J. Kissel, B. Lantz, E. Bonilla, D. Barker ECR E2400405 IIET 32526 WP 12459 Using a linear combination of LHO:83724, the google slides in G2402303, and talking to Brian/Edgard who arrived for their week long visit today -- we installed the OSEM estimator infrastructure today on PR3 *and* SR3. We've only filled in enough infrastructure to ensure that it's function is entirely OFF. Hopefully we'll get further this week. The new channels have been initialized in the safe.snap for PR3 and SR3. /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h1/burtfiles/ h1suspr3_down.snap h1sussr3_safe.snap We made edits to Brian / Edgard's work on common library parts, /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/common/models HLTS_MASTER_W_EST.mdl SIXOSEM_T_STAGE_MASTER_W_EST.mdl medm screens /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/common/medm/hxts SUS_CUST_HLTS_OVERVIEW_W_EST.adl /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/common/medm/estim/ ESTIMATOR_OVERVIEW.adl CONTROL_6.adl (see attached notes for details). And then I made edits to /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isi/h1/models/ h1isiham2.mdl h1isiham5.mdl to add PCIE Dolphin IPC senders to send out the calibrated ISI HAM ST1 GS13s that are pre-projected into the PR3 and SR3 suspension point euler basis, and then modified /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h1/models/ h1suspr3.mdl h1sussr3.mdl top level models to receive those IPC, and pipe them in to top of the new main libary part, the HLTS_MASTER_W_EST.mdl Finally, after Dave installed the model changes and restarted the ISIs and HLTSs, we edited the sitemap /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cds/h1/medm/ SITEMAP.adl to use the HLTS_OVERVIEW_W_EST.adl. Everything file I mention above has been committed to its respective location in the svn. Screenshots of stuff will come in the comments.
h1isiham2 top level BEFORE vs. AFTER, focusing on the change to the output CART to PR3 EUL Suspension Point projections of IPC senders.
h1isiham5 top level BEFORE vs. AFTER, focusing on the change to the output CART to SR3 EUL Suspension Point projections of IPC senders.
Top level of h1suspr3 BEFORE vs. two AFTERs, one focusing on the IPC and the other on the main library block.
HLTS_MASTER_W_EST.mdl screenshot focusing on where the suspension point signals come in.
Some detail on the M1 block inside the HLTS_MASTER_W_EST, because I've cleaned up how the ISIFF is added into the ISC signals. This is the SIXOSEM_T_STAGE_MASTER_W_EST block. Part of the cleanup is to create a new subsystem block ADDFF, so we now have EPICs monitors and test points before and after the ADD. These will be useful for commissioning.
Here's the HLTS MEDM screen overview now, with the new parts highlighted. The second attachment here is a preview of what the infrastructure.
Edgard, Oli
In 83662 it was discussed that the osem compensating filter z:p = 10:0.4 wasn't as accurate as it should be. Jeff worked out that the zero and pole from the satamp are 0.3835 Hz and 10.6103 Hz, respectively, so our compensating filter should be the opposite of that, with a zero at 10.6 Hz and a pole at 0.38 Hz.
Today we updated those filters for PR3 and SR3. They appear in all three stages in the initial OSEMINF filter bank (FM1) (H1:SUS-PR3_M{1,2,3}_OSEMINF_{sensor}) as well as in all three stages of the watchdog bandpass filter bank (FM6) (H1:SUS-PR3_M{1,2,3}_WD_OSEMAC_BANDLIM_{sensor}). So where before those filters there were 10:0.4, they now read 10.6:0.38 and have these updated zero and pole values. We've loaded in the coefficient changes.
I've attached the script that we used to update these filters below. It's an edit of Jeff's script in 80189
Edgard, Oli, Brian
Checking on the sat amp compensation filter change from 10:0.4 to 10.6:0.38, we noticed that it has the net effect of decreasing the OSEM signal with respect to before the change [see first attachement].
The compensation would make the OSEM corrections from 83605 about 5-6% larger, which we can estimate by looking at the ratio between the new compensation filter and the old compensation filter. [see second attachment].
WP12459 Prototype Estimator
Jeff K, Brian L, Edgar B, Jonathan H, Erik VR, Dave B
We installed new models for h1isiham2, h1isiham5, h1suspr3 and h1sussr3. DAQ restart was required.
WP12458 New ISI HAM1 Guardian nodes
TJ, Dave B
TJ installed four new guardian nodes, these were added to EDC and a DAQ restart was required.
DAQ Restart
Jonathan H, Dave B.
