Displaying reports 81-100 of 84437.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End
Reports until 13:27, Wednesday 10 September 2025
H1 TCS
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:27, Wednesday 10 September 2025 (86830)
TCS System back after Power Outage

Remotely turned on the TCS X and Y chillers.

In the Mechanical Room Mezzanine, pressed the "Output" button on the power supplies labeled "TCS X" and "TCS Y"
In the LVEA, keyed off then on and pressed the "Gate" button on both CO2X and CO2Y chassis, this turned both lasers on.
On their "power control" medms clicked "search fo home" and once that was finished, "go to minium power".
Took the CO2_ITMX/Y__CO2_PWR guardians to NO_OUTPUT. Both CO2s locked on their own.

I restarted the ETMX and ETMY HWS code, following TCS wiki. ITMs were already running. ITM lasers turned back on by themselves.

H1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:46, Wednesday 10 September 2025 - last comment - 15:19, Wednesday 10 September 2025(86829)
Connecting to h1hpipumpctrll0 after power outage

I had some difficulty connecting to the corner hepi pump controller after the power outage. The workstations have gotten too far ahead of the old Athena controller, so when I attempted to ssh to the pump station, I got:

Unable to negotiate with XX.XXX.X.XX port 22: no matching key exchange method found. Their offer: diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha1,diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1

I had to add some options to ssh:

ssh -oKexAlgorithms=+diffie-hellman-group1-sha1 -oHostKeyAlgorithms=+ssh-dss controls@h1hpipumpctrll0

After deleting the old host key again I was able to connect.

Comments related to this report
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 15:19, Wednesday 10 September 2025 (86837)

The end stations were easier with their beckhoff controllers. EX wouldn't start pumping at first, but I think the vfd just needed powered off more completely. I turned it off for 5 secs when I  first arrived, that apparently wasn't enough to reset the vfd. Fil turned it off for maybe 20 secs, and fans came on when he powered it back up, which I didn't hear when I power cycled it earlier. EY came right back up.

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:24, Wednesday 10 September 2025 - last comment - 07:51, Friday 12 September 2025(86827)
H1 is down due to power outage.

We had a site wide power outage around 12:11 local time. Recovery of CDS has started.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 12:40, Wednesday 10 September 2025 (86828)

I've turned the alarms system off, it was producing too much noise.

We are recovering front end models.

david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 13:51, Wednesday 10 September 2025 (86831)

Jonathan, Erik, Richard, Fil, Patrick, EJ, TJ, RyanS, Dave:

CDS is recovered. CDSSDF showing WAPs are on, FMCSSTAT showing LVEA temp change.

Images attached to this comment
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 13:52, Wednesday 10 September 2025 (86832)

Alarms are back on (currently no active alarms). I had to restart the locklossalert.service, it had gotten stuck.

richard.mccarthy@LIGO.ORG - 07:51, Friday 12 September 2025 (86872)

BPA Dispatcher on duty said they had a breaker at the Benton substation open & reclose. At that time, they did not have a known cause for the breaker operation.  Hanford fire called to report a fire off Route 4 by Energy Northwest near the 115KV BPA power lines. After discussions with the BPA dispatcher the bump on the line or breaker operation, may have been caused by a fault on the BPA 115KV line causing the fire. BPA was dispatching a line crew to investigate.

 

H1 OpsInfo (EPO, OpsInfo)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:03, Wednesday 10 September 2025 (86824)
H1_DARM_FOM with O1 Sensitivity (For GW150914 Anniversary Tour)
J. Kissel

Ops corps -- please run the following DARM FOM template on the top, front-and-center, wall display from 08:00 to 12:00 PDT on Saturday (9/13).
    /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cds/h1/scripts/fom_startup/nuc30/
        H1_DARM_FOM_wO1.xml


Details:
For this upcoming Saturday's tours only, we'd like to celebrate how much the detector sensitivity has improved in the past 10 years by displaying the early O1 sensitivity (from G1501223), rather than show the L1 trace (whose live sensitivity will still be captured by the display of BNS range). 

As such, I've augmented the standard template from
    /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isc/h1/scripts/H1_DARM_FOM.xml
with the following changes.

    Functional:
        ** Changed the pwlech FFT chunk "% overlap" parameter to be 50%, rather than 75%, which is appropriate for the Hanning window specified to be used.
        ** Changed the number of rolling exponential averages parameter to be 10 rather than 3.
        - Updated the H1 reference from April 11 2024 (representing O4B sensitivity) to yesterday, September 09 2025, so as to better represent the O4C sensitivity 
        - Imported G1501223 H1 "start of O1" representative sensitivity, replacing the L1 reference.

