powering up /moving spots and while in NLN. Unsure from the BS alignment inputs plot what's causing this.
This was also happening before the break (see below) but the operators were similarly needing more regular initial alignments before the break too. 1 year ago this was not happening, plot.
These large BS PIT changes began 5th to 6th July 2024 (plot). This is the day shift from the time that the first lock like this happened 5th July 2024 19:26UTC (12:26PT): 78877 at the time we were doing PR2 spot moves. There also was a SUS computer restart 78892 but that appeared to be a day after this started happening.
Sheila, Camilla
This reminded Sheila of when we were heating a SUS in the past and causing the bottom mass to pitch and the ASC to move the top mass to counteract this. Then after lockloss, the bottom mass would slowly go back to it's nominal position.
We do see this on the BS since the PR2 move, see attached (top 2 left plots). See in the green bottom mass oplev trace, when the ASC is turned off on lockloss, the BS moves quickly and then slowly moves again over the next ~30 minutes, do not see simular things on PR3. Attached is the same plot before the PR2 move. And below is a list of other PR2 positions we tried, all the other positions have also made this BS drift. The total PR2 move since the good place is ~3500urad in Yaw.
To avoid this heating and BS drift, we should move back towards a PR2 YAW of closer to 3200. But, we moved PR2 to avoid the spot clipping on the scrapper baffle, e.g. 77631, 80319, 82722, 82641.
I did a bit of alog archaeology to re-remember what we'd done in the past.
To put back the soft turn-off of the BS ASC, I think we need to:
Camilla made the good point that we probably don't want to implement this and then have the first trial of it be overnight. Maybe I'll put it in sometime Monday (when we again have commissioning time), and if we lose lock we can check that it did all the right things.
I've now implemented this soft let-go of BS pit in the ISC_DRMI guardian, and loaded. We'll be able to watch it throughout the day today, including while we're commissioning, so hopefully we'll be able to see it work properly at least once (eg, from a DRMI lockloss).
This 'slow let-go' mode for BS pitch certainly makes the behavior of the BS pit oplev qualitatively different.
In the attached plots, the sharp spike up and decay down behavior around -8 hours is how it had been looking for a long time (as Camilla notes in previous logs in this thread). Around -2 hours we lost lock from NomLowNoise, and while we do get a glitch upon lockloss, the BS doesn't seem to move quite as much, and is mostly flattened out after a shorter amount of time. I also note that this time (-2 hours ago) we didn't need to do an initial alignment (which was done at the -8 hours ago time). However, as Jeff pointed out, we held at DOWN for a while to reconcile SDFs, it's not quite a fair comparison.
We'll see how things go, but there's at least a chance that this will help reduce the need for initial alignments. If needed, we can try to tweak the time constant of the 'soft let-go' to further make the optical lever signal stay more overall flat.
The SUSBS SDF safe.snap file is saved with FM1 off, so that it won't get turned back on in SDF revert. The PREP_PRMI_ASC and PREP_DRMI_ASC states both re-enable FM1 - I may need to go through and ensure it's on for MICH initial alignment.
RyanS, Jenne
We've looked at a couple of times that the BS has been let go of slowly, and it seems like the cooldown time is usually about 17 minutes until it's basically done and at where it wants to be for the next acquisition of DRMI. Attached is one such example.
Alternatively, a day or so ago Tony had to do an initial alignment. On that day, it seemed like the BS took much longer to get to its quiescent spot. I'm not yet sure why the behavior is different sometimes.
Tony is working on taking a look at our average reacquisition time, which will help tell us whether we should make another change to further improve the time it takes to get the BS to where it wants to be for acquisition.
TITLE: 06/10 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 4mph Gusts, 1mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.18 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
H1 was in IDLE when I arrived.
I will start trying to lock now.
I've changed the sign of the damping gain for ITMX 13 in lscparams from +0.2 to -0.2 after seeing it damp correctly in 2 lock stretches. The VIOLIN_DAMPING GRD could use a reload to see this change.
I have loaded the violin damping guardian, since the setting RyanC found still works.
[Jenne Louis Matt]
The change in the filters used by calibration created a 10% calibration error. Louis is trying to fix this but in an effort to have a way to revert to the previous filters without losing lock Jenne came up with a cdsutils way to revert back. Essentially it toggles off the new filters ('H1:OMC-DCPD_A0 FM10 H1:OMC-DCPD_B0') FM10
and steps the demod phase ('H1:OMC-LSC_PHASEROT')
in steps of 1 degree, 77 times, with a 0.065 sec delay (77steps/5seconds) between each step. The filter toggles have a 5 second ramp time, which informs the step delay in the cdsutils step, and the 77 degrees is the difference from the old demod phase and the new. Hopefully this avoids a lockloss in the event we are to revert, but may not. *fingers crossed*
Here is the command:
cdsutils switch H1:OMC-DCPD_A0 FM10 OFF; cdsutils switch H1:OMC-DCPD_B0 FM10 OFF; cdsutils step H1:OMC-LSC_PHASEROT 1,77 -s 0.065
UPDATE:
It worked :) anti-alias filters off and OMC-LSC phaserot returned to nominal
Joe, Fancisco and I got confused about the reverting and changing of the OMC Phase rot changes around this time.
I opened up an ndscope to see what happened.