Displaying reports 101-120 of 85836.Go to page Start 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End
Reports until 12:45, Wednesday 26 November 2025
LHO General
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:45, Wednesday 26 November 2025 (88256)
Ops Eve Shift Start

TITLE: 11/26 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan C
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 8mph Gusts, 5mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.16 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY: H1 is relocking and currently up to LOWNOISE_ESD_ETMX. More PEM measurements ongoing today and into this evening.

H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:32, Wednesday 26 November 2025 (88249)
OPS Wednesday DAY shift summary

TITLE: 11/26 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan S
SHIFT SUMMARY: We've had two locklosses today, both while people where out on the floor. Relocking has been fairly automated, we had a TCS CO2Y laser issue that we resolved. We are relocking at MOVE_SPOTS as of 20:30 UTC. LVEA zone4G got a bit warm but its leveled out.
LOG:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
16:47 PEM Robert LVEA N Set up measurements, check on zone4 17:05
17:31 PEM Robert LVEA N Setup shaker in *danger zone*, in and out 20:18
17:34 ISC Kar Meng Optics lab LOCAL OPO work 19:27
18:56 TCS Sheila LVEA N Reset CO2Y 19:11
19:38 FAC Tyler Mids N Find boom lift and inflate the tires 20:06
19:54 TCS Daniel, Sheila LVEA N Wiggle TCS CO2Y cable 20:03
H1 SQZ (SQZ)
karmeng.kwan@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:16, Wednesday 26 November 2025 - last comment - 13:30, Wednesday 26 November 2025(88254)
VOPO 532nm/1064nm into M1 alignment

Both the pump (532nm) and fundamental (1064nm) have now been alignment to the VOPO cavity based on the mode matching setup described in this log

From the mirror specification (C2500221), the theoretical escape efficiency is calculated to be 98.5% (derived from the decay rate of the mirror, k_in,r / k_in,tot).

The escape efficiency from the VOPO reflection is 97.9% (calculated from the photodiode reflection, trans/refl = (2nesc - 1)^2).

In short, input alignment done, rear seed injection is the next to go, escape efficiency checked, and the photons escaping the cavity with the enthusiasm of a PhD student during a conference lunch break.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
karmeng.kwan@LIGO.ORG - 13:30, Wednesday 26 November 2025 (88258)

For the escape efficiency measurement, the transmission field refer to the light entering and exiting the cavity via M1 (shown as the "dip" on the reflection photodiode). Whereas the reflected field refer to the promptly reflected light from the photodiode (shown at the flat line on the reflection photodiode).

The measured escape efficiency is consisted with the measurement done at MIT (E2500270), where escape efficiency of 97.9% to 98.2% was reported for various crystal position.

H1 General (Lockloss)
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:01, Wednesday 26 November 2025 (88255)
19:58 UTC lockloss

19:58 UTC lockloss, there was a big fuzzy oscillation in PR_GAIN right before LL

LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:22, Wednesday 26 November 2025 (88252)
Wed CP1 Fill

Wed Nov 26 10:05:20 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 5min 16secs

 

Images attached to this report
H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:51, Wednesday 26 November 2025 - last comment - 11:37, Wednesday 26 November 2025(88251)
17:50 UTC lockloss

17:50 UTC lockloss, there was an ISI BS saturation a few seconds after the lockloss.

Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 11:37, Wednesday 26 November 2025 (88253)

19:18 NLN but we've encountered a TCS CO2Y issue, the laser tripped off and doesn't want to come back.

H1 SQZ
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:03, Wednesday 26 November 2025 - last comment - 18:19, Wednesday 26 November 2025(88250)
ADF sweeps and CO2 steps

Kevin, Sheila

Over the last few days we've run ADF sweeps a few times.  Here's a record of what happened and file names.  