        ** these will have the effect of "slowing down" the live traces, and/or making "glitches contaminate the sensitivity for longer," but this comes with the benefit of a better (less noisy) estimate of the current stationary noise. That makes it a more apples-to-apples comparison with the O1 sensitivity.

    Aesthetic:
        - Added "Displacement" to the "aLIGO DARM" title
        - Synchronized the format of the legend entries for the references
        - Updated the O1 reference trace color so it can be seen a bit better
        - Re-ordered the last three traces from "PCALY, GWINC, PCALX" to "PCALX, PCALY, GWINC" (while preserving the colors and symbols)
        - Moved the legend to be centered in the window, but still showing violin modes.


The attached screenshot is of this template running live yesterday afternoon.

The hope is that this version of the central display will still fully function as a monitor of how the detector is doing for observational readiness, but also work as a good display piece for the tours.
This can reverted to the standard template as soon as the tours are done.

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS (ISC)
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:06, Wednesday 10 September 2025 - last comment - 14:16, Wednesday 10 September 2025(86822)
IMC LSC/ASC Comparison from Satellite Amplifier Swap

Satellite amplifiers for MC1 and MC3 were swapped during maintenance (15:00-19:00 UTC) on July 22, 2025 (85922), and MC2 satamp had been swapped before that (85770). I wanted to see if we could determine any improvement in noise in the LSC and ASC input mode cleaner channels.

LSC Channel: 
    - H1:IMC-L_OUT_DQ
ASC Channels:
    - H1:IMC-MC2_TRANS_PIT_OUT_DQ
    - H1:IMC-MC2_TRANS_YAW_OUT_DQ
    - H1:IMC-WFS_A_DC_PIT_OUT_DQ
    - H1:IMC-WFS_A_DC_YAW_OUT_DQ
    - H1:IMC-WFS_B_DC_PIT_OUT_DQ
    - H1:IMC-WFS_B_DC_YAW_OUT_DQ
    - H1:IMC-WFS_A_I_PIT_OUT_DQ
    - H1:IMC-WFS_A_Q_PIT_OUT_DQ
    - H1:IMC-WFS_A_I_YAW_OUT_DQ
    - H1:IMC-WFS_A_Q_YAW_OUT_DQ
    - H1:IMC-WFS_B_I_PIT_OUT_DQ
    - H1:IMC-WFS_B_Q_PIT_OUT_DQ
    - H1:IMC-WFS_B_I_YAW_OUT_DQ
    - H1:IMC-WFS_B_Q_YAW_OUT_DQ

I looked at many times before and after these swaps looking for the lowest noise for each to be the best representative of the noise level we can achieve, and have settled on a set of before and after times that differ depending on the channel.
BEFORE:
2025-06-18 09:10 UTC (DARK RED)
2025-07-07 09:37 UTC (DARK BLUE)
AFTER:
2025-08-01 07:05 UTC (GREEN)
2025-08-01 10:15 UTC (PINK)
2025-08-02 08:38 UTC (SEA GREEN)
2025-09-05 05:23 UTC (ORANGE)
These measurements were taken for 47 averages with a 0.01 BW.

Results:

Channel                                                     Comments
H1:IMC-L_OUT_DQ Here the best 'after swap' time that I was able to find is noticeably worse than the best before time, so either the swap made the LSC noise worse, or we just haven't been able to reach that level of lowest noise again since the swap.
H1:IMC-MC2_TRANS_PIT_OUT_DQ Small noise drop between 0.8-3 Hz
H1:IMC-MC2_TRANS_YAW_OUT_DQ Slight noise drop between 0.6-3 Hz?
H1:IMC-WFS_A_DC_PIT_OUT_DQ Looks about the same as before, maybe a bit of improvement between 7-9.5 Hz
H1:IMC-WFS_A_DC_YAW_OUT_DQ Noise between 6-10 Hz has dropped slightly
H1:IMC-WFS_B_DC_PIT_OUT_DQ No difference
H1:IMC-WFS_B_DC_YAW_OUT_DQ No difference
H1:IMC-WFS_A_I_PIT_OUT_DQ Looks like the noise above 1 Hz has dropped slightly
H1:IMC-WFS_A_Q_PIT_OUT No difference
H1:IMC-WFS_A_I_YAW_OUT No difference
H1:IMC-WFS_A_Q_YAW_OUT No difference
H1:IMC-WFS_B_I_PIT_OUT Looks about the same as before, maybe a bit of improvement between 7-9.5 Hz. Showing the sea green AFTER trace to verify that the pink AFTER bump seen at 10 Hz is not an issue caused by the satamp swap.
H1:IMC-WFS_B_Q_PIT_OUT Looks about the same as before, maybe a bit of improvement between 7-9.5 Hz. Showing the sea green AFTER trace to verify that the pink AFTER bump seen at 10 Hz is not an issue caused by the satamp swap.
H1:IMC-WFS_B_I_YAW_OUT Looks about the same as before, maybe a bit of improvement between 7-9.5 Hz
H1:IMC-WFS_B_Q_YAW_OUT Looks about the same as before, maybe a bit of improvement between 7-9.5 Hz
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 11:09, Wednesday 10 September 2025 (86823)SQZ

The SQZ filter cavity version of this: 86624

jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 14:16, Wednesday 10 September 2025 (86833)IOO, ISC
The plots from LHO:86253 show the before vs. after M1 OSEM noise performance for 
    MC1
    MC2, and
    MC3.

Comparing the page 3 summaries of each of these .pdfs show that 
    - We only expect change between ~0.2 and ~8 Hz. So, any improvement seen in the 7 to 9.5 Hz region is very likely *not* related to the sat amp whitening change.
    - For MC2, the LF and RT OSEM degrees of freedom --  both the before and after traces show that L and Y are well above the expected noise floor below for the entire region below 10 Hz.
    - The change all DOFs is a broadband change in noise performance; not only is there nothing *sensed* by these OSEMs above ~5 Hz, but there's also no change and thus any resonance-like features that change in the IMC signals will not be related to the sat amp whitening filter change.

We should confirm that the data used for the MC2 "before vs after" were both taken with the IMC length control OFF (i.e. the IMC was OFFLINE).

Back to the IMC metrics -- 
    (1) Only IMC-L and the MC TRANS signals appear to be dominated by residual seismic / suspension noise below 10 Hz. Hence
        (a) I believe the improvement shown in the MC TRANS QPD, tho I would have expected more.
        (b) I believe that we're seeing something that is limited by seismic / suspension noise in IMC-L, but the fact that got worse doesn't agree with the top-mass OSEM's stated improvement from LHO:86253, so I suspect the story is more complicated.
    (2) it's clear that all of the DC "QPD" signals from the IMC WFS are not reading out anything seismically related below 10 Hz. Maybe this ASD shape is a function of the beam position? Maybe the real signal is drown out by ADC noise, i.e. the signal is only well-whitened above 10 Hz? Whatever it is, it's drowning out the improvements that we might have expected to see -- we don't see *any* of the typical residual seismic / suspension noise features.
    (3) WFS B RF signals appear to also be swamped by this same color of noise. WFS A RF signals show a similar color, but it's less in magnitude, so you see some residual seismic / suspension peaks popping up above it. But it's not low enough to show where we might expect the improvements -- the troughs between resonances. So given the quality of this metric, I'm not mad that we didn't see an improvement.

So -- again -- I really only think that metrics (1), i.e. IMC-L and MC2 TRANS are showing noise that is/was dominated by residual seismic / suspension noise below 10 Hz, so that's why we see no change in the IMC WFS signals; not because we didn't make an improvement in what they're *supposed* to be measuring.

We'll have to figure out what happened with IMC-L between June and Sep 2025, but the plethora of new high-Q (both "mechanical" and "digital") features between 3 and 10 Hz suggests that it's got nothing to do with the sat amp whitening improvement. The slope of increased broadband noise between 1 to 3 Hz doesn't match what we would  expect, nor does it match the demonstrated improvement in the local M1 OSEM sensors. We should check the DC signal levels, or change the window type, to be sure this isn't spectral leakage. 


H1 ISC
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:20, Wednesday 10 September 2025 (86820)
Range drop during this lock

Our range hasn't been the most stable during this lock. There's one drop in particular that goes down about 8Mpc to 145Mpc for 20min or so (attachment 1). Running our range comparison script, and changing the span appropriately (thanks Oli!), it looks to be a very broadband from ~40-200Hz. The SQZ BLRMS see something around that time (attachment 2).

