Displaying reports 61-80 of 86315.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End
Reports until 14:44, Friday 16 January 2026
H1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:44, Friday 16 January 2026 (88790)
BSC2 HEPI locked

Locked BSC2 HEPI this afternoon so Randy and I could try to get the PEM accel plates of the south end of the support tubes. Plan was to try to crane the south end of the work platform, but the platform didn't like being picked up from just one end and it looked like it was going to swing into the crossbeam. We set the platform back down and just pulled all of the screws out of the PEM plates. Turned out there was just enough room to get the blocked screws out, if you used pliers or fingers to back them out. Plates are off, platform is moved back into position, I think Randy was going to put the braces back on.

H1 AOS
karmeng.kwan@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:16, Friday 16 January 2026 - last comment - 21:59, Monday 19 January 2026(88789)
HAM7 ZM4 alignment

[Sheila, Rahul, Karmeng]

A continuation of yesterday's progress. The additional power observed yesterday was due to the green for FC lock. We measured 0.75mW exiting the OPO, 0.74mW after SFI1 and also on the SQZT7 homodyne detector.

Today we reduced the saturation on ZM4 by clearing the offset and physically rotate the ZM4, we recovered the alignment on OMC QPDs and SQZT7 irises.

We also aligned the beam back to the HAM7 QPD A and B, at ~100nW for both of them, will need to re-centre the beam once we're back to laser hazard.

 

Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 21:59, Monday 19 January 2026 (88796)

Friday, we recentered the beam onto the OPO pump fiber rejected PD.  

Robert and I also went to the chamber in laser safe in the afternoon and reattached the cable clamp to the pillar on the hard to reach side of the VIP, and took phots of the camble routhing and iris locations. 

Since we adjusted the alignment of B:M4 while moving the beam location in SFI2, we had to realing the path to the FC QPDs as Kar Meng mentioned above.  We did this using the seed beam because that beam can be seen on a card, but it saturated the QPDs.  We walked the pointing until the beam was on both QPDs as seen by saturating all the quadrants, we will want to use the CLF beam to actually center on these QPDs so that we aren't saturating. 

Still to do in HAM7 in laser hazard:

  • The green filter cavity beam seems to be misalinged relative to the IR, we noticed this in December.  Now that we feel confident about the IR alignment we need to come back to the green alignment. 
  • Decide what to do about the OFI PD A path, which will no longer be aligned because of our move of the spot in SFI2.  (Probably blocking it)
  • unlock VIP
  • photograph beams on irises
  • revisit the power budget one more time, writting down the measured power levels both in the OPO trans path and the reflection path

Not in laser hazard:  

  • remove irises
  • unlock ISI
  • SUS and ISI health checks
H1 SUS (SUS)
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:59, Friday 16 January 2026 - last comment - 09:49, Wednesday 21 January 2026(88788)
HAM7 - ZM4 physically moved in Yaw

Sheila, Karmeng, Rahul

This morning we physically moved ZM4 (since the sliders were saturating the DAQ output) in YAW to better align it with ZM5 and ZM6. More details (including health check results) will be posted later.

ZM4 is now dogged down to its new position. 

Comments related to this report
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 09:49, Wednesday 21 January 2026 (88827)SUS

I ran a quick transfer functions on ZM4, a few things to note. The suspension is in air so I changed the Coil Driver state from 2 to 1 (reverted once I was done) as the wiki suggested, the ISI is also tripped but the damping was engaged on the suspension. We were also slightly shaking due to an 6.1 earthquake from near Japan.

The suspension is looking healthy.