The files are in /ligo/gitcommon/squeezing/sqzutils/data

 Nov 22 08:31 HF_10kHz_11_2025.h5 IFO had been powered up for 11:00, sweep started at about 14:50 UTC Nov 22.  NLG 24.3, measurement is in 88224.   Something seemed to go wrong towards the end of the sweep, we aren't sure what. 
 Nov 22 12:38 HF_10kHz_11_2025_2.h5  IFo had been powered up for 15:10, same lock as the previous measurement, same NLG measurement, sweep started at about 19 UTC.  

Nov 25 00:36 HF_10kHz_11_2025_b4_CO2_step.h5  IFO had been powered up for 4:20, in this sweep I didn't turn off the SQZ angle servo based on the ADF, so the demod phase was moved around during the sweep, making this data not useful.

Nov 26 01:56 HF_10kHz_11_2025_b4_CO2_step2.h5 last night's first scan, started only 38 minutes after power up at about 8:18 UTC Nov 26th.  The amplified seed was 7.8e-3, unamplified seed didn't happen correctly with the script but the waveplate hasn't moved since previous measurements of that level at 2.9e-4 (88223), giving an NLG of 26.9.  (Edit, I redid the unamplified seed measurement, it looks like 3.2e-4 now, making the NLG 24.4 for these last two measurements, which has been consistent (24.3 or 24.4) for the last week. 

Nov 26 08:15 HF_10kHz_11_2025_after_CO2_1hour.h5 this morning's sweep, IFO had been powered up for 7 hours, CO2s had been stepped from 1.7W each to 0.9W each for 1.5 hours when the sweep started at about 14:37 UTC Nov 26th. NLG should be the same as for above, 26.9.   24.4

Comments related to this report
kevin.kuns@LIGO.ORG - 18:19, Wednesday 26 November 2025 (88264)

The goal of these measurements is to use the ADF to measure the rotation of the squeezed state around higher order mode arm cavity resonances as described in section IV.B of LIGO-P2500132. Ultimately we would like to be able to use such measurements to diagnose the thermal state as a guide in how to tune TCS in order to improve mode matching.

While we are still digesting the results, the first plot shows the preliminary inferred squeezed state rotation for the three good data sets that we got. pre-step 1 and pre-step 2 are the two taken on Nov 22. (Everything turned out to be fine with the first sweep.) post-step is the last one taken this morning after the CO2s had been stepped and the IFO had been up for 7 hours. There is a small arbitrary constant offset in the SQZ angle of order a degree, so all angles have been shifted to be zero at 10.450 kHz. The second plot shows the OMC DCPD spectra 5 min before the start of each of these three sweeps.

Two rotation peaks are visible rather than the one shown in Fig 7 of P2500132. This is expected since the arms are astigmatic in reality, and our more detailed models show the same behavior. Each eigenmode is resonant at a slightly different frequency and is responsible for a rotation as in Fig 7 which are superimposed as observed in this data.

The post-step rotation is slightly smaller in magnitude and is shifted to slightly lower frequencies. Since the CO2 is mainly a higher order actuator, this is consistent with our expectations that this rotation is predominantly sensitive to quadratic mismatch with higher order aberrations altering the detailed behavior. However, seeing as how the pre-step was not taken just prior to the CO2 step in the same lock, I think it's just as likely that this is due to it being in a slightly different thermal state before the CO2 step. The peaks in the OMC DCPD spectra also appear slightly lower in frequency for the post-step.

I think the main takeaway from these measurements so far is showing that we can measure this rotation and resolve changes on the scale that our modeling suggests would be useful.