Sheila had me run another template for that time. The template, which was copied from one of Camilla's, I've now saved in the sqz userapps - attachment 3. Green being the trace from this lock.

Images attached to this report
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:14, Wednesday 10 September 2025 (86821)
Wed CP1 Fill

Wed Sep 10 10:07:21 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 7min 17secs

Gerardo confirmed a good fill curbside.

Images attached to this report
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:31, Wednesday 10 September 2025 - last comment - 09:26, Wednesday 10 September 2025(86817)
Ops Day Shift Start

TITLE: 09/10 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 152Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Corey
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 10mph Gusts, 6mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.11 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: Locked for 5.5 hours, automated relock. Calm environment. Some dust alarms at the LAB1 station in the night, odd.

Plan for today is to observe.

Comments related to this report
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 09:26, Wednesday 10 September 2025 (86819)Lockloss

The lock loss over night didn't leave many clues as to what it could be (1441523038 [Sept 10 0703UTC]). ETMX L2 out and DARM IN1 seem to be the first to react to something, DARM possibly moving first.

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:11, Tuesday 09 September 2025 (86816)
Tuesday Ops Eve Shift End report.

TITLE: 09/10 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 154Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 14mph Gusts, 10mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.09 μm/s
SHIFT SUMMARY:
Only thing note worthy was a possible Superevent candidate : S250910b @ 00:07:52 UTC.

I didn't really hear any thunder either.


LOG:
No log



 

H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:32, Tuesday 09 September 2025 (86815)
Tuesday Ops Eve Shift Start

TITLE: 09/09 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 154Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: TJ
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 9mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.08 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
H1 has been locked for 2.75 hours.
All subsystems seem to be running smoothly.
The weather report suggests that there may be thunderstorms soon.

 

LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:28, Tuesday 09 September 2025 (86812)
Ops Day Shift End

TITLE: 09/09 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 154Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Tony
SHIFT SUMMARY: It was a pretty standard maintenance day with a few aftershocks from the oregon earthquake to slow down the reacquisition. Observing for 2.75hours.
LOG:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
14:44 SYS Betsy Opt Lab n In and out of lab for stuffs, quick into the LVEA for more parts 16:35
14:47 CEBEX Bubba, contractors MY n Drilling and surveying 22:41
15:00 SYS Randy OSB n Forklifting to mech room 15:22
15:00 FAC Kim EX n Tech clean 16:02
15:00 FAC Nelly EY n Tech clean 15:49
15:08 VAC Jordan, Gerardo, Anna LVEA n NEG pump regen, GV checks, valve in NEG 17:58
15:10 FAC Chris site n Forklifting from staging to woodshop area 17:00
15:15 CDS Fil LVEA n Cable trays near HAM5 with Ken & Drilling with Randy 18:54
15:15 FAC Ken LVEA n LVEA light replacement 18:49
15:22 FAC Christina VPW n Fork lifting 15:42
15:22 SYS Randy LVEA n W & E bay craning 17:22
15:30 SYS Mitchell LVEA n Grabbing parts 15:50
15:43 OPS Richard LVEA n Checking on things 16:03
15:47 VAC Janos MX, MY n Pump install work continuing 18:55
15:49 FAC Nelly, Kim FCES N Tech clean 16:55
15:58 GRD TJ CR n h1guardian1 reboot 16:07
16:38 PEM Sam, Jonathan (student) LVEA n Tour/ looking at PEM things 17:34
16:50 ISC Daniel LVEA n OMC whitening chassis removal 17:16
16:51 FAC Mitchell Mid X N moving pelican cases 17:38
16:51 TSC TJ Mech rm -> LVEA N Folling chiller lines 17:32
16:55 safety McCarthy LVEA N Checking on the LVEA safety 17:42
16:56 FAC Kim & Nelly High bay & LVEA N Technical cleaning garbing supplies 18:34
17:07 SUS Ryan C Crtl Rm N ETMX OPLEV SUS charge measurements 18:41
17:27 OPT Camilla LVEA, OpticsLab n Looking for parts 18:04
17:39 PCAL Tony, Mitchell PCAL Lab - Looking for parts 17:53
17:52 SYS Randy EY n Check in receiving 18:17
17:54 CDS Marc LVEA n Check in with Fil 18:04
18:18 SYS Randy LVEA n Take some measurements 18:34
18:32 - Richard, student OSB roof n Roof tour 18:47
18:42 VAC Jordan, Anna, Gerardo LVEA n Shut down NEG pump 19:14
18:51 - Oli LVEA n Sweep 18:58
19:09 FAC Tyler MY n Checking with crew down there 21:11
19:51 - Fil, Betsy LVEA n Measure something 20:11
21:47 SPI Jeff OpticsLab n Figuring out what is in the bag 21:59
H1 ISC
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:52, Tuesday 09 September 2025 (86814)
The correlated noise in O4b is different than O4c