/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HXDS/H1/ZM4/SAGM1/Data/

2026-01-21_1700_H1SUSZM4_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p01to50Hz.xml
2026-01-21_1700_H1SUSZM4_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p01to50Hz.xml
2026-01-21_1700_H1SUSZM4_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p01to50Hz.xml

Images attached to this comment
H1 SUS (SUS)
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:53, Friday 16 January 2026 - last comment - 15:17, Tuesday 20 January 2026(88786)
HRTS OM0 Optic-Prisms glued and then shipped to LLO

Betsy, RyanC, Rahul

This week we glued prisms (primary - sapphire and secondary - metal) to the HRTS OM0 fused silica Optic (D2100495-V5-OM0-0001). The gluing measurement details are recorded in the DCC - google spreadsheet (T2600012), link given below,

https://caltech-my.sharepoint.com/:x:/g/personal/rmcrouch_caltech_edu/IQBWQ2S3pJX9TZYxfDaXsCvfAcJh-mrpHPS2JGNtku6Srcg

Attachment01 and attachment02 shows the prism-optic in the prism gluing jig.

Attachment03 and attachment04 shows the base for the Bosem magnet/flag glued to the AR side of the optic.

Attachment05 and attachment06 shows the two prisms glued on both the sides of the barrel of the optic. Notice that the arrow points to the HR surface and there is only one scribe line on the optic. While in the jig the arrow should be pointing down and on the right hand side of the gluing fixture (facing down).

The optic is now on its way to LLO and will be suspended in OM0 in HAM6 chamber.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 15:17, Tuesday 20 January 2026 (88810)EPO

Tagging for EPO.

H1 General
matthewrichard.todd@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:12, Friday 16 January 2026 (88785)
ISS Noise Budget for O4c

M. Todd, C. Cahillane, K. Kawabe


In the last quarter of 2025, I was running a bunch of injections to the various ASC DOFs of the IMC, and looking at the response in the ISS --- this was all in an effort to explain the various features in the witnessed RIN from the out of loop diodes of the ISS array, or in other words create a noise budget for the ISS. In short, I believe we are IMC ASC limited below 5Hz while acheiving the shot noise limit from 20-1000Hz.

There are some peaks in the witnessed RIN that are not in the in-loop ASD, suggesting it is some noise being imposed by the loop itself. Further measurements will try and explore the source of some of these, particularly the ones around 18 and 24 Hz, with a suspicion of the IMs motion.


I wanted this alog to serve as a reference for where all the data lives for these measurements, as well as the code and noise budget plot. Note, the ISS_OUTER and INNER rin channels are saved with quick_psd, but the gpstimes are recorded in the table below.

For the projections, a transfer function is measured during the excitation of the measured DOF --- looking at the TF from the best witness channel to the ISS OUTER, and then that transfer function is applied to the witness during the quiet time when there is no excitation.

Measurement GPS Time File Location Notes
ISS OUTER RIN
1446823543 
/ligo/home/matthewrichard.todd/Projects/imc_injections/dtt_injections/quiet_data_iss_outer_rin.txt Taken with quick_psd and then saved
ISS INNER RIN 1446823543 /ligo/home/matthewrichard.todd/Projects/imc_injections/dtt_injections/quiet_data_iss_inner_rin.txt Taken with quick_psd and then saved
IMC PZT Pitch projection 1446912665 /ligo/home/matthewrichard.todd/Projects/imc_injections/dtt_injections/pzt_pit_injection_1_15_Hz.xml

Injection Band: 1-15Hz

Best Witness: WFS_A_PIT

IMC PZT Pitch projection 1445107725 /ligo/home/matthewrichard.todd/Projects/imc_injections/dtt_injections/pzt_pit_injection_15_1000_Hz.xml

Injection Band: 15-1000Hz

Best Witness: WFS_A_PIT

IMC PZT Yaw projection 1446900349 /ligo/home/matthewrichard.todd/Projects/imc_injections/dtt_injections/pzt_yaw_injection_1_15_Hz.xml

Injection Band: 1-15Hz

Best Witness: WFS_A_YAW

IMC PZT Yaw projection 1445108720 /ligo/home/matthewrichard.todd/Projects/imc_injections/dtt_injections/pzt_yaw_injection_15_1000_Hz.xml

Injection Band: 15-1000Hz

Best Witness: WFS_A_YAW

IMC DOF 1 Pitch projection

1445698453 /ligo/home/matthewrichard.todd/Projects/imc_injections/dtt_injections/imc_dof_1_pit_injection_1_4_Hz.xml