This analysis was done in the aligoNB environment by running
pytest /ligo/gitcommon/squeezing/sqzutils/analysis/T_10kHz_ADF.py --tb short -s -k T_Nov_CO2_step

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:28, Wednesday 26 November 2025 - last comment - 07:36, Wednesday 26 November 2025(88247)
OPS Wednesday DAY shift start

TITLE: 11/26 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 146Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 7mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.17 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 07:36, Wednesday 26 November 2025 (88248)

15:33 UTC GRB-Short E619679

H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:48, Tuesday 25 November 2025 - last comment - 20:32, Tuesday 25 November 2025(88239)
OPS Tuesday EVE shift summary

TITLE: 11/26 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY: We had 2 locklosses, the first was easy to recover from, the second is still in progress. We're at MAX_POWER right now.
LOG:      

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
00:16 PEM Rene, Alicia CER N Setup measurement, huddle test 00:33
00:20 ISC Kar Meng Optics lab LOCAL OPO work 01:13
00:21 ISC Marc Optics lab LOCAL Help with osciliscope issue 00:59
00:52 PEM Robert, Sam EndX N Setup measurement 01:20
Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 20:32, Tuesday 25 November 2025 (88246)

04:10 UTC NLN

04:30 UTC We went into Obseving after I cleared a leftover EX PEM EXC

H1 General (Lockloss)
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:25, Tuesday 25 November 2025 - last comment - 19:12, Tuesday 25 November 2025(88244)
01:21 UTC lockloss

01:21 UTC lockloss

It looked just like the previous lockloss but larger, it was an ETMX glitch a 1/4 sec before the lockloss. 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 19:12, Tuesday 25 November 2025 (88245)

03:12 UTC lockloss at LOW_NOISE_ESD_ETMY

H1 DetChar (DetChar)
alicia.calafat@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:57, Tuesday 25 November 2025 (88241)
Fast-shutter lock-loss study: trigger-to-10-percent rise times
[Alicia Calafat, Joan-Rene Merou, Sheila Dwyer]