DAQ was restarted for model changes and EDC additions. Because we are in a vent we elected to do an old-fashioned restart whereby the Trend Writers are not turned off prior to the restart of the EDC in order to maximize the vacuum trend data stream. This does mean that systems following guardian in the edcumaster.txt file will see outliers when using NDS1.
Restart sequence was: 0-leg + EDC, then 1-leg when fw0 had restarted.
Here is a summary of the model changes:
h1isiham2
Total number of DAQ changes = +17 slow
IPC: 5 Added Senders
H1:FEC-56_IPC_ISI_HAM2_SUSPOINT_PR3_P_OUT_IPC
H1:FEC-56_IPC_ISI_HAM2_SUSPOINT_PR3_R_OUT_IPC
H1:FEC-56_IPC_ISI_HAM2_SUSPOINT_PR3_T_OUT_IPC
H1:FEC-56_IPC_ISI_HAM2_SUSPOINT_PR3_V_OUT_IPC
H1:FEC-56_IPC_ISI_HAM2_SUSPOINT_PR3_Y_OUT_IPC
h1isiham5
Total number of DAQ changes = +17 slow
IPC: 5 Added Senders
H1:FEC-62_IPC_ISI_HAM5_SUSPOINT_SR3_P_OUT_IPC
H1:FEC-62_IPC_ISI_HAM5_SUSPOINT_SR3_R_OUT_IPC
H1:FEC-62_IPC_ISI_HAM5_SUSPOINT_SR3_T_OUT_IPC
H1:FEC-62_IPC_ISI_HAM5_SUSPOINT_SR3_V_OUT_IPC
H1:FEC-62_IPC_ISI_HAM5_SUSPOINT_SR3_Y_OUT_IPC
h1suspr3
Total number of DAQ changes = +72 fast +555 slow (total +627 chans)
(627 additions, 0 deletions)
All 72 fast chans added are acquired at 512Hz, increasing DAQ load by +148kB for a new total of 472kB
IPC: 6 Added Receivers
H1:FEC-37_IPC_ISI_HAM2_SUSPOINT_PR3_L_OUT_IPC (created 10mar2023)
H1:FEC-37_IPC_ISI_HAM2_SUSPOINT_PR3_P_OUT_IPC (new)
H1:FEC-37_IPC_ISI_HAM2_SUSPOINT_PR3_R_OUT_IPC (new)
H1:FEC-37_IPC_ISI_HAM2_SUSPOINT_PR3_T_OUT_IPC (new)
H1:FEC-37_IPC_ISI_HAM2_SUSPOINT_PR3_V_OUT_IPC (new)
H1:FEC-37_IPC_ISI_HAM2_SUSPOINT_PR3_Y_OUT_IPC (new)
h1sussr3
Total number of DAQ changes = +72 fast +555 slow (total +627 chans)
(627 additions, 0 deletions)
All 72 fast chans added are acquired at 512Hz, increasing DAQ load by +148kB for a new total of 469kB
IPC: 6 Added Receivers
H1:FEC-44_IPC_ISI_HAM5_SUSPOINT_SR3_L_OUT_IPC (created 10mar2023)
H1:FEC-44_IPC_ISI_HAM5_SUSPOINT_SR3_P_OUT_IPC (new)
H1:FEC-44_IPC_ISI_HAM5_SUSPOINT_SR3_R_OUT_IPC (new)
H1:FEC-44_IPC_ISI_HAM5_SUSPOINT_SR3_T_OUT_IPC (new)
H1:FEC-44_IPC_ISI_HAM5_SUSPOINT_SR3_V_OUT_IPC (new)
H1:FEC-44_IPC_ISI_HAM5_SUSPOINT_SR3_Y_OUT_IPC (new)
Mon14Apr2025
LOC TIME HOSTNAME MODEL/REBOOT
13:53:40 h1seih23 h1isiham2
13:54:17 h1sush2a h1suspr3
13:54:50 h1seih45 h1isiham5
13:55:37 h1sush56 h1sussr3
13:56:56 h1daqdc0 [DAQ] <<< 0-leg restart
13:57:05 h1daqfw0 [DAQ]
13:57:05 h1daqtw0 [DAQ]
13:57:06 h1daqnds0 [DAQ]
13:57:14 h1daqgds0 [DAQ]
13:57:23 h1susauxb123 h1edc[DAQ] <<< EDC restart while 0-leg down
14:01:10 h1daqdc1 [DAQ] <<< 1-leg restart
14:01:17 h1daqfw1 [DAQ]
14:01:18 h1daqnds1 [DAQ]
14:01:18 h1daqtw1 [DAQ] <<< TW1 resyncs with new EDC config
14:01:25 h1daqgds1 [DAQ]
14:02:08 h1daqgds1 [DAQ] <<< GDS1 needed a second restart
In preparation for the new HAM1 ISI and the new PM1 suspension, I've created and started 3 SEI Guardian nodes - ISI_HAM1, SEI_HAM1, ISI_HAM1_BLND. I've also created and started SUS_PM1. These have been added to the Guardian overview screen, and a DAQ restart is immanent. Total node count is now 173.
