Displaying reports 82621-82640 of 86328.Go to page Start 4128 4129 4130 4131 4132 4133 4134 4135 4136 End
Reports until 16:38, Friday 10 August 2012
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:38, Friday 10 August 2012 - last comment - 17:49, Friday 10 August 2012(3813)
PR2-04 suffers broken magnet in suspension, chamber-side

After finishing assessing and adjusting the roll and pitch of the suspensed PR2 optic, we started adjusting the 14 OSEM positions.  During the coarse of this, we broke a magnet off of the PR2 optic.  Mark Barton and Travis are looking into regluing it onto the optic within the suspension, in an effort to retain some sort of schedule for next week while our team is stretched over to LLO.  Lesson learned is that the EQ stops need to be set very close while adjustments are being made.  I thought this was the case when we were working on it, but clearly not close enough.  It's unfortunate that the top BOSEM adjustment tools and your hand are very close to the suspension wire making knocking the suspended masses around easy.

Comments related to this report
mark.barton@LIGO.ORG - 17:49, Friday 10 August 2012 (3816)
Mark Barton and Travis Sadecki

We did a repair as follows:

1. We set up a jig using parts from the AOSEM tester, including two translation stages, some posts, and a holder intended for a 10x10 magnet (see attached photo).

2. We cleaned up the magnet-standoff assembly and adhered it magnetically to the steel disk of the magnet holder.

3. We aligned the new standoff with the glue ring on the optic from the original standoff using the translation stages.

4. We backed off the standoff and removed the glue ring with a razor blade and an acetone swab.

5. We applied glue to the standoff and brought it in to touch the optic. 

The glue will be left to set over the weekend and then the magnet holder should be able to be backed away - the magnetic attraction is not very strong.

Images attached to this comment
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:37, Friday 10 August 2012 (3812)
WHAM3 Optical Table Payload Secure
Mitchell, Jim & Hugh
The first layer of the additional payload mass (D0901075) on the West side of HAM (90kg) has been bolted down to the table; we did this Thursday.  There is still 210kg to go.
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:31, Friday 10 August 2012 (3811)
WHAM5 ISI Installation Readiness
Remain to Do:
At ISI: Complete Cable SN Inventory, Replace Act Windows, Confirm Cable security for flight.

At HAM5: Loosen Door Bolts, Clean around Doors, Remove Doors, Remove Top Conflat, Remove Legs from A-Frames, Position A-Frames at Chamber, Install I-Beams, Position I-Beams per Procedure, Position Cart under Beams, Fly ISI, etc...

Thanks to Christina, Karen, Cris, MarkD, ScottL, DevilEd, Jim, Mitchell, Greg, & Eric
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:11, Friday 10 August 2012 (3810)
Vented Vertex Volume
Prior to venting, I sprayed helium around the welds which join the thin-wall MC tube to the thick flanges.  The LD background was 3.5 x 10-9 torr*L/sec -> no responses.  I did not spray all of the welds on the MC nozzles, roll seams or roll butt joints, however.  

Also, PT120A wasn't working today.  I think that I had drug my fall protection tether across the gauge pair the other day during leak testing and must have interrupted the cable connection.  I eventually had to remove and re-installed its cable to get it going which fixed it.  
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:57, Friday 10 August 2012 (3808)
ops afternoon summary
Cheryl moving TCS lasers into HAM 6 bay
Kyle soft closed GV-5, venting vertex for ISI install into HAM5
X1 SEI
james.batch@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:28, Friday 10 August 2012 (3809)
Restarted models on SEI test stand
Restarted models on the sei test stand (stormy), cpu for the iop was pegged.
H2 AOS
thomas.vo@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:37, Friday 10 August 2012 (3807)
H2 ITMY/ETMY Optical Levers Re-Alignment
The H2 ITMY and ETMY have been re-centered with the cavity beam locked at approximately 10:05 for ITMY and 10:55 for ETMY.  The cavity was locked at the time.

One particular note, all of the electronics for the ETMY optical levers (laser, whitening chassis, power supply) were running off a power strip that was disconnected sometime in the past few days and this caused a loss in signal.  Please don't do this.
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:36, Friday 10 August 2012 (3799)
Morning Ops Summary

Morning (8-noon) Notes

OAT Work:  Aiden & crew had the reins for Ring Heater work

Craning activity:  HAM5 ISI had it's Container top removed and the ISI is staged in a cleanroom

H2 ITM/BS CPU Meter went to a MINOR alarm state (value = 13) at 8:27am

Thomas centering oplevs for ITMy & ETMy

Mark Dodson making measurements around BSC8 10-10:15

Kyle is inquiring about venting section of HAM5.