Lock-loss events at the AS port can send short, high-power optical pulses towards the photodiodes. At full-power operation these pulses can carry of order tens of joules in a few milliseconds, which is potentially hazardous for the InGaAs diodes if not mitigated. The fast shutter in HAM6 (TOASTR) protects the AS port by inserting a mirror into the beam and dumping the pulse into a dedicated beam dump.
Previous aLOGs have highlighted the importance of understanding the fast shutter response during lock losses:
- In November 2024, "Fast shutter bouncing happens with an inconvenient timing" (aLOG 81130) reported a lock loss around tGPS ≃ 1415043099 where the fast shutter, after closing, briefly bounced open again roughly when the power into HAM6 reached its maximum (~760 W). The energy deposited into HAM6 was estimated to be ≃ 17 J, with ≃ 12 J leaking past the shutter due to the bounce.
- In June 2025, "OPS Monday day shift start" (aLOG 85393) described a lock loss at ≃ 100 kW circulating power that did not trigger the fast shutter. The maximum power at HAM6 (~1.4 W) stayed below the analogue fast shutter trigger threshold (≃ 3-4 W). The same PEM channel was used to estimate the power incident on HAM6, and it was noted that the calibration in this configuration is a factor of 10 smaller than in observation mode because the 90:10 beam diverter was open.
These and related reports motivate a more systematic study of the timing of the fast shutter response during lock losses, in particular the trigger-to-10-percent rise time inferred from the HAM6 PEM channel. As a secondary quantity, we also keep track of the energy deposited in HAM6 to flag potentially dangerous high-energy pulses. Data and calibration
The analysis is based on a list of lock-loss events stored in a JSON file (index.cgi.json), each with an event id, a nominal GPS time and a refined GPS time.
For each event, the script reads the PEM channel
H1:PEM-CS_ADC_5_19_2K_OUT_DQ
at 2048 Hz over a symmetric window around the refined GPS time. The channel is recorded in ADC counts and converted to physical power in watts with a single calibration factor CALIBRATION_W_PER_COUNT, which depends on the optical configuration:
- Observation mode (beam diverter in nominal configuration): about 0.177 W/count, consistent with the estimates in aLOG 81130.
- Configuration with the 90:10 beam diverter open: the PEM sees about ten times less power and the effective calibration is reduced by a factor of 10, i.e. 0.0177 W/count, as explicitly stated in aLOG 85393.
For the present study the default calibration is CALIBRATION_W_PER_COUNT = 0.0177, corresponding to the beam diverter open configuration. All reported powers are in watts and all integrated quantities are in joules. If one wants to compare directly with the energies quoted in aLOG 81130, the same script can be re-run with CALIBRATION_W_PER_COUNT = 0.177, in which case all energies scale up by a factor 10. Definition of peak, trigger level and 10-percent point
For each event the script computes:
- The peak power at HAM6, defined as the maximum of the calibrated power time series P(t) in the analysis window (peak_value_W, at time peak_time_gps).
- A pre-event plateau level, defined as the median of P(t) before the peak.
- A 10-percent-of-peak level, ten_percent_power_W = 0.1 x peak_value_W, and the corresponding time on the rising edge, rise_10pct_time_gps (first sample where P(t) ≥ 0.1 x peak_value_W and t ≤ peak_time_gps).
- An effective trigger level, trigger_level_W, used as a proxy for the fast-shutter trigger threshold. By default this is 0.2 W, but for a handful of events it is raised to a larger value to avoid small pre-pulses (see below). The trigger time trigger_time_gps is defined as the first sample where P(t) ≥ trigger_level_W on the rising side.
- The effective trigger-to-10-percent rise time, trigger_to_10pct_time_s = rise_10pct_time_gps - trigger_time_gps, which quantifies how quickly the HAM6 power grows from the effective trigger level to 10 percent of its peak during the lock loss.
- The deposited energy in the main pulse, integrated_energy_J, computed by integrating P(t) from the trigger up-crossing to the first down-crossing of the same trigger level after the peak, using a trapezoidal rule in time. Per-event trigger tuning
In most lock losses the nominal trigger level of 0.2 W lies well below the main peak and above any pre-event fluctuations, so the first up-crossing of 0.2 W is a good proxy for when the shutter would be triggered.
However, in several events the 0.2 W line is already crossed by small bumps before the main pulse. In these cases the nominal 0.2 W crossing is clearly too early compared to the onset of the main lock-loss pulse, and the resulting trigger_to_10pct_time_s would not characterize the main burst but instead include a long interval over a small pre-pulse.
To avoid this, the script allows per-event overrides of trigger_level_W. For a small number of GPS times, the trigger level is manually raised so that it sits above the pre-pulse but still below the main peak. The set of events with custom trigger levels is encoded in the CUSTOM_TRIGGER_LEVELS dictionary in the script and currently includes events at:
- GPS 1443656698
- GPS 1443956187
- GPS 1444867592
- GPS 1445889945
- GPS 1446288577
- GPS 1446552568
- GPS 1446642040
For these events, the diagnostic plots show the higher trigger level as a horizontal line and use its first up-crossing to define trigger_time_gps. CSV summary
All per-event measurements are written to: outputs/lockloss_log.csv with one row per lock loss. The columns are:
- event_id: string identifier of the event copied from index.cgi.json.
- event_gps: refined GPS time of the lock loss (s).
- peak_time_gps: GPS time at which the peak power is reached (s).
- peak_value_W: peak power at HAM6 (W).
- ten_percent_power_W: 10 percent of the peak power (W).
- trigger_time_gps: GPS time at which P(t) first reaches the effective trigger level (s). For most events the trigger level is 0.2 W; for a handful of events it is raised as described above.
- rise_10pct_time_gps: GPS time at which P(t) first reaches 10 percent of the peak on the rising side (s).
- trigger_to_10pct_time_s: difference between rise_10pct_time_gps and trigger_time_gps (s).
- integrated_energy_J: time integral of P(t) between the trigger up-crossing and the first down-crossing after the peak (J).