Injection Band: 1-4Hz

Coherent Band: 0.2-5Hz

Best Witness: WFS_B_PIT

IMC DOF 1 Yaw projection

1445698453 /ligo/home/matthewrichard.todd/Projects/imc_injections/dtt_injections/imc_dof_1_yaw_injection_1_4_Hz.xml

Injection Band: 1-4Hz

Coherent Band: 0.2-5Hz

Best Witness: WFS_B_YAW

IMC DOF 2 Pitch projection

1445698453 /ligo/home/matthewrichard.todd/Projects/imc_injections/dtt_injections/imc_dof_2_pit_injection_1_4_Hz.xml

Injection Band: 1-4Hz

Coherent Band: 0.2-4Hz

Best Witness: MC2_TRANS_PIT

IMC DOF 2 Yaw projection

1446303221 /ligo/home/matthewrichard.todd/Projects/imc_injections/dtt_injections/imc_dof_2_yaw_injection_1_4_Hz.xml

Injection Band: 1-4Hz

Coherent Band: 0.2-5Hz

Best Witness: WFS_A_YAW

       

ISS Noise Budget O4c

Non-image files attached to this report
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:17, Friday 16 January 2026 (88784)
Fri CP1 Fill

Fri Jan 16 10:12:08 2026 INFO: Fill completed in 12min 4secs

 

Images attached to this report
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:14, Friday 16 January 2026 (88783)
Model changes Friday 16th January 2026

Jeff, Oli, Jonathan, EJ, Dave:

h1susaux[b13, b2h34] new models were installed, b13 for cosmetic simulink changes, h2b34 restored missing channels and needed a DAQ restart.

We did two rounds of DAQ restarts.

09:04 both legs restarted for susauxb2h34 changes. No problems.

09:56 GDS1 restart to add the three BS_M1_NOISEMON channels back into GDS. Followed by full 0-leg restart to do the same with GDS0. No problems.

H1 SUS (OpsInfo)
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:28, Friday 16 January 2026 (88782)
SATMON thresholds updated, plus automated update script

Catching up on the DAC upgrades / CDS work earlier this week I updated some thresholds on the SUS SATMON screen. There were quite a few suspensions and stages to do this time so I decided to generate some code to string match and update the values for me so I don't have to spend the time copy pasting.

The script is called "satmon_update_sats_dac_upgrade.py" and its located in the same directory as SATMON. If you open it in an editor and scroll to the bottom you'll see how to use it. Here's an example line for updating PR2_M3 from a 18 to a 20 bit DAC card.

update_adl_for_channel('SATMON.adl', 'SATMON.adl', 'PR2', old_dac_bits=18, new_dac_bits=20, stage='M3')
 
ITMX all stages upgraded from 20 to 28 bit
BS all stages upgraded from 20 to 28 bit
MC2 all stages upgraded from 18 to 28 bit
PR2 M1 upgraded from 18 to 28 bit
PR2 M2/M3 upgraded from 18 to 20
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:54, Friday 16 January 2026 (88781)
Frontend Model Work Thursday 15th January 2026

Jeff, Oli, Jonathan, EJ, Erik, Dave:

On Thursday 15Jan2026 we installed Jeff and Oli's new models for:

h1susmc2, h1suspr2, h1sussr2, h1susbs

h1susitmx, h1susitmy, h1susitmpi

h1susauxb13, h1susauxb2h34

Several DAQ restarts were needed for these installs. The first DAQ restart also had an EDC restart to use updated SDF and CDSMON ini files incorporating the new model names.

The models in h1susb2h34 had two sets of restarts. After the first EJ found some IPC issues which he fixed by editing H1.ipc. All the models were then restarts a second time.

In the first block of restarts h1suspr2 had two starts, the second to fix a 18bit-DAC to 20bit-DAC change.