Patrick is covering the afternoon.

H1 TCS
aidan.brooks@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:35, Friday 10 August 2012 - last comment - 11:35, Friday 10 August 2012(3787)
Ring heater and HWS measurements

I turned on the Ring Heater this morning to a nominal 30W of electrical power. We've yet to fully determine the ratio of the radiated power to electrical power, but the most recent number is approximately 2.5W radiated power per 6W electrical power.

I measured the spherical power of the HWS beam -  probing the ETM thermal lens and surface deformation and compared it to the results from a simple COMSOL model of the predicted thermal lens + surface deformation [no fitting]. The results are shown in the attached plot. Bear in mind that the scale of the predicted model will be affected by the delivered power (dependent on the radiated to electrical power ratio) and that the HWS is still operating on a nominal calibration for the optical system - rather than a measured calibration. 

The results are quite similar but there are obvious differences in the time constant. At the moment I would put that down to the simplicity of the COMSOL model - it doesn't include the flats on the sides of the ETM, or the reaction mass or the time constant associated with the ring heater itself.

However, this is the first real aLIGO measurement of thermal lensing with the HWS.

Caution: this is not solely the surface curvature of the ETM - the optical path distortion from the thermal lens is roughly 10x larger than that of the surface curvature.

10-Aug-2012 11:34AM - replaced plot. I had added the incorrect sign to the surface deformation in the model. I've fixed this.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
aidan.brooks@LIGO.ORG - 11:32, Friday 10 August 2012 (3806)

Extra information: 

Ring Heater on at 1028555836

 

Requested current: H2:TCS-ETMY_RING_HTR_SEG1_DC_I_SET_OUTPUT

 

Measured current: H2:TCS-ETMY_RING_HTR_SEG1_I_MON_OUTPUT

Measured voltage: H2:TCS-ETMY_RING_HTR_SEG1_V_MON_OUTPUT

 

Ring Heater Settings
  Requested current Measured current Measured V across RH Electrical power (V*I)
Upper RH segment  630mA  623.4mA  21.485V  13.394W
Lower RH segment  630mA  623.0mA  21.458V  13.368W


HWS Channels:

Defocus @ HWS: H2:TCS-ETMY_HWS_POLYFIT_SPHERICAL_POWER [m^-1]

Defocus @ ETM: (1/mag^2)*H2:TCS-ETMY_HWS_POLYFIT_SPHERICAL_POWER [m^-1]

H2 DAQ
james.batch@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:52, Friday 10 August 2012 (3802)
Both h2nds0 and h2nds1 malfunctioned
The daqd process on h2nds0 died, the log file shows 
...
Ask for retransmission of 6 packets; port 7097 (repeated 50 times)
Have to skip 6 packets (retry limit exceeded)



Didn't automatically restart because /var/run/daqd.pid didn't get erased.
I manually restarted the process.

The computer h2nds1 was completely unresponsive.  No error message appeared on the console.  Restarted computer.

With both nds servers down, it was impossible to get channel data for any software that needed it.

Suggest more reliable method of determining if daqd is actually running, along with some bug fixing.
H2 TCS
jaclyn.sanders@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:09, Friday 10 August 2012 - last comment - 10:04, Friday 10 August 2012(3800)
Cavity transfer functions running for ring heater test (Jax, Aidan, Elli)

I'm running repeated cavity transfer functions to monitor changes in the cavity during the ring heater test. This means that Excitation B on Common Mode Board A will be left on for the duration of the test (~12 h), and that the GPIB unit on the SR785 at EY is in use and should not be contacted.

Comments related to this report
jaclyn.sanders@LIGO.ORG - 10:04, Friday 10 August 2012 (3803)

Suspending this while oplev calibrations and suspension tests are going on. Will comment when I need to turn Excitation B on CMA on again.

Logbook Admin Feature Requests
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:32, Friday 10 August 2012 - last comment - 12:39, Tuesday 14 August 2012(3798)
Please add .py to acceptable file additions
Thomas tried to add a python script (with extension .py) to his LHO aLOG 3758, but was thwarted and needed to change the extension to .txt in order upload it. Please add this to the acceptable files.
Comments related to this report
jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - 11:14, Friday 10 August 2012 (3805)

I don't see why the log book should be rejecting any attachments based on extension at all.  That doesn't make any sense.  One should be able to attach anything they think is relevant to a report, regardless of file type.  File name extensions aren't a particularly good way to determine a file type anyway.

dwayne.giardina@LIGO.ORG - 12:38, Tuesday 14 August 2012 (3841)
I have added .py to LLO's logbook.