To give a compact overview of the CSV content, the table below shows the first five rows of the current file, illustrating the typical numerical values one obtains:
event_id event_gps [s] peak_time_gps [s] peak_value_W [W] ten_percent_power_W [W] trigger_time_gps [s] rise_10pct_time_gps [s] trigger_to_10pct_time_s [s] integrated_energy_J [J]
1442831740 1442831739.506836 1442831739.550293 76.23296356201172 7.623296356201172 1442831739.5288086 1442831739.5410156 0.01220703125 0.7808257855358534
1442889453 1442889452.898926 1442889452.9663086 61.84770584106445 6.184770584106445 1442889452.8920898 1442889452.9282227 0.0361328125 1.674310484304442
1442904451 1442904451.206055 1442904451.2641602 81.97347259521484 8.197347259521484 1442904451.2441406 1442904451.255371 0.01123046875 0.8560717486398062
1442926321 1442926320.563965 1442926320.625 73.39449310302734 7.339449310302735 1442926320.5576172 1442926320.5947266 0.037109375 1.6212408712308388
1443044104 1443044104.236328 1443044104.3188477 66.14673614501953 6.614673614501953 1443044104.227539 1443044104.2773438 0.0498046875 1.7385223870514892
Several events in the CSV naturally share exactly the same value of trigger_to_10pct_time_s, even though the lock losses occur on different days. This is expected because the data are sampled at 2048 Hz, so any time difference is an integer multiple of the sampling interval Delta_t = 1/2048 s ≈ 0.000488 s. If the trigger and the 10-percent point are separated by N samples, the measured time is T = N/2048 s. Small physical variations in the true trigger-to-10-percent time that are smaller than one sampling interval cannot be resolved and collapse onto the same discrete set of allowed values N/2048 s in the CSV. Diagnostic plots:
For each event, the script produces a PNG figure
lockloss_H1_PEM-CS_ADC_5_19_2K_OUT_DQ_.png
with two panels ("Zoom out" and "Zoom in") showing:
- The calibrated power P(t) in watts.
- A shaded region corresponding to the integrated pulse, with the integrated energy in the legend.
- Vertical lines at the peak time, at the effective trigger-time crossing, and at the 10-percent-of-peak crossing.
- Horizontal lines for the plateau power and for the effective trigger level.
The first figure below shows a representative event analysed with the nominal trigger level of 0.2 W. In the legend one can read the peak time and peak power, the time and value of the 10-percent-of-peak crossing, the trigger-time crossing at 0.2 W, the plateau power, and the integrated energy of the pulse. The zoomed panel highlights the plateau, the rapid rise into the main burst, and the decay back towards zero:
Example lock-loss event analysed with the nominal 0.2 W trigger level
For a small subset of events, a pre-pulse or slow ramp above the plateau made the nominal 0.2 W level unsuitable as a proxy for the fast-shutter trigger. In those cases the trigger level was raised so that trigger_time_gps is associated with the onset of the main burst rather than with the earlier structure. The following figures illustrate these cases, in order of GPS time and with the corresponding custom trigger levels used in the analysis:
- GPS 1443656698, trigger level raised to 1.0 W:
Lock-loss event at GPS 1443656698 with trigger level raised to 1.0 W - GPS 1443956187, trigger level raised to 0.6 W:
Lock-loss event at GPS 1443956187 with trigger level raised to 0.6 W - GPS 1444867592, trigger level raised to 1.0 W:
Lock-loss event at GPS 1444867592 with trigger level raised to 1.0 W - GPS 1445889945, trigger level raised to 0.3 W:
Lock-loss event at GPS 1445889945 with trigger level raised to 0.3 W - GPS 1446288577, trigger level raised to 2.5 W:
Lock-loss event at GPS 1446288577 with trigger level raised to 2.5 W - GPS 1446552568, trigger level raised to 0.5 W:
Lock-loss event at GPS 1446552568 with trigger level raised to 0.5 W - GPS 1446642040, trigger level raised to 8.0 W:
Lock-loss event at GPS 1446642040 with trigger level raised to 8.0 W Taken together, these examples show that a single nominal trigger level of 0.2 W is adequate for the majority of the sample, but a small number of events benefit from per-event tuning to avoid contamination from pre-pulses or slow ramps when measuring the trigger-to-10-percent rise time. Histogram of trigger-to-10-percent rise times
Once all events in index.cgi.json have been processed, the script reads the accumulated CSV and constructs two 1D histograms of trigger_to_10pct_time_s:
- A histogram with continuous bins.
- A discrete stacked-bar plot where each distinct time value appears once on the x-axis and the bar height counts how many lock losses share that value. For each value, the bar is split into a grey portion for events using the nominal trigger level (0.2 W) and a red portion for events where a custom trigger level was used.
The histogram, produced as
trigger_to_10pct_histogram_classic.png
illustrates the overall distribution of trigger-to-10-percent rise times. An example is shown here:
1D histogram of trigger-to-10-percent rise times The second plot, produced as
trigger_to_10pct_time_distribution.png
makes the discrete nature of the allowed times and the relative contribution of nominal vs. custom trigger levels more explicit. Each x-tick corresponds to one distinct trigger_to_10pct_time_s value found in the CSV, and the bar is split between nominal (grey) and custom (red) triggers:
Discrete stacked-bar distribution of trigger-to-10-percent rise times Because the PEM channel is sampled at 2048 Hz, all trigger-to-10-percent times fall on a discrete grid T = N/2048 s. The discrete histogram shows that only a small set of such N values occur frequently, reflecting the repeatable shape of the fast-shutter pulse in this configuration. The red portions highlight that only a small subset of events required raising the trigger level to avoid pre-pulses; the bulk of the sample is well described by the nominal 0.2 W level.
Images attached to this report
LHO General
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:48, Tuesday 25 November 2025 (88243)
Ops Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 11/26 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan C
SHIFT SUMMARY: Maintenance day went pretty smoothly and wrapped up mid-morning. After running an alignment, locking went smoothly, but H1 lost lock after 1 minute at low noise. Relocking after that went smoothly also, but took just a bit longer. Since then, PEM measurements have been ongoing and H1 has been locked for just over 2 hours.