We had three instances of new models removing channels from the DAQ which were being sent to GDS via the broadcaster. Jonathan removed these from the broadcaster list we are working today on whether they should be added back, perhaps with a different name.

Here are the models and GDS channel lists:

h1susitmx (4):

H1:FEC-29_DAC_OVERFLOW_ACC_2_[4-7]

h1susitmy (4):

H1:FEC-30_DAC_OVERFLOW_ACC_2_[4-7]

h1susauxb2h34 (3):

H1:SUS-BS_M1_NOISEMON_F[1-3]_OUT_DQ

As Jonathan details in his alog, after the restart of h1susauxb2h34 the DAQ was running with duplicate BS-AUX channels which had been added to h1susauxb2h34 and were still running on h1susauxb13 (a temporary model I built on Wed). This was resolved when the new h1susauxb13 was installed.

Restart Log

Thu15Jan2026
LOC TIME HOSTNAME     MODEL/REBOOT
12:32:41 h1susb2h34   h1susmc2    <<< First set of h1susb2h34 restarts
12:33:07 h1susb2h34   h1suspr2    
12:36:07 h1susb2h34   h1sussr2    
12:36:25 h1susb2h34   h1susbs     
12:45:57 h1susb2h34   h1suspr2    <<< Fix 18bit-DAC issue


13:07:10 h1susb2h34   h1susmc2    <<< Second set of h1susb2h34 restarts with fixed IPC
13:07:29 h1susb2h34   h1suspr2    
13:07:54 h1susb2h34   h1sussr2    
13:08:12 h1susb2h34   h1susbs     


13:32:14 h1daqdc1     [DAQ]  <<< DAQ 1-leg, new models and new EDC
13:32:25 h1daqfw1     [DAQ]
13:32:26 h1daqtw1     [DAQ]
13:32:29 h1daqnds1    [DAQ]
13:32:35 h1daqgds1    [DAQ]
13:32:51 h1susauxh56 h1edc[DAQ]  <<< EDC restart
13:34:56 h1daqgds1    [DAQ] <<< GDS1 needed second restart
13:36:31 h1daqgds0    [DAQ] <<< DAQ 0-leg
13:36:39 h1daqfw0     [DAQ]
13:36:39 h1daqtw0     [DAQ]
13:36:40 h1daqnds0    [DAQ]


14:50:28 h1susb13     h1susitmx   <<< New h1susb13 models
14:50:52 h1susb13     h1susitmy   
14:51:13 h1susb13     h1susitmpi  


14:57:31 h1daqdc1     [DAQ] <<< DAQ 1-leg restart for new models
14:57:41 h1daqfw1     [DAQ]
14:57:41 h1daqtw1     [DAQ]
14:57:43 h1daqnds1    [DAQ]
15:04:22 h1daqfw1     [DAQ]  <<< FW1 spontaneous restart
15:07:00 h1daqgds1    [DAQ] <<< GDS1 manual start after missing channels removed
15:09:02 h1daqfw1     [DAQ] <<< 2nd FW1 spontaneous restart
15:17:02 h1daqgds0    [DAQ] <<< 0-leg restart
15:17:09 h1daqfw0     [DAQ]
15:17:09 h1daqtw0     [DAQ]
15:17:10 h1daqnds0    [DAQ]


15:50:54 h1susauxb2h34 h1susauxb2h34 <<< new model (unknowingly adding duplicate chans)


15:54:02 h1daqdc1     [DAQ] <<< DAQ restart for model change, 1-leg
15:54:11 h1daqfw1     [DAQ]
15:54:11 h1daqtw1     [DAQ]
15:54:15 h1daqnds1    [DAQ]
15:54:20 h1daqgds1    [DAQ]
16:02:39 h1daqgds0    [DAQ] <<< 0-leg
16:02:45 h1daqfw0     [DAQ]
16:02:46 h1daqnds0    [DAQ]
16:02:46 h1daqtw0     [DAQ] <<< At this point FW2 is unstable due to duplicate channels, not sure why 0-leg & 1-leg are running at this point