While prepping the code for the other SEI nodes I noticed that ISI_HAM3 was the only ISI node that was still on common code. The H1 specific versions of the other nodes will redefine a few of the dofs that get paths turned on and off. I spoke with Jim and we decided to bring HAM3 in line with the rest and made a copy of H1 HAM2. Needed to restart this node to pick up the changes since it's a SEI node.
TJ, Sheila, Matt, Andrew (job shadow today), Camilla. WP12433. Table layout D1400241.
Following on from other beam profile work at the end stations 81358, Madi Simmonds models G2500646 and the ideas we had for understanding ETM mode matching better (googledoc), today we took some beam profiles of the EY ALS beam reflected of ETM HR in the HWS path.
We added a 532nm quarter waveplate downstream of the beamspiltter (ALS-M11) and tuned it to maximize the light reflected into the HWS path. This was removed when we were finished and left with Nanoscan beam profile.
We first took some beam profile measurements (photos 1-4) first with the QPD offsets on nominally, and then with the offsets zero'ed (phots 5-9). Unless the beam has been pico-ed (which it may have) the zero offsets should have the beam more centered on the Transmon parabolic mirrors. The beam changed when the offsets were turned off but did not look better/worse, just different. Compare photo 4 (QPD offsets on) and photo 5 (offsets off).
Photo
#
|
|
A1 horizontal
13.5%
|
A2 vertical
13.5%
|
A1 horizontal
50%
|
A2 vertical
50%
|
Started with QPDs on at thier usual values: | |||||
1
|
50.5cm downstream of HWS-M3 (between M3 and M4)
|
1485
|
1685
|
723
|
871
|
2
|
42.5cm downstream of HWS-M3 (between M3 and M4)
|
1783
|
1985
|
877
|
970
|
3
|
36.5cm downstream of HWS-M3 (between M3 and M4)
|
1872
|
2146
|
924
|
1135
|
4
|
13.0cm downstream of HWS-M3 (between M3 and M4)
|
2540
|
2991
|
1247
|
1516
|
Then we turned off QPD offsets and retook data:
|
|||||
9
|
51cm downstream of HWS-M3 (between M3 and M4)
|
1370
|
1570
|
676
|
853
|
8
|
33.5cm downstream of HWS-M3 (between M3 and M4)
|
1939
|
2184
|
959
|
1086
|
7
|
48.5cm downstream of HWS-M3 (between M3 and M4)
|
1440
|
1655
|
706
|
876
|
6
|
36cm downstream of HWS-M3 (between M3 and M4)
|
1830
|
2130
|
913
|
1098
|
5
|
13.0cm downstream of HWS-M3 (between M3 and M4)
|
2186
|
2861
|
1045
|
1077
|
I double checked the positions of PR3 and SR3 before the DAQ restart that's planned for today, SR3 seems to have done a bit of drifting from the LVEA zone4 temperature increasing by ~ 2 degrees. The T cursers denote the power outage. PR3s YAW oplev looks a little different post power outage but its' top mass osems don't really seem to have moved.
Mon Apr 14 10:08:47 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 8min 44secs
FAMIS 31081 (this also serves as a checkup on the PSL following the large power outage early last week)
Generally things are behaving as expected with just a few exceptions. Most notably, both amplifier output powers are ~1W lower than before the outage, likely due to the current being lower on the pump diodes in AMP1 by ~0.1A each. We had set the currents for AMP1 (power supplies 1 and 2) back to pre-outage levels of 8.7A, but perhaps due to rounding issues coming out of Beckhoff (?) the actual current is apparently lower. We may bump these up by another tenth of an amp to see if this brings the output power back up.
PMC transmitted power is lower by ~1W (and noisier), either due to the lower power out of the amplifiers or the misalignment I can clearly see on the PMC REFL camera. I'll plan to try and touch that up, along with RefCav alignment, before the work in the enclosure for the installation of the SPI pickoff starts tomorrow. Edit: I forgot that the picomotor driver for the PSL is shared with IOT2L and lives on that table which is fully disconnected for vent work.