LOG:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
15:56 FAC Ken LVEA N Outlet work BSC1/2 18:09
15:56 FAC Richard LVEA N Showing Ken the outlet 16:13
15:59 FAC Eric MER N Replacing heating element 16:28
16:14 FAC Nellie EY N Technical cleaning 17:22
16:16 CDS Erik Remote N Rebooting h1susauxe{x,y} 16:17
16:20 VAC Gerardo EX N Turning on compressor 18:01
16:26 FAC Kim EX N Technical cleaning 17:53
16:28 FAC Eric Site N Running fire pumps 17:07
16:29 CDS Fil LVEA N Pulling JAC cables [HAM1/2 to SAFE] 18:59
16:30 VAC Jordan LVEA N Measurements near Y-BTM 16:40
16:47 CDS Marc LVEA N Pulling JAC cables 18:59
16:54 CDS Daniel LVEA N Pulling JAC cables 18:59
16:59 VAC Jordan EX N Compressor 18:01
17:03 CDS Jackie LVEA N Pulling JAC cables 18:59
17:34 FAC Richard LVEA N Checking on Ken 17:43
17:35 FAC Nellie FCES N Technical cleaning 18:31
18:10 FAC Richard LVEA N Taking pictures 18:22
18:13 VAC Jordan LVEA N Measurements at HAM6 septum 18:18
18:20 FAC Kim LVEA N Technical cleaning 19:24
18:31 FAC Nellie LVEA N Technical cleaning 19:16
18:46 PEM Robert, Rene, Alicia CER N Setting up magnetometers 19:46
18:55 ISC Keita, Kar Meng Opt Lab N OPO work 19:35
19:25 VAC Jordan, Gerardo EX N Shutting down compressor 19:53
20:57 ISC Kar Meng Opt Lab Local OPO work 00:03
21:21 CDS Jackie MY N Delivering parts 21:57
22:41 ISC Sheila Opt Lab Local OPO work 23:08
00:16 PEM Rene, Alicia CER N Setup measurement, huddle test 00:33
00:20 ISC Kar Meng Optics lab LOCAL OPO work Ongoing
00:21 ISC Marc Optics lab LOCAL Help with osciliscope issue Ongoing
H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:08, Tuesday 25 November 2025 (88242)
OPS Tuesday EVE shift start