17:23:09 h1susauxb13  h1susauxb13 <<< new model (removed duplicate BS chans)


17:23:53 h1daqdc1     [DAQ] <<< 1-leg
17:24:03 h1daqfw1     [DAQ]
17:24:03 h1daqtw1     [DAQ]
17:24:07 h1daqnds1    [DAQ]
17:31:19 h1daqgds1    [DAQ] <<< GDS1 manual restart after removing GDS chans from broadcaster
17:33:22 h1daqgds0    [DAQ] <<< 0-leg restart
17:33:27 h1daqfw0     [DAQ]
17:33:28 h1daqnds0    [DAQ]
17:33:28 h1daqtw0     [DAQ]
17:37:55 h1daqfw0     [DAQ] <<< FW0 spontaneous restart
 

H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:38, Friday 16 January 2026 (88780)
Ops Day Shift Start

TITLE: 01/16 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: MAINTENANCE
    Wind: 8mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.22 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

More alignment going on today, and going to laser safe in the afternoon

H1 ISC (INS, ISC)
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:04, Thursday 15 January 2026 - last comment - 15:17, Tuesday 20 January 2026(88779)
JAC beam into HAM2 but not out yet (Jennie, Masayuki, Jason, Keita)

Since nobody seems to have made an alog, here it is.

We've steered the JAC transmission beam into HAM2 and removed the viewport cover on HAM2 on the +Y side to look inside. At first we had a hard time seeing anything. We steered the beam in YAW and PIT and still nothing.

After a while we found that if we position the IR viewer at a specific position and look into the baffle hole of the MC refl periscope (circled in yellow in the 1st attachment), we can see some kind of ugly IR that definitely comes from JAC, but no beam seemed to be coming out of the baffle hole.

2nd attachment shows the picture shot by an IR sensitive camra when we focused on the IR, and the 3rd attachment shows the same picture shot from the same position but focused on the  baffle.

The distance from the sensor to the subject according to the lens' indicator was something like 4m for IR and 1.5-2m for the baffle. The indicator is only good for visible light and not for IR, but empirically the scale is not a factor of 2 off for IR, so we're looking at something that is far from the baffle (i.e. we're looking at the image of the source reflected by the periscope mirrors).

Another possibility that Masayuki points out is that it could be some IR beam (probably not the main beam) hitting the vertical metal pillar of the periscope behind the bottom periscope mirror and we're looking at that through the space between the baffle hole and the periscope mirror (see the 4th attachment). I think that unlikely because the pillar is merely inches away from the baffle and the distance indicator of the lens doesn't agree. But we'll see.

Tomorrow we intend to remove the septum window cover for IFO REFL and POP and look into HAM2 from there, that way hopefully it's easier to find where the JAC beam lands in HAM2.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 15:17, Tuesday 20 January 2026 (88809)EPO

Tagging for EPO

jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 12:59, Tuesday 20 January 2026 (88803)EPO

Photos of trying to find the beam out of HAM2. I think the photographer was Jason and in the foreground is Keita, with Masayuki in the background.

Images attached to this comment
H1 DAQ
jonathan.hanks@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:04, Thursday 15 January 2026 - last comment - 15:13, Friday 16 January 2026(88778)
End of day daqd restarts and issues

We had some hiccups in our end of day daqd restart.

1. There were duplicate channels between the h1susb13 and h1susb2h34 models.  We are not sure how these got through, the daqd should have crashed on startup with an error message.  We found this as it caused issues on the test framewriter on h1daqfw2.

2. After Oli removed the old block from h1susb13 we found that there were some GDS broadcaster channels that were dropped that probably shouldn't be.  We removed them from the broadcast list in order to get the daqd to run.  Listing the channels here so that they can be added back in tommorow:

Comments related to this report
jonathan.hanks@LIGO.ORG - 15:13, Friday 16 January 2026 (88791)

After looking through the code, this is an old bug.  It has been fixed for a while.  The daqd had not been updated with the rcg for a long time due to no feature changes.