Morning dry air skid checks, water pump, kobelco, drying towers all nominal.
Dew point measurement at YBM , approx. -44C
Closes FAMIS26372, last checked in alog83723.
Nothing of note on the scopes, everything looks like it did during the last check.
Elenna, Matt, Camilla. Continuing ISC component inspection and prep for re-installation from 83858.
Elenna, Matt and I continued to first contact the optics in pans 1 and 2: M7, M11, M12 (new 90/10 BS), M13, M15 (New 50/50 BS), M16, M17, M18. After again inspecting some of those we cleaned yesterday, we decided to re-clean some. Some needed multiple first contacting, they aren't all perfect (there is a 1" long incredibly hard to see line on M15 and a mark in the center of M18 photo that I will ask a second option on), but otherwise we are calling these two pans of optics ready for re-installation.
For M15, I installed the picomotors that I removed from the right handed mount into a left handed siskiyou mount. I installed the manually adjustable actuators removed from the left handed mount into the right handed mount, this will be stored. Notes on how to do this are attached.
Still to be done: decide if M15 and M18 are okay or need swapping, clean optics in pan 3; inspect periscope mirrors; swap out any glass beamdumps we can.
In this alog, M18 is actually M10, E1000669 S/N 014, HR1064HT532. After speaking with Keita, we plan to replace the optics I couldn't clean, M10 and M15.
I have swapped the pan location of M15 and L2, so that L2 is now M15 is in pan#1 and L2 is in pan#2. This has been updated in the googledoc.
Sheila and I were concerned that the not closed-edge large white cloths could be causing more dust to fall on the optics, but the ones we packed on Friday still looked fine today so we think that is not an issue. We put individual closed-edge white cloths over each optic in pan 2. All the optics in pan 2 (HW1, L2, M7, M17) are clean and ready to install and it's placed back in the HAM3 cleanroom rack.
This afternoon Matt and I first contacted M1, M5, M6, M14, M18 and the new optics for M10 (E1000669-v1 S/N:?) and M15 (E040512-B1 S/N: 826-08). We're leaving a second coat on M1, M10 and M15 overnight, the center of the others all look good.
Today's activities:
The new RF 5-way coax cable in the feedthrus are a little tight in the 5-way cross, but seemed to work ok. Also, the connections on the 4.5" feedthru port are a deep pocket connection so I was not convinced that the new connector was fully seated since you could not visually see it. Marc came out and checked continuity to settle my fears given the newness of this joint and the fact that we have many more to do. All good so far.
Picture of the completed D6 port on HAM 1, with new feedthrus and assembled five way cross extension.
Because of the tightness of the connectors when pushing the 4.5" feedthru into the D6b cross (namely the D6-5wx2 port), Fil and I checked for grounding on all of the ports/connections on this cross. All passed. Travis noted some tightness on the 5-way cross port 5wx4 on D1 opposite the chamber as well. So, Fil and I started checking these and indeed found a ground loop "fail" on both 25pins of the D1-5wx4 cross. We will try to swap in new style 25pin cables D2000456 which have entirely PEEK connector to see if that mitigates this. More to come in separate log.
[Betsy, Keita, Camilla, Richard M., Elenna]
After the power outage, we wanted to get some confirmation of PZT pointing out of the PSL. Betsy, Keita and Camilla went in the cleanroom with the IR viewer and indicator cards and took the covers off the IMC refl and trans viewports on HAM2. Keita found the beam out of the IMC REFL viewport, and I adjusted the IMC PZT in pitch and yaw under direction from Keita. I accidentally moved the pitch slider a bit at the beginning due to user error. Then, we took large steps of 1000 or 2000 counts to move the offsets in pitch and yaw.
Start values: pitch: 22721, yaw: 5488
End values: pitch: 21192, yaw: 6488
Then, Betsy found the beam out of the IMC TRANS viewport and Richard marked the beam spot approximately on the outside of the cleanroom curtain with a red sharpie. This is super rough but gives us a general location of the beam. We think this is a good enough pointing recovery to proceed with vent activities.
During this work, PSL waveplate rotetor was set to 200mW and then de-energized. I haven't re-energized as we don't need higher power for a long time.
PSL laser pipe was temporarily opened for this task and was closed after.
Attached video shows the flashing of the beam in MC TRANS path. The alignment from the PSL through the IMC is not crazy. Any further refinement should be done after we start pumping down the corner before we install HAM1 optics.
Accepting PZT offsets in h1ascimc SAFE.snap table.