TITLE: 11/26 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan S
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 5mph Gusts, 3mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.21 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

H1 General (ISC, OpsInfo, SUS, TCS)
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:25, Tuesday 25 November 2025 - last comment - 11:47, Tuesday 25 November 2025(88237)
safe.snap reconciling

In prep for the upcoming CDS upgrades and vent Ryan, Jennie, and I went through the safe SDFs and accepted any values we thought needed it. We accepted all of the sus alignment sliders and checked on things like th IMC PZTs. The HWS had the center cross positions different, accepted. The ZM5 SAMS servo limit was also accepted.

We did our best combing through other subsystems and checking on both monitored and unmonitored channels, and they looked good to our eyes by either being automation controlled or reverted in SDF revert.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - 11:47, Tuesday 25 November 2025 (88238)

SDFs for input arm optics' safe.snap tables

Images attached to this comment
H1 DetChar (DetChar)
joan-rene.merou@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:26, Thursday 13 November 2025 - last comment - 13:28, Wednesday 26 November 2025(88089)
With voltage set to 0, grounding of the ITMX ESD driver
[Joan-Rene Merou, Alicia Calafat, Sheila Dwyer, Jenne Driggers]

We have entered the LVEA and went to the Beer garden. There, we first turned off the Low Voltage ITM ESD Driver D1600092, first the 15V switch and then the medium voltage switch. In order to turn it on again, it should be reconnected in the opposite order. With the voltage request set to 0 and chassis powered off, we have unplugged the SHV cables going to the chamber and plugged into Robert's ground boxes, which we used to ground to the rack which is grounded to the chamber. This has been done at both drivers (See attached photos).

Afterwards, we have changed the code at /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isc/h1/guardian/ISC_LOCK.py in order that the LOWNOISE_COIL_DRIVERS will go to LOWNOISE_ESD_ETMY instead of TRANSITION_FROM_ETMX. This has been done by changing lines 6670 and 6674, moving the ", 15" step from line 6670 to 6674. Finally, we communicated the change to the operator and loaded the guardian.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
joan-rene.merou@LIGO.ORG - 13:28, Wednesday 26 November 2025 (88257)
It appears that the grounding did not decrease the amplitude of the combs. As seen in the attached figure, the relative amplitude of the first harmonics of the combs remains mostly the same before and after the change on November 13th.
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 ISC
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:25, Monday 27 October 2025 - last comment - 13:39, Tuesday 25 November 2025(87768)
DRMI Inventory log

Some DRMI locking info

MICH, PRCL, SRCL filter banks during the "acquire DRMI 1f" state before the lock is grabbed.

OLGs for MICH, PRCL, SRCL after 1F acquisition, DRMI ASC engaged.

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 14:51, Tuesday 28 October 2025 (87807)

MICH, PRCL, SRCL filter banks when DRMI 1F is locked, settings for the measurement time above.

Images attached to this comment
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 15:02, Friday 21 November 2025 (88199)

PRMI OLGs

Images attached to this comment
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - 13:39, Tuesday 25 November 2025 (88240)ISC

PRCL and MICH filter banks while PRMI is locked before PRMI ASC is turned on.

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 101-120 of 85836.Go to page Start 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End