We should do a daqd package upgrade next week.

H1 SQZ
karmeng.kwan@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:42, Thursday 15 January 2026 (88777)
HAM7 alignment progress

[Sheila, Karmeng]

Today we checked and managed to reduce some of the saturation on ZM4, and offload it onto ZM6. The changes were undone for now.

We briefly did the power budget check, but the power measured at the output of the SFI1 is fluctuating (between 0.79mW to 1.6mW) when the input to SFI1 is at 0.79mW. The power is stable down the propagation (after AP1 and SFI2), unsure what causes the fluctuation. Will continue to look into this tomorrow.

We also did an OMC scan, the pink trace is the scan when ZM4 is in its original setting (YAW: 1779.5), and the red trace is correspond to ZM4 misalignment (YAW: 1769.5).

Images attached to this report
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:32, Thursday 15 January 2026 (88769)
Thurs DAY Ops Summary

TITLE: 01/15 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY:

Update to "Status of Things":  HAM1-2 Septum had a viewport cover removed (so, 3 of 4 are covered) for JAC alignment.  ~100mW coming from the PSL to HAM1 for JAC (not noted on the white board).

JAC alignment work continued most of the day.  Did not roll IOT2 into place (latest plans are to do this tomorrow [Fri] afternoon) with the LVEA being transitioned to SAFE prior to this work (aiming for lunchtime).  

SQZ alignment work continued in the afternoon.

SUS model/daq work appears to be nearing completion (Jeff, Oli, RyanS, Dave (remote), EJ (remote)) !
LOG:

H1 PSL
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:28, Thursday 15 January 2026 (88776)
PSL 10-Day Trends

FAMIS 31120

Starting last Thursday, the NPRO temperature is a bit more unstable than usual, but I'm not exactly sure why. There was a brief incursion into the anteroom last Friday, which is seen in the usual places, but everything appears to have come back as expected. The RefCav still looks to need some alignment, which I will likely get to next week. Otherwise, the PSL is looking good.

Images attached to this report
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:09, Thursday 15 January 2026 (88774)
ThuCP1 Fill

Thu Jan 15 10:08:48 2026 INFO: Fill completed in 8min 45secs

 

Images attached to this report
H1 PSL
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:39, Thursday 15 January 2026 (88773)
PSL Status Report Weekly FAMIS

Closes FAMIS#39747, last checked 88725


Laser Status:
    NPRO output power is 1.845W
    AMP1 output power is 70.39W
    AMP2 output power is 139.1W
    NPRO watchdog is GREEN
    AMP1 watchdog is GREEN
    AMP2 watchdog is GREEN
    PDWD watchdog is GREEN

PMC:
    It has been locked 6 days, 18 hr 2 minutes
    Reflected power = 26.47W
    Transmitted power = 104.5W
    PowerSum = 131.0W

FSS:
    It has been locked for 2 days 23 hr and 18 min
    TPD[V] = 0.4029V

ISS:
    The diffracted power is around 4.0%
    Last saturation event was 0 days 0 hours and 0 minutes ago


Possible Issues:
    PMC reflected power is high

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:12, Thursday 15 January 2026 - last comment - 09:12, Thursday 15 January 2026(88768)
Thurs DAY Ops Transition

TITLE: 01/15 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: MAINTENANCE
    Wind: 9mph Gusts, 5mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.25 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

JAC work continues with IOT2L being rolled up to HAM2 this morning for [IOT2 will be later today or Fri] alignment checks & IMC locking.  Equipment moves in LVEA and from EY, and I believe there is more Squeezer alignment as well at HAM7.

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 07:45, Thursday 15 January 2026 (88770)

Once again, Dust Monitor LAB2 has a "not a number" ERROR, all others OK/correct.

H1 PEM
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:57, Thursday 15 January 2026 (88771)
HVAC Fan Vibrometers FAMIS Check (FAMIS 39850)

For FAMIS #39850: All fan trends look nice and flat.

Images attached to this report
Displaying reports 61-80 of 86315.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End