This OSL software that we are using requires defining allowable attachment extensions and associating them with a not null mime type.  I didn't write the code, or participate in the process that determined which software would be used.  
jonathan.hanks@LIGO.ORG - 12:39, Tuesday 14 August 2012 (3842)
Added at LHO as well.
H2 SUS
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 06:31, Friday 10 August 2012 - last comment - 08:29, Friday 10 August 2012(3795)
Restored ITMY Oplev Calibration on ITMY
Checking to see if anyone had centered the optical levers in hopes to grab a spectra of the Commissioning Team's awesome new spectra, I found that 
- ETMY was still not centered, but with the corrected calibration
- ITMY was centered, but had the old calibration
(queue sad trombone).

I've restored the ITMY calibration that I installed yesterday morning.

I see that H2SUSITMY and H2SUSETMY were rebooted some time later in the day yesterday, according to the ops log, but I don't see any further details/aLOGs as to why...
My guess is that safe.snap had not been updated since those calibrations were installed (though the right calibration stuck for ETMY...). 

I haven't gathered a new safe.snap myself, I'll will wait for local staff, as I'm not sure about the state of the cavity. But, when you do, remember there's a nifty script here:
${userapps}/release/cds/common/scripts/makeSafeBackup
which can use to make a new safe.snap in the appropriate reboot location, and it also makes a copy in the appropriate userapps directory (with the model name appended), e.g. 

0$ cd /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cds/common/scripts/
0$ ./makeSafeBackup sus h2susitmy
0$ 

which puts files in
/opt/rtcds/lho/h2/target/h2susitmy/h2susitmyepics/burt/safe.snap
and
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h2/burtfiles/h2susitmy_safe.snap

Comments related to this report
bram.slagmolen@LIGO.ORG - 07:58, Friday 10 August 2012 (3796)

ha, that makes sense as the ETM oplev did give me any indicaiton I was yawing the test mass. In the early hour of the cavity locking I was trying to compensate for the pointing error casued by the heated ETM. Aiden mention that is was more in yaw (~25 urad), but the oplev wasn't able to show me my moves.

jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 08:29, Friday 10 August 2012 (3797)
Now there are SUM indicators next to the QPD quadrant definitions, under the OPLEVINF button, in the lower left corner, on the SUS_CUST_L3_OPLEV.adl screens (which are linked off pf the QUAD OVERVIEW Screens). I attach screen shots of ETMY (Spot OFF the QPD) and ITMY (Spot ON the QPD). That bar is actually a live reading of the SUM channel, ${IFO}:SUS-${OPTIC}_L3_OPLEV_SUM_OUTMON, with limits from 0 to 10000 cts. (As shown, ITMY is aligned and has ~18k counts worth of light -- so a full green bar, and ETMY is not aligned, and has ~6 cts -- so no green bar).

These is a good indication of whether you have light on the QPD or not.
Images attached to this comment
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:17, Thursday 09 August 2012 (3794)
PR2-04 installed in suspension, chamber-side

Today, we finally stuffed the optic in the PR2 suspension and started correcting it's roll.  We will finish suspending it tomorrow.  As well, Filiberto and Travis sorted out a cable issue on the PR2 chamberside testing setup.  Since, for the moment, we cannot test both MC2 and PR2 simulatenously, and PR2 is our higher priority, we have "given" the shared cable between them to PR2 in hopes of getting it's full data set run over the next 4 business days.  Seek Filiberto if for some reason you need it moved back to MC2 (possibly to facilitate it's testing later next week).

X1 SEI
hugo.paris@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:08, Thursday 09 August 2012 - last comment - 09:37, Friday 10 August 2012(3786)
HAM-ISI Unit #7 - Assembly Validation Progress

CoreyG ,HugoP

Transfer functions ran overnight yesterday. Unwanted resonances are present in the vicinity of 130Hz, on all DOF. The usual suspect is then the 600lbs payload mass set on top of the ISI. One can hear it resonating when being hit. The washers it was sat on were too close from each other. Corey and I lifted this top mass with a fork lift and reset the washers. The mass would vibrate way less when being hit afterwards.

Transfer functions are running overnight.

Comments related to this report
hugo.paris@LIGO.ORG - 09:37, Friday 10 August 2012 (3801)

Moving the washers had the intended effect. It suppressed the unwanted resonances. 

Before/After plots are attached

Non-image files attached to this comment
Displaying reports 82621-82640 of 86328.Go to page Start 4128 4129 4130 4131 4132 4133 4134 4135 4136 End