I processed one hour of no-squeezing data taken in November 2024 (81468) for the purpose of running a correlated noise budget. This data was taken shortly after noise budget injections were run (80596), so I was able to use the measurement of the jitter noise to perform jitter subtraction from 100-1000 Hz, similar to my work in 85899.

I followed the same procedure as I documented in 85899: I plotted the whitened time series and saw two glitches, which I excised from the data by removing the individual segments with the glitches. I then mean-averaged the remaining segments. As a part of the correlated noise data collection in Nov 2024, we took a full calibration measurement, which I was able to use to generate a model to calibrate the DCPD signals. I used the IMC WFS yaw signal as a witness to subtract jitter from 100-1000 Hz. I then calculated the full correlated noise estimate also as described in 85899 (in that log I called it the "full classical noise estimate", which I now realize is confusing).

The comparison of the Nov 2024 time (O4b) and June 2025 time is shown here.

The noise below 100 Hz is lower in June 2025, however the noise above 100 Hz is higher in June 2025. It also appears that the slope of the noise above 100 Hz has changed slightly. The high frequency noise is also different, possibly because the frequency noise coupling to DARM has changed.

I also plotted the ratio of the noise from 40-300 Hz, showing that the noise below 100 Hz is reduced by up to 10% in amplitude, and above 100 Hz increase by up to 10% in amplitude.

I added the GWINC thermal noise trace to the plot above, and took the ratio of the correlated noise to the total thermal noise to that trace to highlight the change in noise. The ratio shows that the overall slope and amplitude of the excess noise, compared to the full thermal noise trace, has changed.

And going back even further, the correlated noise budget was run in O4a in Dec 2023, which we used in the O4 detector paper. We only had 900 seconds of data, so the results are more noisy. Comparing the three traces and comparing their ratios to the GWINC thermal noise trace. I did not do a jitter subtraction on the Dec 2023 data. The nearest valid calibration report is on Oct 27, which is what I used to calibrate the data.

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:52, Tuesday 09 September 2025 (86813)
Observing 2047 UTC

Maintenenace recovery was fairly straight forward but there were a few more aftershocks from Oregon that caused us to lose lock while acquiring. We eventually made it up at 2047UTC, with violins very elevated. I'll work on damping those a bit faster that the automated settings.

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:06, Monday 08 September 2025 - last comment - 09:13, Wednesday 10 September 2025(86795)
Electrical storm power glitch rebooted h1susaux[h2,ex]. PSL is having problems.

After the watchdogs were reset a lightening strike caused a power glitch. GC UPS reported going into and off of battery power.

h1susauxh2 and h1susauxex went offline, turned out they were rebooting themselves and came back after a few minutes.

PSL is in a bad way, Ibrahim is calling for support.

The lights in my house flickered at the time I saw the sus-aux machines go down. We have been having a storm roll over us for the past hour, moving from Oregon northwards.

Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 22:17, Monday 08 September 2025 (86797)

Ibrahim is on his way to the CER MEZ to reset the PSL REFCAV high-voltage supply.

david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 22:20, Monday 08 September 2025 (86798)

Back on.

Images attached to this comment
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 09:13, Wednesday 10 September 2025 (86818)

Here are details of the power glitches due to the electrical storm Monday night. We had a large glitch at 21:51:26 followed 5 seconds later by a smaller glitch.

Images attached to this comment
H1 AOS
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:11, Monday 08 September 2025 - last comment - 11:44, Wednesday 10 September 2025(86792)
Lockloss 04:09 UTC

Lockloss due to an EQ that hit before EQ mode could activate. Seems to be either very local or very large - not on USGS yet.

Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 11:44, Wednesday 10 September 2025 (86825)SEI

The University of Oregon station "DING" saw a large signal for this earthquake, ~30 seconds before we lost lock and ~10 seconds before we saw any ground motion on site. I believe the units for the picket-fence seismometers are in [nm].

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 81-100 of 84437.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End